Developing

UPDATE 1-Paper published by China's Huawei decries U.S. treatment

* Paper published on eve of House Intelligence Committee

hearing

* Huawei-commissioned paper cites McCarthy-era Red Scare

witch-hunting

* ZTE Corp also is focus of intelligence committee

investigation

(Adds details, comment from spokesman, paragraph 9)

WASHINGTON, Sept 12 (Reuters) - A paper published by China's

biggest telecommunications equipment maker said the company's

path into the United States had been blocked by unsubstantiated

"allegations based on allegations" that threatened to harm ties

between the world's two biggest economies.

The complaint published by Huawei Technologies Co - topped

by a reference to McCarthy-era Red Scare witch-hunting - was

spelled out on the eve of the company's scheduled testimony

Thursday at a rare public hearing of the U.S. House of

Representatives' Intelligence Committee.

The committee is completing a nearly year-long investigation

of security threats allegedly posed by equipment sold by

Shenzhen, China-based Huawei, as well as ZTE Corp, a

smaller cross-town rival also frustrated by challenges entering

the U.S. market.

The concern is that their products may be booby-trapped and

provide the Chinese "an opportunity for greater foreign

espionage, threaten our critical infrastructure, or increase the

opportunities for Chinese economic espionage," the

Republican-led House Intelligence panel said in a notice about

the hearing.

Huawei, second only in telecom gear sales worldwide to

Sweden's Ericsson, pushed back with an 81-page paper titled "The

Case for Huawei in America," published on the web site of its

U.S. subsidiary Wednesday night.

"Much of the evidence fueling lawmakers' concerns remains

classified," said the heavily footnoted paper by Dan Steinbock,

described as an authority on trade and investment and

U.S.-Chinese relations.

"However, when one set of allegations are substantiated with

another set of allegations, the line between investigation and

maltreatment grows thin," the Huawei-commissioned paper said,

decrying "allegations based on allegations."

Continued rebuffs of Huawei in the United States, the

document added, "is giving rise to a de facto blueprint for

mirror-like Chinese measures to protect perceived strategic

industries in the mainland."

William Plummer, a spokesman in the United States for

Huawei, said the words in the paper belonged to Steinbock, not

the company.

FIRST TESTIMONY

A spokesman for the Chinese embassy had no immediate comment

on the congressional hearing. Testifying for Huawei will be

Charles Ding, a corporate senior vice president; for ZTE, Zhu

Jinyun, senior vice president for North America and Europe.

The two are believed to be the first representatives of

major Chinese corporations to testify before a U.S.

congressional committee.

Huawei and Bain Capital Partners were forced to give up

their bid in 2008 for computer-equipment maker 3Com Corp after

the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States - an

interagency group led by the Treasury Department - raised

objections. Last year, Huawei dropped plans to buy certain

assets from 3Leaf Systems, a computer services company, after

more problems with the foreign investment panel.

An unsuccessful outcome for Huawei in the United States

would have "adverse implications" for U.S.-Chinese relations

far beyond Huawei, the paper paid for by Huawei said.

The paper's cover sheet quoted the U.S. journalist Edward R.

Murrow on Senator Joseph McCarthy, whose "Red Scare" hearings in

the early 1950s become synonymous with reckless, witch-hunt

hysteria.

"No one familiar with the history of this country can deny

that congressional committees are useful," said the Murrow quote

reproduced in the paper. "It is necessary to investigate before

legislating, but the line between investigating and persecuting

is a very fine one."

A White House spokeswoman said President Barack Obama's

administration was looking broadly at the opportunities, risks

and implications of reliance on global, commercial markets, not

aiming at "any particular company."

"We understand the potential for risks to our country

introduced via the supply chain for telecommunications equipment

and services," said spokeswoman Caitlin Hayden.

Across the government, efforts are under way to

institutionalize understanding of the telecommunications

environment for a "nuanced response to risk that addresses

national security concerns as well as the competitiveness of

industry and the U.S. economy," she said by email.

(Reporting by Jim Wolf; Editing by Michael Perry)

Your Voice

  • Help! I’ve been hacked: My Twitter nightmare

    Help! I’ve been hacked: My Twitter nightmare

    In the 21st century, social networking has becoming more important to the daily lives of Briton's than breakfast in the morning - and with over 10million active More »

    Yahoo! Contributor Network - Fri, May 10, 2013
  • UFOs in the Welsh Valleys

    UFOs in the Welsh Valleys

    When my husband was in his teens, he was out walking along the beach one night when he saw a red light speeding along just above ground level. Suddenly it shot up More »

    Yahoo! Contributor Network - Thu, May 9, 2013
  • Samsung Galaxy S4: My verdict

    Samsung Galaxy S4: My verdict

    The Samsung Galaxy S4 has been flying out of British shops for a few days now. The major competitor to Apple's iPhone, the Galaxy has been hotly anticipated. As a More »

    Yahoo! Contributor Network - Wed, May 8, 2013