Developing

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    UPDATE 1-US will not prosecute Goldman Sachs, employees for Abacus deal

    WASHINGTON, Aug 9 (Reuters) - Neither Goldman Sachs Group

    Inc nor its employees will face U.S. criminal charges

    related to trades they made during the financial crisis that

    were highlighted in a 2011 U.S. Senate report, the Justice

    Department said on Thursday.

    The unusual announcement not to prosecute criminally came in

    an unsigned statement attributed to the department.

    Few expected the bank to face criminal charges, but in April

    2011, U.S. Senator Carl Levin asked for a criminal investigation

    after the subcommittee he leads spent years looking into

    Goldman.

    Levin's subcommittee held televised hearings as part of its

    inquiry, which centered on a subprime mortgage product known as

    Abacus. He said Goldman misled Congress and investors.

    Goldman employee Fabrice Tourre still faces a civil

    complaint from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. He

    has denied any wrongdoing and was the only person accused.

    Goldman itself settled with the SEC for $550 million in July

    2010 without admitting wrongdoing.

    The statement from the Justice Department said that

    officials there "have determined that, based on the law and

    evidence as they exist at this time, there is not a viable basis

    to bring a criminal prosecution with respect to Goldman Sachs or

    its employees in regard to the allegations set forth in the

    report" from Levin's subcommittee.

    Justice Department investigators and prosecutors worked on

    their inquiry for "more than a year," the statement said.

    Those working on the inquiry included officials in the

    department's Criminal Division and in the U.S. Attorney's Office

    in Manhattan, the statement said.

    They "ultimately concluded that the burden of proof to bring

    a criminal case could not be met based on the law and facts as

    they exist at this time," the statement continued.

    "If any additional or new evidence emerges, today's

    assessment does not prevent the department from reviewing such

    evidence and making a different determination, if warranted,"

    the statement said.