It's not every day that Hollywood descends on Tbilisi. Sure, Renny Harlin is not the star action director he was in the early 90s when he was making films like "Die Hard 2" and "Cliffhanger." And Andy Garcia is no longer at the top of Hollywood's A-list. But by the way Georgia reacted to their arrival, you'd think Steven Spielberg and Brad Pitt had come to town.
Garcia's visit -- he's playing President Mikheil Saakashvili in an as-yet untitled movie Harlin is directing about last year's Georgia-Russia war -- dominated newscasts and filled newspapers here for most of the week. Tbilisi's top hotel buzzed with gossip as tanned Hollywood-types in expensive suits roamed the halls.
Georgia's government pulled out all the stops to accommodate the production, allowing Garcia to be filmed in the presidential residence and shutting down central Tbilisi to recreate a mass rally during the war. Some reports say the government even loaned tanks and soldiers for the production's action scenes.
From early footage, Garcia seems to do a credible job of portraying the flamboyant Saakashvili. There is enough of a resemblance and Garcia manages to capture Saakashvili's quirky mannerisms. Cuban-born Garcia struggles with the accent though, making Saakashvili sound a little too much like Al Pacino's Scarface. See YouTube footage here
Harlin insists the film, which follows an American journalist covering the conflict, will be more than an action movie and will have a strong 'anti-war' message.
With a pro-Saakashvili lawmaker as one of the movie's producers, he may find it tough to shake the idea that the film will push only Georgia's version of events.
Moscow and Tbilisi have waged a huge international public-relations battle over the war, blaming each other for sparking the conflict.
Russian television has already shown its own action film based on the war, "Olympus Inferno" which featured an American entomologist and Russian journalist caught up in the conflict. See subtitled YouTube trailer here
With its foreign cast and Hollywood production values, Harlin's version is bound to get more attention when it's released next spring. It's unclear how widely the film will be distributed, but in Tbilisi's cinemas at least, it's sure to be a hit.
In this blog, journalists of global news wire AFP blog about the news they report and the challenges they face covering events from Baghdad to Beijing, the White House to Darfur. Michael Mainville is AFP's correspondent in the Caucasus, covering Armenia Azerbaijan and Georgia.
Editor's Corner
Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! All rights reserved.
Notice: We collect personal information on this site. To learn more about how we use your information, see our: Updated Privacy Policy
Glad this film is being made. It is a fascinating part of the world that I would like to know more about.
Report abuse
boo 2nd comment
Report abuse
hi
Report abuse
Lets see what version of Hollywood history we get this time.
Report abuse
... and will the producers show in their film credits an acknowledgement of their gratitude to the Russian FSB for their help and cooperation in the making of this movie ...?
Report abuse
"i wonder who's side this one will take" :P
Report abuse
Georgia is 100% the bad guy here. Trust me, I know more about this issue than a lot of westerners. I am not going into my own personal details, but rest assured Georgia are to blame for this conflict. Russia simply defended itself against an invasion into it's own territory. South Ossetia is one of Russia's regions. This was invaded by Georgia. Of course Russia will respond and protect the Ossetian people. Georgia is always the aggressor.
Report abuse
Forgot to mention, I would love to see the film, from Georgia's viewpoint, whcih of course will make the Russians look like the aggressors and to blame for the conflict.
Report abuse
This is obviously going to present the Georgian govt's position, so it would be interesting to find out who's funding this, and whether 'western interests' are not behind it. We could do without another Hollywood version of 'history', bearing in mind as well that the western media, including the BBC, showed incredible anti-Russian bias over this war.
Report abuse
I am a huge film buff (who isn't), but as interesting as this film sounds, it seems to be showing one view point. But then it is the people in that situation making a film of their viewpoint. "With a pro-Saakashvili lawmaker as one of the movie's producers, he may find it tough to shake the idea that the film will push only Georgia's version of events." Either the film makers will successfully whitewash the faults of the Georgian government, or it will only highlight them more through any obvious bias of the film.
:
It would be nice to have an accompanying film made highlighting the Russian point of view being given the same profile. Together they can then be a sort of 'compare and contrast' of viewpoints of the events so people can judge for themselves a little better. There are two sides to a story, and unfortunately more often it's the 'truth' in the middle of it that is lost.
Report abuse