This week there have been two high-profile prison sentences made by British courts which have highlighted big flaws in our judicial system.
The first decision came on Tuesday 14th April when Jack Tweed (right) was sentenced to a 12-week jail sentence for an assault on a taxi driver. The chairwoman for Harlow Magistrates' Court said that Tweed's sentence was reduced from 18 weeks because of a "recent change in his personal circumstances" - Jade Goody's death. Of this 12-week sentence Jack will only have to spend six weeks in prison.
The conviction was the second time in six months that Tweed had been found guilty of assault. In September, he was given an 18-month jail sentence after being found guilty of hitting a 16-year-old boy with a golf club. He was released from prison in January, having to wear a monitoring tag and observe a curfew. It was during this time that the attack on the taxi driver took place.
Speaking after the hearing Tweed's solicitor, George Kampanella, said: "The family are devastated and feel that Jack has been treated more severely because of who he is. We are considering the prospects of an appeal."
Compare this to a more recent decision where Aaron Billington (left) was on Thursday 16th April sentenced to a 20-week jail term for vandalising Jamiroquai frontman Jay Kay's Ferrari.
Billington inflicted nearly £10,000 of damage to the vehicle after seeing a girl he had an "emotional attachment to" go to the star's hotel room. He was also allegedly mocked by Jay Kay because of his stutter. Billington, who admitted criminal damage as well as failing to answer bail and leaving bed and breakfast accommodation and an Indian restaurant without paying, was jailed for a total of 20 weeks.
First of all there should be questions raised about whether a court should take into account the death of a loved one when handing down a sentence. Should the law be immune from sympathy?
Secondly, even without the six-week reduction in Jack Tweed's sentence because of Jade's death, he would have served a smaller sentence for assaulting a man than Aaron Billington will for damaging a car.
It's no secret that our laws are centred on possessions more than people but these examples just highlight how wrong they can be. Why is the legal system still deeming crime against people a lower priority than crimes against material objects?
Related content:
Jack Tweed jailed for taxi driver assault
Attack on Jamiroquai's Ferrari: Chef jailed
Editor's Corner
Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! All rights reserved.
Notice: We collect personal information on this site. To learn more about how we use your information, see our: Updated Privacy Policy
This doesn't seem like much of a debate, it's clear the people of Britain are sick of the inconsistent justice system, myself included. Losng someone does not give anyone the right to behave anti socially. We all lose people and we get on with it, complete with money worries and children who have to continue to go to the local comprehensive. Taxi drivers are not on this earth to be abused by low life s@#$% who see fit to abuse people. If these people are dragged up without an ounce of respect then perhaps prison is a good place for them to learn some, but first make room by releasing people who should not be there!!! Who he was married to makes no difference, all I can say is they were well suited. As for JKs car, yeah, it was probably an inconvenience getting it repaired, but the two cases are worlds apart in real terms.
Report abuse
Kill baby P - probable sentence 14 years
Rob a train - sentence 30 years ...... we must protect our money and the rich at all costs !
Report abuse
The sworn priorities of the Police are the protection of life and property.Please note that LIFE comes first,has always come first and will always come first with the British Police duties.If only some people knew what they were talking about on here and you could have an informed debate.Sadly,rarely the case
Report abuse
Violence is violence and cannot be tolerated in society.
The courts should spend less time locking up people for non violent offences where community sentencing and fines etc would suffice.
Then there'd be more than adequate room for violent offenders and drug addicts who are prolific offenders to support habits, sex offenders and the like, who require incarceration to protect the public and kids.
People who are like Tweed, shouldn't be able to stick 2 fingers up at the law when afforded leniency first time around, then be patted on the back with a "There there chap, we sympathise.".
Simply because he may, or may not, have been stressed by Jade's illness, doesn't mean he can flip out and get an even more lenient sentence than one he just had a spin on and got tagged early.
He needs a good term inside treated like every other violent offender and also given anger management as part of remission or parole conditions.
Bally ludicrous the manner violent nut jobs and rapists and child sex offenders are almost pandered to.
Somebody who isn't a drug addict burgles a house, well that's a serious crime alright but if nobody gets physically hurt then non custodial approaches should be tried first, tax evaders, people not paying community charge etc, none should be jailed for those offences and similar.
Prisons should be there for the worst elements of society, too many low level and non violent offenders are jailed and it's no wonder there's an overcrowding problem, if courts didn't put so much emphasis on teaching object lessons for those committing property crime, there's be more room for those who need to be locked up.
People are more important than property or money, those commiting crimes against the person should be properly sentenced to custodial terms long enough to address and influence aberrrant behaviours to something more acceptable and no exceptions no release on tags until earliest parole dates and parole candidates properly assessed for suitability to early release else they serve full remission terms or full term if not reforming in the prison system, not so many locked up for owing money or low level crimes but hurt nobody!
Nuff said, end of story!
My handle on it all.
Report abuse
Oh. I say hurt nobody in the physical sense, of course there's emotional and psychological harms, but ye get me drift loike.
Report abuse
yes i think he should be locked away for longer.he dosent seem to learn although he was in prision.the general public have to be protected this guy tweed.seem's to be laughing at the justice system.
Report abuse
The Courts in this Country are pathetic, very few punishments fit the Crime, which was committed! And if the Judge has the strength, give a good sentance, their is some one or other who will stand up for the person being delt with.Discepline is a thing of the past, and a justified term,is never given because of the weakness of the judical, powers in Britain! Thats why the jails are FULL : Human Rights, Prisoner's Rights, and other known Organisations, who medal or interfear, should be stopped.
Report abuse
the justice system in this country is a joke, please explain why we can't bring back the death penalty, i know there will be a lot of responce to this, but we have the technology with DNA where there should be no mistakes made when getting a conviction on a murder charge ect then there would be no reason to say we have no room in prison for your crime but to just make a example we will give you 12wks but you can just do 6wks. if your famous or know someone/related to a famous person you'll serve less time, if jack tweed assault someone else whilst out on license for the same offence then what is he capable of doing when he,s not being monitored, also the general public have to take some blame for these people being allowed to walk our streets because when the goverment put forward a proposal for new prisons to be built we protest, we should follow america like we do with everything else( ie:- iraq! ) and give out tougher sentences, once over life ment life with no chance of being freed ( ie:- hindly/brady ) whats happened to our society it seems as though its being run by the ciminals of today not the goverment, come on mr brown get a back bone and stand up to these yobs then the rest of the country will follow we can't do this on our own
Report abuse
the rich dont go to prison thats a well known fact.
Report abuse