Most teachers must
have been cringing as they watched the news this week. On Monday we saw
26-year-old music teacher, Helen Goddard, jailed for 15 months for having
sexual relations with one of her underage female pupils. Then on Wednesday we
heard from Buckingham University vice-chancellor, Terence Kealey, who suggested
that female students were a ‘perk' of the job to be enjoyed by male academics.
Are teachers being shown The Graduate as part of their training nowadays?
I'll get the disclaimer out of the way early on. Obviously there are many talented, dedicated teachers who take their profession very seriously and are capable of leaving their sex lives at home but there are certainly more than a few letting the side down.
I also need to be careful not to draw too many comparisons between Helen Goddard and Terence Kealey because what Goddard did was illegal, whereas Kealey's comments were just, in my book, pretty damn stupid, not to mention ill-timed.
In his article for The Times Higher Education magazine Kealey wrote: "Normal girls - more interested in abs than in labs, more interested in pecs than specs, more interested in triceps than tripods - will abjure their lecturers for the company of their peers, but nonetheless, most male lecturers know that, most years, there will be a girl in class who flashes her admiration and who asks for advice on her essays. What to do?
"Enjoy her! She's a perk."
He continued: "She doesn't yet know that you are only Casaubon to her Dorothea, Howard Kirk to her Felicity Phee, and she will flaunt you her curves. Which you should admire daily to spice up your sex, nightly, with the wife... As in Stringfellows, you should look but not touch."
Dr Kealey's comments were slammed by Olivia Bailey, women's officer at the National Union of Students who told the Telegraph: "I am appalled that a university vice chancellor should display such an astounding lack of respect for women."
Kealey argued his article was "highly moral", and that its purpose had been to point out the inappropriateness of staff-student relationships by using humour.
"Regardless of whether this was an attempt at humour," said Ms Bailey, "it is completely unacceptable for someone in Terence Kealey's position to compare a lecture theatre to a lapdancing club, and I expect that many women studying at Buckingham University will be feeling extremely angry and insulted at these comments."
The females Kealey refers to are women above the age of 18, which make his comments somewhat less harmful, especially when compared to the actions of Helen Goddard but whether he meant them in jest or not they are still harmful to a profession that is built on trust. Parents send their children to school and university for an education, not to be ogled by staff, and teachers have a responsibility to act professionally. Once a teacher starts seeing pupils in a sexual light it's a slippery slope - just ask Ms Goddard.
The more cases like this that emerge the less trusting parents will be of teachers and the cries for tougher vetting of staff at schools will only get louder. Nobody wants to get to the stage where teachers are no longer allowed to be alone in a room with a pupil but that's the way I can see us heading thanks to the irresponsible few who are meddling with the inappropriate.
Editor's Corner
Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! All rights reserved.
Notice: We collect personal information on this site. To learn more about how we use your information, see our: Updated Privacy Policy
It always amazes me as a former teacher, that Chris Woodhead the previous Chief Inspector of Schools is still invited by the BBC and other networks to comment on controvertial issues in education. Having admitted to having sex with pupils, which he described as 'an enriching experience for all', he would today appear on the Sex Offenders Register.
We should still remember that the reason this instance of breach of trust is so shocking is that it is so rare.
Report abuse
Dr Kealey was making a joke, one has only to watch pupils coming off the school bus to see yong girls dressed up like hookers, theres's little wrong with admiring the scenery, its understanding that that is wherethe admiration stops. Perhaps it's time we stopped taking ourselves quite so seriously. If parents feel upset by Dr Kealey
Report abuse
Dr Kealey was making a joke, one has only to watch pupils coming off the school bus to see yong girls dressed up like hookers, theres's little wrong with admiring the scenery, its understanding that that is wherethe admiration stops. Perhaps it's time we stopped taking ourselves quite so seriously. If parents feel upset by Dr Kealey, then they should ensure their kids stick to properly worn school uniform, and university students might remind themselves that they are there to learn, not going to a nightclub.
Report abuse
As female teacher I am constantly amazed by what parents think is appropriate dress for school. Girls with very tight trousers that slide down at every opportunity, skirts so short that they skim the backside. Boys with their trousers hanging to reveal their underpants. (What's with that one?) Make-up so thick the girls looks like an old Tango advert. I wear office dress for school, so do my colleagues. School is not a sexual peep show. Everyone should be dressed appropriately for a day working not a day oggling. Aren't evenings and weekends enough?
Report abuse
If you are going for Muslem Shiria law why not chop accademics hands of for theft of our tax money?
Report abuse
Lazevnik: You obviously had a bed time at school and judge everything by your experience. I would say the majority of today's "educators" are in the job because they actually love teaching and want their students to have better lives. Unfortunately, the VERY small minority take advantage of their positions and lead the profession into disrepute.
There are many laws in place to stop "educators" from treating their students as objects, but that also means that many students don't get the PROPER attention they need.
I had a brilliant teacher when I was at school, but in today's society and under the existing laws he would be dismissed and would face criminal charges.
I agree somewhat with hopkins374; blame has to fall (in part) on the parents. If they made their children follow the dress code, there wouldn't be so many problems. However, that can also be said for the students and the school itself. If the staff were to enforce the dress code at school, there would be no problems with "provocatively" dressed students.
Report abuse
Look at the comments of teacher elaine_damian above full of swear-words that have been blocked out.
This is the type of language that is being forced upon our children be these evil parasites.
Report abuse
bintang112003
Analyse at your own comment (quoted below) I that it shows the hypocrisy of your support for the parasites!
'I had a brilliant teacher when I was at school, but in today's society and under the existing laws he would be dismissed and would face criminal charges.'
Report abuse
As an Advanced Skills Teacher, I fully support what 'bingtang112003' said above. The problem with the view by 'lazevnik' is that, first, it illustrates how the stupid, unintelligent mind reads these kinds of media stories (suggesting that the whole education system is corrupt and we should do away with it altogether via abolition of its institutions, thus return to the Stone Age); and, second, it feeds off the media frenzy surrounding a minority of 'sick and stupid' individuals, who do not represent the majority of the profession. It is typical of the media to focus on these to shock, sensationalise and entertain. It is typical of the media to focus on the bad and the ugly rather than the good, as that sell newspapers. However, the media would then accuse me of generalising about them! Well, that is exactly what the media has made ignorant people like 'lazenvik' do: to generalise about educationalists! I would suggest that people like the Vice Chancellor of Buckingham University display a bit more intelligence that is presupposed by their post; that more is done by the media to celebrate the excellent work done by the majority of educationalists than emboss the immoral antics of the minority; and that people like 'lazenvik' try visiting these institutions before making stupid, crass assertions in public forums that could misinform equally obtuse minds that are equally disillusioned with our education system.
Report abuse
Anyone who calls themselves "Ms" is always going to be feeling extremely angry and insulted at these comments.
Others can see the satire.
If the media stopped the paedo-phobia then the Miss Jean Brodiesque actions of some would be regarded as the rare occurrences they are and whilst shocking are not the reason to stigmatize every teacher or adult.
Report abuse