Search

Yahoo! News Editor

Microsoft to support anonymous browsing

Tue Aug 26 10:47AM
Microsoft officials have confirmed that the company is to introduce a way for users to surf the Web anonymously.

As part of the upcoming Internet Explorer 8 release, Microsoft is incorporating 'inPrivate' - a mode that will not record visits to the user's history and will not allow sites to place cookies on the user's system. Apple currently offers a similar service with its Safari browser.

Many industry pundits haven't wasted any time in pointing out one of the most obvious uses of the feature, nicknaming it 'porn mode,' highlighting the ability to view adult sites without leaving a trail for employers or family members to follow.

There have also been questions raised over the helpfulness of the latest release, which could make it harder for police to track Internet users that are viewing harmful or illegal websites.

On a recent posting to the official IE blog though, Microsoft officials put forward some more innocent uses of the new release:

"Have you ever wanted to take your web browsing 'off the record'? Perhaps you're using someone else's computer and you don't want them to know which sites you visited. Maybe you need to buy a gift for a loved one without ruining the surprise. Maybe you're at an Internet kiosk and don't want the next person using it to know at which website you bank."

Obviously the new Internet Explorer will have pros and cons but my question to you is: Should the Internet be completely private or should our movements be traceable? 

Comments211 - 220 of 247

  1. Ok Ok, here it is in large letters so you plonkers that are worried about peadofiles, terrorists, cheating husband, etc, can get to grips with the reality of this new browser from microsoft. WHEN YOU TURN ON YOUR COMPUTER AND CONNECT TO THE INTERNET, YOUR EXTERNAL INERNET PROTOCOL(IP) ADDRESS, THE ONE THAT LOOKS LIKE A LOAD OF NUMBERS EG:00.000.00.000, IS BROADCASTED TO YOUR INTERNET SUPPLIER(ISP). WHEN YOU USE THAT IP ADDRESS TO VISIT ANY SITE ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD, YOUR ISP IS MADE AWARE OF THIS, EVEN THOSE WITH IP CHANGING PROGRAMS DONT GET AWAY WITH THIS, AS YOUR IP FROM YOUR ADDRESS ALWAYS REMAINS THE SAME, THE ONLY PARTY THAT GETS THE CHANGED IP IS THE SITE YOUR VISITING. THE NEW VERSION OF IE ONLY ALLOWS INTERNAL SECRECY ON YOUR OWN COMPUTER AND HAS NO BAREING ON THE EXTERNAL NETWORK KNOWN AS THE INTERNET OR YOUR ISP'S LOGGING SYSTEM. IT SIMPLY STOPS THIRD PARTY COOKIES AND HISTORY BEING ADDED TO YOUR COMPUTER. THIS BY NO MEANS A RESPITE FOR ANY ILLEGIMITATE ACTIVITY. IF ANYTHING IT WILL LUL PEOPLE INTO A FALSE SENSE OF SECURITY AND ENABLE THE ENTRAPMENT OF SAID PEOPLE. I hope that clears things up as a lot of you people are just worried about nothing and are double posting the same stuff over and over. have to agree with the post about the british govnt taxing it tho. well said my man

    tvirus100 From tvirus100 on Tue Aug 26 06:34PM

    Report abuse

  2. i think its a good idea. Though what should do is make it so only people like the police can track were you have been and nobody else, something like that. ^^

    transformeramber From transformeramber on Tue Aug 26 06:36PM

    Report abuse

  3. I agree its a bad idea. Too many people abuse the net already, if anything there should be more tracking and monitoring. Maybe then there will be less children being abused by peodophiles and also less children visiting adult websites that they shouldnt be. More strict rules are the way forward, not the opposite way. Should be stopped.

    gina.fryer From gina.fryer on Tue Aug 26 06:39PM

    Report abuse

  4. And to add for those people worried about children visiting sites they shouldn't be. Microsoft installed a security feature that allows you to restrict what children visit by adding a password system. If you look at the tools menu in IE and then internet options you will see something called content advisor that allows you to restrict what sites can be viewed without the password. Yes this can be a pain in the back side but its there for a reason

    tvirus100 From tvirus100 on Tue Aug 26 06:43PM

    Report abuse

  5. If the internet was ACTUALLY policed, then this update would not be required

    In fact, it will actually make it HARDER to police.

    Absolute visibility into everyones activities is the only way to ensure fairness and that no person is being exploited via this medium.

    If the policing were adequate, then I ask you all...what do you have to hide that you are so scared to display?

    Microsoft need to create a system for policing and then give it to an unbiased authority, not allow people to surf in anonimity.

    kellya84 From kellya84 on Tue Aug 26 06:48PM

    Report abuse

  6. Anyone who believes you can be anonymous online is a fool. The fact that someone wrote the program means that someone else will find a simple way to hack it. And do you really believe the police, intelligence, etc., agencies would not still be able to work out where you have been? Big brother rules the roost and don't you ever forget it! Freedom is a state of mind not a corporeal reality. Sorry to rain on your parade...but it's true.

    dguardbrown From dguardbrown on Tue Aug 26 06:49PM

    Report abuse

  7. This is a good step from Microsoft, and will not affect the tracking of paedophiles and terrorists.

    Internet service providers log internet activity, so although not logged on your PC it will still be trackable by law enforcement.

    In the corporate enviroment, users are usually tracked by all traffic going through a 'proxy' server, that logs every webpage you visit.

    What this will help stop is spy/malware, session tracking cookies that hijack your browser and slow it down and install unwanted software in internet explorer.

    gojonnyfry From gojonnyfry on Tue Aug 26 06:54PM

    Report abuse

  8. i like custard :-)

    jp_birdman From jp_birdman on Tue Aug 26 06:56PM

    Report abuse

  9. I think it's a good feature, however it is something that an administrator should be able to disable/enable. For instance, in the work place the employer might need to know what staff do online. In this case the network administrator should be able to disable"inPrivate" so employees cannot turn it on.

    ministe2003 From ministe2003 on Tue Aug 26 06:59PM

    Report abuse

  10. @#$% and lies, we still will have no privacy. If anyone believes that microsoft wont still have access to absolutely everythin we do on our pc's then ur dumber than u think. It might not keep records on that individual computer but as far as government 'security' there will still be 100% access as per usual with any online computer. If your pc can connect ot he web then the governments know exactly what ur doing

    grahamroxuk From grahamroxuk on Tue Aug 26 07:09PM

    Report abuse

Comment on this article

Please sign in to add your comments.


Add to my Yahoo/RSS

Latest UK news

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! All rights reserved.

Notice: We collect personal information on this site. To learn more about how we use your information, see our: Updated Privacy Policy