Search

politics.co.uk

What Susan Boyle says about the UK

Mon Jun 01 12:10PM
Susan Boyle is on her way to the Priory clinic today, just another shattered victim of our obsession with celebrity.

Earlier in the weekend, Gordon Brown had this to say: "I hope Susan Boyle is OK because she is a really, really nice person and I think she will do well."

It's the latest prime ministerial intervention in celebrity. During her dying days, Jade Goody was treated to his approval, when he praised her determination "to help her family". A while earlier, he had claimed to wake up to the Arctic Monkeys every morning, a fact most people treated with considerable disbelief.

None of this chimes particularly well with his insistence Britain had started to overcome celebrity, just before becoming prime minister.

Keen to highlight his superiority over Tony Blair, the then-chancellor said: "I think we're moving from this period when, if you like, celebrity matters, when people have become famous for being famous."

If only that was true.

This country has developed an increasingly unhealthy relationship with celebrity. We have always built people up to knock them down, but we now appear to be doing it with a ruthless speed and an utter indifference to their mental state.

Watching Boyle appear on Britain's Got Talent over the weekend was a case in point. After a week of newspaper stories about her increasingly deranged behaviour, she appeared fragile and vulnerable. Her expressions were nervous and indicated a desperation to please, while her mannerisms came across as odd and jolted.

She was, for all to see, just another victim of the celebrity machine. It sucks them in, uses them, and then spits them out: used and worthless.

Some of the blame can be placed on the format of reality television. Big Brother set the tone a decade ago, when it filmed people in an enclosed space for days on end and forced them to vote against each other, before the audience themselves chose who got kicked out. Then talent shows, heavily reliant on a judging panel made up of, ironically, thoroughly talentless but hugely vindictive narcissists, sealed the deal.

Contestants were ushered on, so the audience could bask in the stream of vitriolic unpleasantness emitted from the judges. Gone was politeness, or caring for people's feelings. Cruelty and sneering were in fashion.

But it's not just the format. We are responsible as well. Our obsession with celebrity has now reached a kind of tipping point. Even the expenses scandal was thought appropriate for celebrity fixes, with Esther Rantzen and other D-listers quickly cited as replacements for MPs. What on earth would make us think they would be any less greedy, or incompetent? What possible reason could there be to presume such a thing, unless the country has gradually come to the conclusion that 'celebrity=good', as a form of a priori reasoning.

Broadsheets and glossy celebrity mags seem to live a world apart, but they are in fact two sides of the same coin.

As we become increasingly disillusioned with politics, we turn to the empty world of celebrity to distract ourselves. But in this world, somewhere, are real people. They have feelings, and hopes and aspirations. They are very much like you and I.

When we package them up and sell them - much as Boyle was constructed as a fairy story character - and then ruthlessly tear them down, we damage them. And we also damage ourselves.

When the television shows and magazines and newspapers allow people to talk to others this way - calling Heather Mills a 'slag', for instance - it has a direct effect on the way people treat each other in society.

Children take their cue from those on television, and what they read. And adults, in a slower, less obvious way, do the same.

This isn't a cry for a more family-friendly, Mary Whitehouse style censorship campaign. It's just a request for a little less cruelty, and a little more compassion, in the way we treat the people who enter the news agenda.

David Cameron hasn't made it part of his 'Broken Britain' agenda, even though the two facts are intimately connected. Gordon Brown will only discuss celebrity to jump on the latest bandwagon.

A real political leader would challenge our views, and try to forge something a little healthier. Both for the celebrities, and for Britain.

Ian Dunt

Comments21 - 30 of 1002

  1. totally agree, most of the 'celebs' nowadays are empty talentless shells anyway, don't watch 'corrie' or 'the square' (childishly abbreviated little nicknames) certainly don't watch @#$%py little talent shows, saw on the news that some 'dance' act had won, great, dancers used to be in the background years ago, well done t.v., you've got nearly everyone in this country obsessed with dance, pity it doesn't do any good as most people who are into it are obese. (public, not the dancers) Why are you all obsessed with celebs anyway? They're not very talented, american films only use british actors when they need to portray a baddie, what better than the english? They love showing us in a bad light, in truth, they hate us, and judging from the way we act, we hate ourselves, sad little island.

    kcharrison From kcharrison on Mon Jun 01 12:47PM

    Report abuse

  2. Yes what did Susan say.

    Its is a shame what the pressure of the celebrity world is doing to her. Was there no councilling given during the making of Britains Got Talent to the contestants, or are they just pushed in front of the world? These stars are only human and thats something we must remember. I just hope that she is getting the help she needs and that we hear more of her excellent vocals, so Susan, get better soon.

    johnjpettitt From johnjpettitt on Mon Jun 01 12:49PM

    Report abuse

  3. very valid point.but i think he's wrong about Esther Rantzen.As someone who has campained and been the figurehead for charities such as childline, she knows she importance of money to the community

    dr3w_ha From dr3w_ha on Mon Jun 01 12:50PM

    Report abuse

  4. Yeah im sure she'll be extremly fragile when the money from newspapers etc comes rolling in...............

    necromonger1975 From necromonger1975 on Mon Jun 01 12:50PM

    Report abuse

  5. Whenever I think the standard of programming on TV cannot get worse I am always proved wrong. We are being served a diet of perpetually downward spiralling dross designed to appeal to the largest audience whatever the cost to the socio-psychological health of the nation. It is a shame that the BBC, who does not depend on advertising revenue, feels that it needs to follow the commercial organisations down into the mire. It is the BBC who must lead standards back up but they will need an imaginative change of leadership to achieve that.

    oakimp From oakimp on Mon Jun 01 12:51PM

    Report abuse

  6. Item 17....you'd be so lucky!

    johnjpettitt From johnjpettitt on Mon Jun 01 12:51PM

    Report abuse

  7. Sad to say that television is like any other buisness with regards to supply and demand. There is obviously a demand for this sort of entertainment. Our society os celebrity obsessed and young people aspire to become famous for the sake of it regardless of what they actually do to acheive this.There are probably hundreds of good role models out there for our children but unfortunately wont ever get the kind of coverage to be able to make an impact on many people. Television is partly to blame but the public themselves are the main reason. If they did not want to watch this kind of rubbish then the television will not broadcast it.

    tommo7756 From tommo7756 on Mon Jun 01 12:51PM

    Report abuse

  8. Ian Dunt has a point, but does it stop there? Consider “Anti Social Behaviour,” which ignores good old fashioned RESPECT for other people. In this case respect is a “two way street” if we cannot show respect how can we expect to receive respect.

    My feeling is that some tabloid newspapers made Susan Boyle an “Aunt Sally” by targeting her and then exaggerating any indiscretion she made, to knock her off the pedestal that the media had made for her.

    The poor woman might well have printed a target on her forehead, once the little people became jealous of her apparent success. May she get well soon and continue to please the majority who appreciate her voice.

    wilhelm_v_pegasus From wilhelm_v_pegasus on Mon Jun 01 12:52PM

    Report abuse

  9. I have heard it said that "we get the government we deserve". Seems to be true with press and media, don't you think? No point blaming the media because the media is only an extension of ourselves. No point blaming politicians for the same reason. If we want things to change then we have to start with ourselves. As someone once said "fault lies with him weak enough to lay blame". We can also take a positive lesson from all the media/politicians @#$%, we can see very clearly how we don't want things to be. Therefore we can decide to do things differently. It is a good time to do that while all the old institutions like banks and policiticians and media are crumbling.

    carlinwilkowski From carlinwilkowski on Mon Jun 01 12:52PM

    Report abuse

  10. Yes, what did Susan Boyle say???????????? I also cannot find it in the article. But as far as celebrity and politeness is concerned, it makes me cringe when I hear wealthy morons who just happen to have the wealth and power of the media destroy people that submit to the brainwashing that us in the UK are so good at. We are brainwashed in so many respects from unelected prime ministers that take the UK into a murderous illegal war to the media whose whole loyalty is to money and little else. The Westminster house of pigs (just another reality show) and a country brought to its knees and we all feel powerless to do anything about it .........

    kev52uk From kev52uk on Mon Jun 01 12:52PM

    Report abuse

Comment on this article

Please sign in to add your comments.


Add to my Yahoo/RSS

Latest UK news

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! All rights reserved.

Notice: We collect personal information on this site. To learn more about how we use your information, see our: Updated Privacy Policy