Developing

Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Chancellor Backs Banking Industry Shake-Up

    George Osborne has backed plans to shake up the banking industry despite warnings that the move could harm the economy.

    The chancellor gave the government's formal approval to ring-fence the country's top retail banks from their riskier investment banking arms, in order to give better protection to taxpayers in case of future financial crises.

    "The government will separate retail and investment banking through a ring-fence," he told parliament.

    Mr Osborne said that the Independent Commission on Banking (ICB) under Sir John Vickers had been created to find an answer to the "British dilemma" of how the country can remain one of the world's leading financial centres without exposing taxpayers to the massive costs of bailing out failed banks.

    He said the Commission had produced an "impressive" final report in September, whose key recommendations he was now committed to putting into effect.

    "Britain should remain home to one of the world's leading financial centres and the home of global banks," he said.

    The ICB had proposed lenders should be forced to split their retail and investment banking arms to help prevent future bailouts.

    The reforms could cost the sector up to £7bn, prompting fears they will slow lending at a time when the economy is in danger of sliding into recession.

    The move will also heighten speculation that some banks will move their head offices away from London, depriving the UK of jobs and tax revenues.

    The news saw shares in Britain's leading banks fall in early morning trade on Monday.

    HSBC was down by 1% and Lloyds dropped 1.8%, while Barclays and the part-nationalised lenders Royal Bank of Scotland both fell 1.9%.

    Business Secretary Vince Cable said on Sunday the Government had accepted the recommendations of the commission.

    "It is absolutely right that we make the British economy safe. We just cannot risk a repetition of the financial catastrophe we had three years ago," he said.

    "Big structural reform of the banks was something we (Liberal Democrats) fought for and argued for and now it is going to happen."

    Mr Osborne will make a statement to MPs after the Treasury has published a response to the ICB report, which includes plans to force banks to hold more capital to help ring-fence them against future crises.

    He is expected to pledge to enact all primary and secondary legislation stemming from the report by the end of the current Parliament, with a white paper expected next year.

    The reforms should be in place by 2019.

    The ICB, chaired by Sir John Vickers, former head of the Office of Fair Trading, was set up by the coalition last year to conduct a full review of the sector after the financial crisis four years ago left banks including Royal Bank of Scotland and Lloyds needing bailouts.

    Its recommendations have not been universally welcomed.

    Commenting ahead of Mr Osborne's announcement, London Mayor Boris Johnson urged the Chancellor: "Just don't kill the goose, don't kill the goose."

    However, he added: "There's no doubt that there's something creepy about the huge bonuses that bankers are still continuing to receive in spite of the fact that they were effectively bailed out by the taxpayer. We all want to see them doing more for society."

    Others do not believe the Vickers report went far enough.

    Tony Greenham, head of finance and business at the New Economics Foundation, said: "We welcome the Government's decision not to water down the Vickers Commission but the ICB's recommendations do not go far or fast enough to stabilise the banking system.

    "2019 is a long time to wait for these reforms and leaves the public exposed in the increasingly likely event of another financial crash - we might have to bail banks out again."

     

    70 comments

    • JMO  •  5 months ago
      All fat cats in all walks of life are greedy -- How much money do they actually need?
      All chancellors are all mouth and no teeth.
      The government should have, on behalf of the taxpayers, taken possesion of all the failed banks fancy properties and let them back at greedy rates.
      • Bert Nodules 5 months ago
        Nationalise the Banks, what a good idea, then the Bankers wouldn't have to work so hard any more, no more 12 hour days, they would get overtime or 5 pm just walk out. Instead of loosing staff constantly for efficiency purposes they could employ as many as they liked You obviously believe what you read in the papers.
      • Scott 5 months ago
        Sorry but bank staff do not work as hard as a miner or even a chef in a busy restaurant. So please do not give me that. Stressful yes because you are expected to make money for the people who already have lots of money but hard work definately not.
      • KEVIN99 5 months ago
        The reason they could not do a complete nationalisation is because the banks have many times more debt on the books than out total national output.
    • MICHAEL  •  5 months ago
      Please do it in such a way that we retrieve all out money and stop the bonus system completely. They get paid a good salary
      • Jupitor 5 months ago
        What about a reverse bonus system - whereby those who lose our money have their salaries docked.
      • jack d 5 months ago
        you do know that your living in a dream world
      • MICHAEL 5 months ago
        nightmare more like it
    • ZIONIST  •  5 months ago
      Bet the new rules is so sloppily drawn up that the banks can drive a horse and cart through them.
      • paul 5 months ago
        more like a boeing 777
    • A Yahoo! User  •  5 months ago
      By the time it happens in around 8 years time the banking lobby will have watered it down so much nothing will change osbourne is a #$%$
    • Goldwing 1500  •  5 months ago
      I've sussed these b'stds out, their going to bugger this country up so much that whoever is in the chair next time, they won't be able to clear it up, and will then take the blame for the state of the country. Typical of their class,- - - - very clever but no bloody common sense.
      • PETER 5 months ago
        You are a bit behind the times Goldwing. I sussed that out before the last General Election.
      • Big Geordie 5 months ago
        Peter you are 100% correct that's exactly what Maggie and Major did!
      • anon 5 months ago
        It also happened in the 1960's with, i think MacMillan and Maudling, Wilson was left was left with a Tory mess to clear up.
    • Mike  •  5 months ago
      The split is probably a necessity but it is being used as a red-herring to avoid tackling the root problems which arise from a combination of poor governance (by B of E, FSA, Government and Parliament), and selective morality as to the definition/interpretation of the word dishonesty. But this would attack the establishment and privileged who live on the cream produced by society through inheritance and nepotism whilst enjoying the spoils of the unscrupulous (including the Banking sector).
      When are we going to have a public enquiry in to "re-hypothecation" - which the law doesn't seem to consider 'illegal' - which seems to be oneof the tools used during the financial collapse, which is essentially fraudulently dishonest. Wake up Osbourne!
      • D.DW 5 months ago
        He's awake alright, Mike, busy lining his and his cronies' pockets; it's those who voted for him - and for Thatcher - who need to wake up.
    • D.DW  •  5 months ago
      'something creepy about the huge bonuses that bankers are continuing to receive' says Boris. Something which should be illegal might be the comment of most of us.
      Five years to implement the new legislation. Effectively it is 'business as usual' for the thieving bankers.
    • Nigel J  •  5 months ago
      The first thing that should happen is to bring the likes of Fred Goodwin and his crony accomplices back to the UK to face the judiciary system. Once convicted of corporate fraud (that's what it is by definition) they should face the consequences of a long term jail sentence and have their assets stripped. This is what the US judiciary did to Bernie Madoff over there!
      While this due process is going on, the government should implement immediately (not at some distant time in the future) legislation to control the activities of bankers and dramatically curb the bonus culture. This will halt this "greed frenzy" that the bankers have become accustomed and feel entitled to. If they don't like it then they have enough ill gotten gains to emigrate - we do not want corporate crooks here in the UK masquerading as "financial experts"!!!!!!
    • malcolm  •  5 months ago
      What a load of pointless saber rattling. We all know what yellow streaked cowards occupy our Parliament when it comes to facing and dressing down bankers for the benefit of the people. They are too afraid of losing their party funding.; They disgust the nation.
    • TonyH  •  5 months ago
      The head of H.M.R.C,has already let big corperations get away with 7 billion pounds in taxes while harassing pensioners for peanuts in comparision, the goverment seems to think thats acceptable.
    • red away from henrietta  •  5 months ago
      they say this move will upset the economy.what economy,start investing in JOBS & PEOPLE osbourne.STOP supporting ANY banks that pay bonuses for FAILURE.
    • Prof  •  5 months ago
      I looked up the word "Osbourne" in the dictionary it said "Bankers lap dog"
    • El-Tony.  •  5 months ago
      This Government is going to do nothing to upset the City bank and bakers.
      Ols school nepotism and nudge, nudge wink, wink,,, say no more.
      As for moving out of the country, none of the employees would leave end of and we all know it.
    • phil  •  5 months ago
      George Osborne could'nt shake a babies rattle let alone the banks
    • Geoff  •  5 months ago
      The ICB report is long overdue and why will it take until 2019 to get it implemented. Do it immediately ! Forget about the banks squealing they will move abroad, it's just bluff because they won't, neither will their overpaid exexcutives leaves their cosy homes and perks here. if I gambled with my bosses money and lost it I would be sacked, yet that is exactly what these so called financial 'executives' are doing with investors money. Sack the executives who failed, it will concentrate the minds of the rest.
    • IAS  •  5 months ago
      2019?? The bankers are ALWAYS given enough rope to Strangle the hardworking 'ordinary' folk!! Politicians still are NOT doing enough to Change these type of Bankers!!

      Why can't FAIRNESS be for ALL?

      Bankers will now try to get as much as they can from us in order to sustain their own financial wealth!! This is political WEAKNESS at its worst!!
    • freedommmmmmmmmmmmmmm fro ...  •  5 months ago
      and another thing comeon to grips people lets all stand united as one country and get rid of those no use money grabbing mps and stuck up snobby bast£"$% once n for all.
    • M  •  5 months ago
      Another piece of gutless and useless regulation by yet another gutless and useless government. Judging by what I have seen and read over the last few years the whole investment/financial sector should be moved overseas - Bikini Atholl would seem an appropriate venue.
    • JOHN  •  5 months ago
      This Coalition Government would be ideal material for a new series of Spitting Image.
    • Reg  •  5 months ago
      ALL BANKS should be Nationalised - State owned and State Controlled, from the Bank of England down to the High Street banks.