Developing

Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Clarkson's Ex: Injunction Was 'Terrifying'

    Jeremy Clarkson's ex-wife has said it was "terrifying" when she discovered the Top Gear presenter had taken out an injunction over a book she planned about "knowing someone famous".

    Giving evidence to a parliamentary committee, Alex Hall defended the right of family members and former lovers to write publicly about their lives with celebrities.

    She told MPs and peers who are examining the issue of privacy and the way injunctions work: "Why should I not be allowed to talk about my life? It is a free country."

    But she clarified: "There is a moral issue as a married couple not to publish certain aspects, or salacious detail."

    Ms Hall said her marriage to Clarkson ended before he was famous but she "maintained a relationship" with him.

    The Joint Committee on Privacy and Injunctions heard how she texted the TV host to tell him she was planning a book "about knowing someone famous like that and the impact it had had on my and my family's lives".

    Ms Hall said she hoped to write a "witty self-help book" but described how Clarkson told her: "I won't have anyone write anything about me. I have a right to privacy."

    Ms Hall explained how a week later she received a late-night injunction that left her "shaking".

    She said: "I had no idea about what to do with this injunction, it was just terrifying."

    She added: "He assumed because I am a shy mini mouse I would do nothing about it. He assumed I would kowtow to the bullying and not fight it."

    The committee heard she could only afford to oppose the injunction by seeking help from lawyers acting on a no-win, no-fee basis.

    But Ms Hall then described how Clarkson suddenly removed the injunction, describing his behaviour afterwards as "hugely cavalier" and traumatic for her family.

    When quizzed about what public interest would have been served by her book, she responded: "It's not a public interest thing.

    "But the public would be interested in my different perspective being married to Jeremy Clarkson."

    She also reduced the committee to giggles responding to a question about how the whole saga might change the book's content. "I suppose there's another chapter now, isn't there?" she replied.

    Her lawyer Charlotte Harris from Mischon de Reya Solicitors agreed that the current system of injunctions meant "there are abuses on both sides" and backed the idea of mediation as one way to solve that.

    The evidence session is expected to be the last held by the committee, which is due to report on the issues of privacy and injunctions at the end of the month.

     

    21 comments

    • * ScottishGirl*  •  London, England  •  3 months ago
      "Terrifying"... god help her if she ever has anything real to worry about...
      • john f 3 months ago
        Hi Beth he wouldn't terrify you,it would be the other way round.
      • * ScottishGirl* 3 months ago
        Haha John...I wouldn't have told him I was doing it in the first place !!
      • john f 3 months ago
        Surprise is the element of attack Beth.
    • pebbles  •  3 months ago
      she didn't have a life with a celebrity, they were divorced before Clarkson was known, she' just hanging onto his shirttails to make a quick buck
    • john f  •  Sheffield, England  •  3 months ago
      He must have been terrified of her letting the cat out of the bag,hasn't got a driving licence.
      • * ScottishGirl* 3 months ago
        or maybe she took some speeding points for him :)
      • john f 3 months ago
        Wouldn't surprise me maybe some for Hammond as well.
    • JasonD  •  3 months ago
      The worst part of this is the famous wealthier former spouse/lover can stop production of things while they can write their tell alls after their fame trickles away with little chance of anyone being able to stop them unless they are more famous and wealthier...thats not a free country, thats a richest wins country
    • SKELLY  •  3 months ago
      (Jeremy Clarkson's ex-wife has said it was "terrifying")...... terrifying is a home invasion - an armed robber - not an injunction issued by the courts ! When will these non celebs learn the use of the english language ? Never as long as a big payout is on the cards !
      • Wombat 3 months ago
        Really? What if someone got a court order preventing you doing something? - I bet you'd be bricking it inside two seconds.
      • SKELLY 3 months ago
        NOT IN MY LIFETIME !
    • PAUL  •  Birmingham, England  •  3 months ago
      Some on here dont seem to understand how terrifying it would be to have agents of the state turn up in the middle of the night serving you with papers which forbade you from writing about your life. Total misuse of Court powes in my opinion.
    • NEVILLE  •  Birmingham, England  •  3 months ago
      yawn
    • robert l  •  Watford, England  •  3 months ago
      GROW UP you stupid woman no wonder clarkson gave you the boot [terrifying] words fail me
    • Father Stack  •  London, England  •  3 months ago
      Hmmmm......I cant decide who is the most pointless #$%$Clarkson or his ex-wife.
    • Terry Mac  •  3 months ago
      What's terrifying is if you're on the motorway when old Jezza or his cohorts are throttling to the max and their concentration isn't what it should be, but I've said time and time again that petrolheads are asking for trouble when driving one-handed.

      Husky sounding car engines and sexy body contours may turn them on, however it's also likely to turn their car over and that of anyone in their path. Keep the little stiffys for when you're reading Autocar, lads.
    • Satan's Cheerleader  •  Romford, England  •  3 months ago
      Clarksons ex wife wants to write a book to make wads of cash. She is a parasite. If she truly sees herself as a writer then why not write a book about something else?. Why doesn't she do this? because nobody would give a hoot. She is no better than a page 3 kiss and tell daily newspaper tart. She wants to maintain the lifestyle she had when married to him and the only way she can do this is by hanging hers and his dirty laundry in public. Disgraceful.
      • ANTHONY 3 months ago
        The smell of money?
      • Girosnooty 3 months ago
        Cut the preaching JASON your always at it
      • Satan's Cheerleader 3 months ago
        David. are you confusing me with another jason possibly?
    • William R  •  3 months ago
      JUST ANOTHER LOUD MOUTHED YOB,BARKSON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    • Michael Stagg  •  Bristol, England  •  3 months ago
      Ah fame, avoided that one.
    • mikeM  •  London, England  •  3 months ago
      Did he ask her to take his speeding points for him ?
    • Stevonymo  •  London, England  •  3 months ago
      Terrifying!!! Come her love I'll show you something terrifying...ZZzzzzziiiip thud!
    • Stingo  •  St Albans, England  •  3 months ago
      Clarkson can have as much privacy as he claims to have a right to - get thee to a monastery you turbo-charged oaf.
    • JACK LLEWELYN  •  London, England  •  3 months ago
      Ahhhhhhhhhhhh Bless.....
    • Super 6-2  •  St Albans, England  •  3 months ago
      What's Yer Number #$%$
    • David  •  St Albans, England  •  3 months ago
      Of course it was love... you stupid cow.... She must be short of a bit of cash at the moment..
    • Andrew  •  3 months ago
      I once stood in a queue with Jimmy Corkhill off Brookside. I think i might write a book about it and make some wonga