Developing

Yahoo!. Now with Friends.

Discover news, videos and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Costa Cruises offers compensation to rescued passengers

    ROME (Reuters) - Costa Cruises has offered 11,000 euros (9,000 pounds) in compensation to each of the more than 3,000 passengers aboard its liner that ran aground and capsized two weeks ago, Italian consumer groups said on Friday.

    The offer is an attempt by Costa Cruises to limit the legal fallout of the accident off the coast of Italy.

    Each passenger on the Costa Concordia will also receive a refund on the cruise and the costs of their return home. The offer applies to all passengers, whether child or adult, who suffered no physical injuries.

    Injured passengers will be dealt with individually.

    Sixteen bodies have been recovered after the 290-metre long cruise liner, with more than 4,200 passengers and crew on board, struck a rock near the Tuscan island of Giglio.

    The ship's captain, Francesco Schettino, is under house arrest and is blamed for causing the accident by steering too close to the island's shore.

    Costa Cruises' U.S. parent company Carnival Plc is already facing legal action for compensation. Those accepting Friday's offer will have to agree to drop all future litigation, and receive payment within seven days.

    Codacons, a consumer group which did not participate in the negotiations, is collecting names for a class action suit to be filed in Miami requesting 125,000 euros for each passenger.

    Carlo Rienzi, president of Codacons, said the offer was insufficient and urged passengers to see a doctor to check whether they had suffered psychological trauma.

    John Arthur Eaves, a U.S. personal injury lawyer, is urging passengers to file individual lawsuits in the United States. Eaves represented families of some of those killed when a U.S. military jet struck and severed cables holding skiers in a cable car in northern Italy in 1998, killing 20.

    "The class action is not the right tool for this case," Eaves told Reuters Television. "In this case people need to be treated like individuals. Everyone in this boat had different damages."

    But Roberto Corbella, head of Italy's association of tour operators, and who helped Costa negotiate the offer with the consumer protection groups, urged passengers to accept it.

    "Lawsuits have uncertain outcomes, they take a long time, there are legal costs, and some studies indicate that it's not at all certain that passengers would get more than the company is offering," he said.

    "DANGEROUS CONDITIONS"

    Crew member Gary Lobaton has already filed a lawsuit against Carnival in a U.S. district court. His lawyers said in his court filing that he was not aware of the "dangerous conditions" of the cruise ship until it was too late to abandon it safely.

    Keiko Guest, a photographer from Atlanta, was a passenger on the Concordia and she said she may consider the offer as long as the equipment she lost was covered by it.

    "If they would return my stuff to me alongside this money offer I'd feel better," she said. "I don't know how appealing it will be for some people" who lost $10,000 rings.

    Passengers have complained the evacuation was chaotic, with some left waiting in lifeboats for two hours before being able to leave the ship. Several bodies were found by divers in submerged evacuation assembly points, wearing life vests.

    On Thursday, Italy's top-ranking Coast Guard official, Marco Brusco, said Schettino lost "a precious hour" which made evacuating the ship more difficult.

    Had the order been given earlier "the lifeboats could have been launched calmly, people could have been reassured", Brusco said in Senate testimony.

    As divers searched the submerged parts of the ship, Dutch salvage team SMIT finalised preparations to remove fuel from its tanks.

    "We could finish today the process of inserting valves on six tanks," said a spokesman for the civil protection agency, which is in charge of operations. That would open the way for fuel removal to begin on Saturday or Sunday.

    Many other toxic materials are still onboard the Concordia, including a tonne of chlorine to disinfect pools, insecticides, and detergents, according to a list of products distributed by Italian officials. ($1 = 0.7601 euros)

    (Additional reporting by Emilio Parodi on Giglio, Gabriele Pileri in Rome, and Tom Hals in Wilmington, Delaware.; Editing by Myra MacDonald)

     
    • Ivan  •  Uxbridge, England  •  28 days ago
      what about the staff who lost their lives.........???
    • Youareawful  •  28 days ago
      £9.000 and 30% of your next cruise for going through the traumatic experience of being on a sinking ship and seeing people die.
      £936.000 for being a director of RBS and sitting on your arse all day - can anyone else see something wrong here.
    • ss1.  •  Hemel Hempstead, England  •  28 days ago
      Sounds like their trying to buy a cheap 'Get-out-off-Jail' card to me
    • J  •  Bristol, England  •  27 days ago
      The accident, no one can dispute the ship veered to near to the Isle of Scole, pictures of wreckage left there by the Costa Concordia proves this was the place of impact! (On the port side towards the rear).Once an accident has occurred, you then have to address the problem! Questions like what has happened, damage report, delegating officers to #$%$ the situation etc this all takes time!Once reports are made back to the bridge, a prewritten coarse of action is taken or indeed a valuation of the problem #$%$ed and to be acted on accordingly.Coarse of action, the ship sailed on, back in to deeper water, when it became clear what damage the vessel had sustained, the bridge took the decision to go about ( a u turn ) and sail the vessel nearer the shore (this ultimately saved lives) the channel between Giglio and the mainland is pretty deep ( I have electronic cartography, maps).Now the ship is facing south and starting to list, when the ship as reached shallower waters and but still floating the anchors are deployed to hold the ship fast! The order was then given to abandon ship, a multi lingual lady was summoned to the bridge to convey messages in different languages on the ships tanoy and life boats were deployed to start the evacuation!The ship now listing to starboard, be it because the ships hull is in to shallow a water and has bottomed out or indeed the weight of the passengers on one side as caused the ship to become top heavy (4000 people weigh an awful lot when a ship is on the bottom and no longer buoyant!!No one can excuse the loss of life, but well over 4300 were on board, and all but a few were saved, it really is just short of a miracle!Has long as we have cars, ship, planes, machines etc there will be accidents, mistakes, negligence we are all at risk (sit in your home, wrap yourself in cotton wool, and go nowhere, do nothing, I think not, life is an adventure)The only thing I hope, when there is a dreadful loss of life, is that we learn from our mistakes, some good will come of it, so the people who lossed their lives did not die in vain! Take the Herald of Free Enterprise disaster, no ships are allowed to go to sea with the bow doors open (alarms, warning lights on the bridge flash/sound) if only!The designers of this ship done a good job, the crew done a good job and most importantly the ship done its job!!
    • john  •  28 days ago
      Defiitely a derisory offer which should be rejected out of hand as this offer is just an attempt by Costa to avoid paying out substancial and justifiedd compension through their own or their employees negligence-.... Regardless of if a passenger escaped without any injury it will almost certainly cost more £9000 just to replace their lost possessions and does not even take into account the aguish and mental suffering of every individual even if they did escape from the sinking ship. The minimum compensation should be at least £90,000 plus.
    • John  •  28 days ago
      They are having a laugh aren’t they, I’m surprised the UK passengers were not offered £250 of ASDA vouchers……………………………………
    • Edmond Dantès  •  28 days ago
      Ambulance chasing US lawyer rubbing his greedy little hands together and calculating how much he's going to profit from other people's misery.
    • Anthony  •  Valletta, Malta  •  27 days ago
      It seems to me that people talk about money compensation here. To me this is greed. No one has mentioned anything about the difficulty to evacuate 4000 persons from a sinking ship. Hundreds have died during an evacuation of a stadium. We all know that a stadium is not sinking. The aisles in a stadium are not claustrophobic at all. Evacuating persons in distress is unpredictable. Many of those who take a cruses often ignore the emergency drill.

      A very sensitive point here is that we seem not aware of the fact that different people behave differently under similar circumstance. Possible all sea captains should be vetted before they are given the post of sea captain.

      At times the salvage of persons from the Concordia was like pulling people from a well. I cannot understand how it is possible that horizontal ladders are not part of the security arrangements on any ship including British warships. Horizontal ladders would become vertical ladders when a ship falls on one of its sides. These could have saved a few more.
    • J  •  Bristol, England  •  28 days ago
      Costa cruises will have taken extreme legal advice, waying up the pros and cons!
      Costa cruise's lawyers will have ran the figures, ran the senarios, what could ,what might happen if !!
      Trust me the solicitors, lawyers will not lose out! win or lose they will get their money!!
      I would say, although your experience must have been horrendous and you have full sympathy, if you were not physically hurt, then think what are you actually arguing for you''ll need to prove your hurt, physical and mental, case's like this go on and on (I've been there, I know)
    • wiggins  •  27 days ago
      This will be peanuts compared to the Insurance money the Company will get.
    • Wiseworker  •  London, England  •  28 days ago
      How much are newspapers putting aside to buy survivors stories. Another nice little earner.
    • Lee  •  London, England  •  28 days ago
      All it is, is Greed. Nothing is ever enough for some people. Don't get me wrong, life and traumatic experiences are priceless in that you cannot put a cost on them. But we forget that life and its events we cannot control. Do we get 9 grand every time someone in our family dies of cancer. Do we get 3 grand every time we trip over a step? No. So £9,000 for being unscathed and just suffering from shock and whatever is a pretty fair amount. People who fight for more are just greedy. That's not to say they do or don't deserve it. I'm not making a judgment about what amount is deserved, I'm just saying all it is, is greed. Just like the RBS banker! See the similarity? I rest my case.
    • anon  •  London, England  •  28 days ago
      This is looking more & more like negligence, not an unavoidable accident.. I dont think £9k could even start to help the horror of thinking you are going to drown and seeing people dying. Extremely traumatic for all on board including the crew, and imagine if you had been on there with your children. This is a rare case for decent compensation... I would imagine many of these people will never sail again and have fears about water for the rest of their lives. RIP the dead.
    • stephen  •  Reading, England  •  28 days ago
      Most of them escaped un-harmed with a cracking story to tell. 9k and a full refund is more than fair!!!
    • Iain  •  London, England  •  28 days ago
      For those lucky souls who escaped uninjured I think £9,000 is a fair opening figure (make it £12,000, pay for all lost effects and everybody's happy). For those who were very sadly killed or injured then their relatives must take things further and sue the Company as far as they can. Unfortunately US lawyers have no knowledge of boundaries or reason and will be pushing everybody to be as greedy as possible as usual - parasitical scumbags.
    • David  •  London, England  •  28 days ago
      They are having a laugh !
    • copper  •  28 days ago
      stick it out, its a U.S parent company!
    • Private_Pilot  •  28 days ago
      It's a start. Nothing more. Merely an opening gambit by the company. One or two will take it, but the rest are already planning their class action if they have any sense.
    • shaun g  •  Manchester, England  •  28 days ago
      Looks like the compensation bill is gonna 'costa' fortune! And so it bloomin well should!
    • chin  •  London, England  •  26 days ago
      Good enough compensation, the survivors should be happy to be alive, all else is greed.
    Search
    POLL

    Do young people have an unrealistic attitude to work?

    Loading...
    Poll Choice Options