Developing

Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Costs of Britain's booze binges revealed

    By Oliver Hotham

    Problem drinking is costing the taxpayer £2.7 billion a year, the prime minister will warn later.

    David Cameron is touring the north-east to meet with doctors, nurses, paramedics and police, those on the frontline of Britain's binge drinking problem, to argue stricter rules and a change in public perceptions are necessary to curb the issue of problem drinking.

    On top of the £90 per person bill faced by the NHS, the government has calculated the wider cost of alcohol to Britain as being between £17 billion and £22 billion.

    The prime minister is expected to say it is unacceptable public drunkenness which links to violence and intimidation has become the norm.

    "This is one of the scandals of our society and I am determined to deal with it.

    "As figures today show the NHS is having to pick up an ever-growing bill - £2.7 billion a year, including £1 billion on accident and emergency services alone. That’s money we have to spend because of the reckless behaviour of an irresponsible minority," he will say.

    "This isn't just about more rules and regulation. It's about responsibility and a sense of respect for others. This is an area where the drinks industry, supermarkets, pubs and clubs need to work with government so that responsible drinking becomes a reality and not just a slogan."

    The opposition is arguing the government's policy of cutting frontline police services is making it harder for police to deal with problem drinkers.

    "The fact is, on Friday and Saturday nights across our country, the prime minister's policy of cutting frontline police officers is making it harder, not easier, to tackle problem drinkers," a Labour party spokesperson said.

    Both the government and the opposition have been suggesting the possibility of introducing a minimum price per unit of alcohol, which would limit the consumption of cheap strong drinks like cider or own-brand spirits.

    The Scottish government has been trying to implement a minimum pricing policy since last year and faces a legal battle from the drinks industry if it passes. Scotland has the worst rates of alcohol abuse in the county, drinking a quarter more per head than the rest of the country.

    It has been estimated that a minimum pricing policy might save around 10,000 lives a year.
     

     

    8 comments

    • GOPHAR CORFE  •  3 months ago
      £90 a person, my great great grandad, could buy a shipload for that much
    • Ken  •  Manchester, England  •  3 months ago
      The government takes over £10 billion in tax from drinkers all it is doing is making those on fixed income i.e. pensioners pay more for their drink without being compensated. You would have to treble the price on one can of beer to slow down any youngster from purchasing his fix
    • paul  •  Bang Krang, Thailand  •  2 months ago
      Breathalise them before they enter hospital, and charge accordingly!
    • gopal mistry  •  Maidenhead, England  •  3 months ago
      the cause of of britains problem starts years ago.. first, as country and other pubs started closing and now with local pubs closing it means people have to congregate around central areas , ie town centres.......a recipe for trouble....high prices mean rather than going out several times a week for a quiet drink most young people now save up through the week and go out friday and saturday...when they go mad,......I am an old codger, .I only go out saturday afternoons for a couple .....but town centre pubs are not my scene and my two locals are closed.......Nowadays you can t get a decent social drink in a quiet pub....to make a living pubs have to sell large quantities of booz to pay high cost overheads...and so lots of noise and trouble....
      • david 3 months ago
        HOW DELIGHTFULLY DELUSIONAL . THE PUB SHUT DOWNS STARTED IN FORCE AFTER 07 WHICH BY COINCIDENCE OF COURSE CAME WITH SMOKING BAN AS GOV CLAMED ABOUT 12% OF UK WOMEN AND 14% OF UK MEN SMOKE , LOL .THEY USED TO GET DRUNK IN PUBS THEN TAKE TO STREETS WHICH LIMEY COPS IGNORED UNLESS IT WAS SERIOUS , SERIOUS , LIKE DAMAGING TOFF PROPERTIES AND BUSINESSES . NOW PR CAMMORON , WHO HATES THE INTERNATIONAL IDEA UK IS ANYTHING BUT HARRY POTTER , SHERLOCK HOLMES , THE QUEEN CIVILISED HAS LOOKED AT THE IMAGE FOR TOURISM AND INVESTMENT AND GOV COSTS AND DECIDES ONE OF HIS LEGACIES WILL BE TO STATISTICALLY STOP IT .
      • R 3 months ago
        'a quiet drink' - young people don't know how to have a quiet drink. Brits just drink too much - all ages. Lager louts in Europe are not all young.
    • cru  •  3 months ago
      They should start with the house of commons, they get cheap booze subsidised by the taxpayer.
    • Sue  •  3 months ago
      They should heavily fine anyone found drunk and disorderly, minimum 500 quid! I bet they would think twice about being seen in public like it again!
    • Maurice Sutton  •  Lisbon, Portugal  •  3 months ago
      how many children will have alcohol imposed on them by there parents and put in danger and neglected by this killer drug and other poeple in public places i hold the politcal drug barons accountable for imposing second hand alcohol that put peoples lives in danger in public places and around children and if anyone is harmed by secound hand alcohol prosecute goverment and local authority alcohol proven kills no alcohol in supermarkets father of wayne
    • Aladenas Malik  •  3 months ago
      Best part of £20 billion is a national disgrace.Make em pay for ALL hospital treatment required that was caused by alcohol abuse. Plus a fine of £250 for every treatment to go direct to the NHS.
      • sparkandflame 3 months ago
        If you drink alot of booze in a few hours you get drunk. Its common. It happens. The people that work full time jobs pay Tax and Insurance. The tax and Insurance, insures us decent Policing, and a good NHS service should the tax payer need it, I am no stranger to being drunk on a Sat night, BUT I have paid into the Tax and Insurance system for 20+ years.. Regardless of me being under the influence or not when I become injured -- I would and always will expect treatment without the extra "charges" You are suggesting! Though I do believe that the BUMS and scroungers who flock in groups at the weekend who become drunken violent yobs, should be refused treatment if it isnt life threatened. BUT to plonk extra charges and force to pay is not going to happen.. even the BUMS of this world have to pay TAX and VAT on their booze..