Developing

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    FEATURE-U.S. loves cops and firefighters -but not their pensions

    NEW YORK, July 29 (Reuters) - Pharmacist Michael Nastro is

    full of admiration for how police responded to a deadly robbery

    in his suburban New York neighborhood in 2011.

    A gunman walked into a pharmacy near his own on Long Island,

    killed four people and fled with a stash of painkillers. Police

    in the area, which is part of wealthy Suffolk County, best known

    for the exclusive Hamptons beach towns, boosted patrols and gave

    advice on what to do if the robber hit again. They caught him

    three days after the shooting.

    But Nastro, 50, admits he's torn about police officers' pay

    and retirement benefits. "I'd be lying to you if I said I wasn't

    conflicted," he said. "I want good police work, but I'm a

    taxpayer too. There's got to be a middle ground."

    The average annual pension for Suffolk County cops who have

    retired since 2007 was $86,702, according to figures from the

    Manhattan Institute, a public policy think tank, against $37,270

    for other county employees, excluding teachers. The county,

    facing a three-year deficit of $530 million, declared a fiscal

    emergency in March.

    Traditionally, U.S. voters have backed generous pay and

    benefits for the cops and firefighters willing to risk their

    lives to keep citizens safe. That was especially so after the

    deaths of many emergency workers in the Sept. 11, 2001, attack

    on the World Trade Center in New York.

    But as economic conditions have worsened and many local

    governments have run into severe fiscal problems, that attitude

    has started to change. Since the 2007 recession, some cities

    have tried to roll back pension benefits and pay, among the most

    rigid and, in some cases, highest expenses in municipal budgets.

    From New York to California and points in between, cops and

    firefighters have been drawn into pitched battles over their pay

    and benefits.

    In San Diego and San Jose, California's second and third

    biggest cities, voters in June overwhelmingly backed sweeping

    pension reforms. In San Jose, all employees will have to choose

    between reduced benefits or higher retirement contributions.

    In the mid-sized California cities of Stockton and San

    Bernardino, officials say public safety costs were among the

    factors that forced both to declare bankruptcy. In Vallejo, a

    former U.S. Navy town near San Francisco that emerged from a

    three-year bankruptcy last year, public safety pay and benefits

    were consuming three-quarters of the city's general fund.

    Detroit, plagued with one of the highest crime rates in the

    country, nonetheless cut pay and healthcare benefits for city

    workers, including police, by 10 percent just over a week ago, a

    move the mayor says will save the cash-strapped city $102

    million a year.

    A legal challenge by the Detroit Police Officers Association

    failed, even as union President Joe Duncan publicly complained

    of what the cuts would mean for Detroit's ability to hire

    police, noting that the city is "already 50th on the list of pay

    for the biggest 50 cities in the United States."

    St. Louis this month approved an overhaul of the firefighter

    retirement system that rolls back decades of increases, while

    Miami officials trying to plug a $60 million budget gap this

    week declared "financial urgency," which will let them alter

    employee contracts. Among the city's proposals: limit overtime

    for firefighters and require higher health care contributions.

    According to an analysis by New York-area newspaper Newsday

    published last month, police and sheriff's department employees

    in Nassau and Suffolk counties reached nearly two-thirds of each

    county's payroll.

    "That is why a lot of municipalities are choosing bankruptcy,

    because it's the only way - other than getting a state control

    board - of getting out of these salary and pension

    requirements,'' said the former top official of Suffolk County,

    Steve Levy.

    SAVINGS AND SAFETY

    Striking the right balance between savings and safety is a

    touchy business, though.

    While it's become almost routine for voters to rail against

    fat paychecks and generous benefits for teachers, transit

    workers and other public employees, cops and firefighters have

    in the past been largely spared such anger.

    For example, in Wisconsin, where most public workers were

    stripped of their collective bargaining rights and made to pay

    more to fund their pensions, firefighters, cops and other public

    safety workers were given an exemption.

    Still, Jim Carver, president of the Nassau County Police

    Benevolent Association, says politicians have started to target

    cops and firefighters. The state seized control of Nassau

    County's finances after the county failed to balance its budget

    and had its credit rating cut last year.

    Carver bristles at the notion that police and firefighters

    don't deserve what they earn.

    "After 9/11, you couldn't find a politician that wasn't

    rushing to put his arms around a cop or a firefighter," he said.

    "Ten, 12 years later, we are to blame for everything.

    Politicians have made us the enemy. We didn't put a gun to

    anybody's head. These were fairly negotiated contracts."

    "EVERYBODY'S COMPLICIT"

    To be sure, it took decades of bad decisions and poor

    management by local authorities to put many communities in

    fiscal dire straits. In countless cases, cities, counties and

    states over-promised benefits to retirees but neglected to set

    aside sufficient reserves to cover their liabilities.

    When the economy and stock market were booming, cities often

    sweetened pension benefits, confident the money would be there

    in the end. After 9/11, the cops and firefighters' heroic status

    with the public meant that they were in a particularly strong

    bargaining position.

    But the 2007-2008 recession and the impact of the housing

    bust on real estate taxes hammered municipal revenues and badly

    hurt pension funds' investment returns.

    The Pew Center on the States said the gap between states'

    pension promises and liabilities was $757 billion in 2010.

    "Everybody's complicit in this,'' said Lawrence Levy,

    executive dean of the National Center on Suburban Studies at

    Hofstra University.

    Noel DiGerolamo, head of the Patrolmen's Benevolent

    Association in Suffolk County, has harsh words for the public

    officials, saying they should be bearing the blame for fiscal

    woes.

    "Rather than being responsible leaders of government and

    saying, 'We have these pension obligations that we're going to

    have to pay,' and saving towards those obligations, they are

    being politicians," DiGerolamo said. "And when the bill comes

    due, blaming employees who have worked towards and earned these

    pensions for 20 or 25 years."

    BROKE IN CALIFORNIA

    Of course, scores of municipalities are managing to balance

    their budgets even as costs rise. Only a few of the 90,000

    issuers in the municipal debt market are in true distress.

    Even many with escalating pension costs can meet their

    current obligations. It's keeping up with promises to aging

    citizens who are living longer that keeps officials up at night.

    In some cases, contracts that may once have seemed fair are

    helping to bankrupt cities and leading to severe cuts in

    services, including fire station closures and reductions in

    police forces. Eight municipalities have sought protection from

    their creditors so far this year, following 13 that filed in

    2011, and many others are having to slash their budgets.

    San Bernardino, a city of 210,000 some 65 miles east of Los

    Angeles that has been hit hard by the collapse of the housing

    market, says public safety spending eats up 73 percent of its

    general fund budget, with overtime for firefighters especially

    onerous. Pension costs are expected to reach $25 million this

    year, double the 2006 level.

    The city imposed a temporary 10 percent pay cut, but the

    firefighters' union successfully challenged it in court and is

    entitled to back pay. The city council voted last week to

    suspend debt payments and quit paying into a retiree health

    fund.

    Some 350 miles to the north, Stockton, the biggest U.S. city

    ever to file for bankruptcy, allows police officers to retire at

    50 with pensions based on 3 percent of final pay for each year

    in service.

    When he signed the bankruptcy filing in June, Stockton city

    manager Bob Deis said a 1996 decision to provide firefighters

    with free health care in retirement, later expanded to all city

    employees, was a "Ponzi scheme" that saddled the city with a

    $417 million liability.

    Because their jobs are dangerous and physically taxing, cops

    and firefighters typically retire after 20 or 30 years on the

    job, and that's as it should be, said Michael Coleman, a policy

    adviser for the League of California Cities, an association of

    municipal officials from the state.

    But that's why it's important to keep pensions reasonable.

    "I don't think anyone disagrees that these are dangerous

    jobs. But how much is enough? Unfortunately, I think it's gone

    too far," Coleman said.

    The contrast between benefits in the public and private

    sectors is stark.

    Only 26 percent of U.S. companies offer retiree healthcare

    benefits, compared with 66 percent that did so in 1988,

    according to the Kaiser Family Foundation.

    Most private sector employees bear the brunt of providing

    for their retirement by saving money in funds known as 401(k)

    plans, with companies typically also making contributions.

    After the 2007 recession, some firms stopped making

    contributions altogether.

    It can all add to tensions as some taxpayers question why

    their services are being cut or property taxes raised so a city

    or county can find the money for generous retirement benefits.

    In New York, a 2010 investigation by then-attorney general

    Andrew Cuomo, now governor, found widespread incidence of

    "pension padding" - public employees working extra overtime in

    their last year on the job to boost pay and retirement income.

    That's especially costly when it comes to well-paid public

    safety workers. The Manhattan Institute estimates nearly 10

    percent of New York State cops and firefighters who retired in

    2011 will receive six-figure pensions, from 2 percent in 2001.

    NO QUICK FIXES

    Quick fixes, however, are unlikely.

    Efforts to revamp public pension plans face stiff legal

    challenges. Each state has its own constitution, courts and case

    law that affect how it can go about changing retirement systems.

    Firefighters in San Bernardino have filed seven legal

    actions against attempts to scale back pay and benefits since

    2007.

    In many municipalities, public salaries and pensions are

    pegged to those offered in comparably sized regional cities. In

    New York, pensions, once set by the state, cannot be negotiated

    through collective bargaining.

    At the same time, alternative ways to tackle deficits, such

    as raising taxes, are politically unpopular.

    In the small Southern California city of Stanton, voters

    recently rejected a proposed utility tax hike that would have

    raised $1.1 million. The city instead cut back on active police

    and fire staff, which account for 77 percent of its spending.

    "Will there be some impact on response time? There could

    be," said city manager Carol Jacobs. "But this city is not going

    to go bankrupt."

    In some cases, unions have preferred layoffs to reduced

    retirement benefits. Two troubled cities in New Jersey are cases

    in point. Camden, one of the state's poorest and most

    crime-plagued cities, recently cut its police force by about

    half, and Newark cut its force by a third after unions declined

    concessions demanded by their city governments.

    In New York, former Nassau County Executive Thomas Suozzi, a

    Long Island Democrat who has clashed with police unions, gave a

    stark assessment. "We're facing a problem that will be faced by

    every town in America.

    "You can't raise property taxes anymore - people won't go

    for it. There's no more money. So, do you cut services, which

    will result in the death of the suburbs, I think, or do you make

    these salaries and pensions more rational than they've been?"