Developing

Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Iran Nuclear Crisis: UN Inspectors Fly In

    UN nuclear inspectors have arrived in Iran for more talks with officials about the country's controversial nuclear programme.

    It is the second visit in a month by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), reflecting growing international concerns about alleged weapons experiments.

    Chief inspector Herman Nackaerts said his "highest priority" was to clarify the "possible military dimensions" of the nuclear programme, although he warned it "may take a while".

    Iran insists its uranium enrichment work is peaceful and will be used primarily to generate electricity.

    However, Western nations believe the programme is geared towards making weapons and is a major threat to the stability of the region.

    Tensions have risen over speculation that Israel may carry out a military strike on Iran's nuclear facilities.

    US National Security Adviser Tom Donilon has flown to Israel for discussions with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and other senior officials.

    But the head of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey, said on Sunday it was still unclear whether Iran had the ability to make a nuclear bomb.

    "On that basis, I think it would be premature to exclusively decide that the time for a military option was upon us," he said.

    Foreign Secretary William Hague has warned Israel that military action against Iran would not be "a wise thing".

    He said economic sanctions and negotiations had to be given "a real chance" to convince Tehran to abandon its nuclear ambitions.

    In a television interview Mr Hague also repeated his warning that if Iran built nuclear weapons it could result in another Cold War - this time in the Middle East.

    "They would either be attacked and there would be a war, or there would be a cold war in which Iran would be subject to these very intense economic sanctions and they would find that other nations in their region developed nuclear weapons," he said.

    Last week Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad took part in an elaborate ceremony to show how much progress had been made with the country's nuclear programme.

    Tehran said it had used domestically-made nuclear fuel in a reactor for the first time, as well as developing faster, more efficient uranium enrichment centrifuges.

    State TV showed Mr Ahmadinejad inspecting the fuel rods as they were loaded into a reactor.

    The US and the EU have tightened sanctions against Iran after the IAEA said last November it may have carried out tests "relevant to the development of a nuclear explosive device".

    Iran said on Sunday it had halted oil sales to British and French companies, ahead of a European Union oil embargo set to begin on July 1.

    The price of crude rose to an eight-month high following the announcement.

    Iran has since threatened to extend the oil ban to other EU countries.

     

    41 comments

    • gti  •  Birmingham, England  •  3 months ago
      to build a bomb to protect you country from invaders just like the other countries have..whats the big deal? or is it because israel, usa and every other uptight country will no longer be able to attact them.
      • David 3 months ago
        Gti, it's been explained so often now I can only assume you don't vivst this forum very often.

        The big deal is that previously people with nukes were politicians in it for their country, career and to feather their own nests! They might bluster and make threats, but when it came down to the wire, they would not risk a nuclear strike because of the costs involved.

        With "Alhavemadinnajacket" and the mullahs in Iran, it's a totally different situation; they are only interested in furthering the cause of islam. They believe that if they can cause a global war it will usher the arrival of the mahdi, the redeemer of islam. Now it's true that after the heinous crimes and murders commited in its name, islam could do with a bit of redeeming, but the cost according to islamic prophesies is 1/3 of the world's population to die in the conflict, and another 1/3 to die of disease.

        Whether you or I believe in this nonsense or not is not the issue. That hardline islamists do is what matters. This is their goal and the Iranian mullahs and their mouthpiece president do, and that's what they would want to try to initiate.

        Now you know why Iran with the bomb would be so dangerous.
      • Zac 2 months ago
        Actually David, it has been explained so often that we can only assume you don't visit this forum often. Israel and the controlling elite in the West are setting the Middle East up for major nuclear war. It has been foretold and revealed to us by many messengers who have been called theorists, nutters etc. but the fact remains that it is ISRAEL that is the warmongerer and its cabal of very wealthy sponsoring banks. If you had followed the unfolding of what has been prescribed under the N W O you would see that it is exactly on schedule. You have twisted the truth to fit in with Islamic intentions on world domination. Both sides are playing the game, just as Russia did with the West in the Cold War. However, this time Russia and China will be on the side of Iran. It is time for no more lies or truth-twisting. People are seeing right through it now.
    • fadwa g  •  Ilford, England  •  3 months ago
      here we go again, send in the inspectors, STEP 1, Pull out the inspectors before they complete their inspection STEP 2 , Pretend to have official talks STEP 3, time to invade and say the president needs removing STEP 4, and lets not forget lie to the world STEP 5, Welcome to yet another illegal invasion and a war that will possibly have disaster for all.
      • Michael 3 months ago
        You are a Muslim from Ilford. Islam is one crazy backward Sect! Do you think you may possibly be biased??
      • gti 3 months ago
        michael ur on the wrong page u need to type in BMP.
      • Keen Key 3 months ago
        Well said Fadwa.
    • Pistolshooter  •  Edinburgh, Scotland  •  3 months ago
      Leave the Iranians alone. If they want nuclear weapons fine but they cannot be under any illusion that every other nuclear armed country will have selected the targets for reprisal. MAD (mutually assured destruction).
      Should the Iranians "have a go" at Israel I'm afraid that the supply of virgins will not meet the demand!
      • David 3 months ago
        And what makes you think the rest of the world will lift a finger to help the Israelis? If history shows us anything, it's that when push come to shove, the Jews will be left to their fate.

        So far the actions of the world in attempting to stop the Iranians building the bomb is weak and pathetic. When the USSR intended stationing nuclear missiles in Cuba, the US told them straight if they did they would be nuked. If the Israelis even thought of issuing such an ultimatum to the crackpots in Iran, Obama would be one of the first to condemn them.
    • Peter Waine  •  Sheffield, England  •  3 months ago
      What about Israels NUKES? no one ever talks about their nukes have you noticed? And if the Iranians are making nukes then get Iran to scrap them if Isreal does after all if the Israelis are saying they need it for a detterant then it aint working is it? cant be working if Iran are making bomb's despite Israel having them...think about it.
      • Michael 3 months ago
        You are right, I am thinking about it. Israel should launch their nukes on the Muslims and get rid of those backward people once and for all. Unfortunately, since they are a democracy and not authoritarian like the Nazi Muslims, they will not do it.
      • STEVEN 3 months ago
        there's even reliable evidence including from either present or former cia members, that iran doesn't have nuclear weapons intentions and also that the so called mad mullahs are in effect quite the contrary - the whole farcical situation is based on western geopolitical aspirations to dominate and control the middle east
      • Kann 3 months ago
        Michael ! Why don't you go in middle east fight to Muslim your self? Idiot ...
    • Rasain  •  London, England  •  3 months ago
      France supplied Israel with the nuclear power during the Suez crisi and still Israel refusing to sign non-profileration treaty and the west is mouth dump! why is that?
      • John 3 months ago
        And France also supplied Argentina with Exocet Missiles all during the Falklands war……………….
      • beaubum1 3 months ago
        That's right John, they also showed the Argies how to over-come our defences, from their knowledge of NATO war games, so we had to put copter pilots far out to divert the incoming, one of whome was Prince Andrew
    • STEVEN  •  Bath, England  •  3 months ago
      Which nation has refused to sign up to the IAEA, has undeclared nuclear and biochemical weapons, has bombed civilian infrastructures in gaza and lebanon, murdering 1000s of innocent civilians, jails and murders children, assassinates legitimate scientists in other countries, has confined 2 million civilians to concentration camp living conditions for years in gaza. Everyone is barking up the wrong tree - any intelligent, informed person realises that the sanctions should be directed not at iran but at israel, the majority of whose population of the last 60 years don't even belong in the middle east; you'll find they are from the USA, Russia and the rest of europe
    • cali  •  Maidenhead, England  •  3 months ago
      Whilst I understand the concerns, I think that Israel who DOES have nuclear capacity should not threaten because others maybe desire to keep their options open, this will almost certainly make sure that Iran will proceed.
    • tim  •  3 months ago
      Forget about IRAN just complete a detailed itinery of nuclear weapons held by ISRAEL.
    • charlize  •  3 months ago
      Slightly off subject I know but did you see that India is approaching Iran to buy oil now that other countries are imposing trade sanctions. And we send these guys aid money - supposedly to improve diplomatic relations and keep them onside. This is a joke, these countries just take the money and run and have about as much loyalty as a gnat.
    • A Yahoo! user  •  3 months ago
      several ministers in UK and USA are jews. It is in their interest that Iran is attacked. UK is going to have a jew prime minister very soon.
    • Madge  •  Zurich, Switzerland  •  3 months ago
      How come Sean Penn is not there with them - to claim Israel for Iran? Is he sick?
    • Sam  •  London, England  •  3 months ago
      I think its more worrying that Pakistan has Nukes. That country is far more unstable than Israel or Iran.
    • biko  •  Telford, England  •  3 months ago
      Why Iran? all this to take our mind out of broken economy
    • Space Cadet  •  3 months ago
      It is comical that Europe and the UK are stating that they have created a sanction against IRAN. Because the reality of the economics is that Iran has just called their bluff and pulled the rug from under their feet by suspending oil supplies immediately. Why? Because if you recall back to the last high in oil prices, it was in 2008, the economic crash. What caused the crash, mostly housing crash but what pushed most countries over the edge and affected the every day person was the soaring price of oil.

      What Iran has done is turned the table and basically decided to send the price of oil sky high again. What will that do? European companies will now have to buy from OPEC cartels, who in turn with speculators will send the price of oil to the predicted all time highs of up to 200€ a barrel. Iran will be blamed but they won't care because they have nothing to lose in sabotaging the western economy.

      What will this cause? As predicted also, tour operators will go bust, transport companies will have to hike their transport of food and merchandise costs, fuel pump prices will rocket, food prices will rise at unforeseen rates (buy seasonal local produce if I were you), and public transport costs will rise yet again.

      Effectively, IRAN and they supposed smart move of the west (which has and will backfire economically) have created a recession which will be much harder to get out of than the last.

      Will Iran suffer? Unfortunately not! They have sufficient support and bigger clients in the East to take up the slack. They can also subsidies their fuel to Iranians and Iranian friendly states to protect them from the oil crisis until the anti west states feel the West is sufficiently weakened.

      Who will benefit the most? China mostly. They have the most disposable cash to bail out and buy out infrastructures in the west. They will be able to do this while continuing to strengthen their military. Russia will see it as an opportunity to start taking over the roles of 'policing states' so it can send in 'peacekeeping' forces to arab regions which will actually be there to protect their local interests and stop the west getting their hands on resources they wish to control.

      How long will this take? Initial stages will be 3-6 months for price hikes and financial pain to your every day member of the public. Surge in unemployment figures in about 6 months. Return to official recession, no more than 9 months, but unofficially you are already in one. Massive public disorder, 9 - 12 months max!

      This is not scaremongering, it is economics and politics at work.
    • Woody  •  Bedford, England  •  3 months ago
      I just hope *everyone* involved - keeps their heads on this one and finds a rational solution - otherwise it's us, the everyday people who will suffer for their pride and arrogance.
    • Lee  •  Sheffield, England  •  3 months ago
      Isn't this all just a poor excuse for the US and UN to invade Iran by scaremongering us all? Israel has nuclear capabilities, so does Britain and many countries. one day we are all going to have to rely on nuclear power for our energy source. Don't forget which country is the only one to drop a nuclear bomb in the name of peace – the USA! Let's have the truth.
    • Robert  •  3 months ago
      The UN should be flying in to Argentina and tell them to keep their noses out and they are being watched!
    • Dean Ally  •  Birmingham, England  •  3 months ago
      The illegal state of israel that has breached UN resolutions on countless occasions and violated the palastinian people on a daily bassis is the real threat to world peace. It has nuclear weapons and orders the usa to do what is in israels interest.
    • EX2RGJ  •  St Albans, England  •  3 months ago
      Here we go again, whats the point of this; Hans Blix went into Iraq, found absolutely NOTHING, then BLIAR and BUSH still invaded IRAQ. Murdering pigs. A few years ago Vannunn whom is an israeli actually discovered the Israelis were building Nuclear weapons, that was kept under wraps wasnt it, just typical, the UK and properganda go hand in hand.
    • Stiff Lower Lip  •  3 months ago
      I hope they stick to knocking off each others' scientists and diplomats off and leave us plebs out of it