Developing

Yahoo!. Now with Friends.

Discover news, videos and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    RBS Boss Caves In And Waives £1m Bonus

    The Royal Bank of Scotland has announced that its chief executive Stephen Hester has decided to waive his £1m bonus.

    It comes just hours after the Labour Party said it would force a House of Commons vote calling for Mr Hester to be stripped of his shares-only payment .

    Mr Hester had been facing mounting pressure to follow the bank's chairman, Sir Philip Hampton , and forego the award.

    Although the move has been welcomed by politicians across the board, a spokeswoman for the Prime Minister said it was a "matter for individuals" whether to accept bonuses.

    Sky News City editor Mark Kleinman said: "My understanding in is that Mr Hester is abroad on holiday at the moment and only made the decision on Sunday night.

    " RBS shares are now languishing so much that British taxpayers risk a loss of £10bn on their investment."

    The bank has lost nearly 45% of its value in the last 12 months.

    Kleinman added: " Stephen Hester has decided, after days of mounting criticism about his million-pound bonus award, to relinquish that bonus.

    "He has decided to waive it and he will not accept the 3.6 million shares that he was granted by the board of directors.

    "He has been saying to friends over the last few days that he does not see any reason why he should give up that bonus, but I think the political pressure on him has become intolerable.

    "The Labour Party called for a vote in the Commons on the issue and Mr Hester is said by friends of his to be deeply concerned by the fact that he is becoming a pariah of the banking sector, despite the fact that he was parachuted in to help turn RBS around after it was bailed out by British taxpayers in 2008.

    "This is clearly an attempt by him to prevent the escalating row from distracting him from the job of running RBS, which is one of the biggest corporate turnarounds in the history of the banking sector."

    Shadow business secretary Chuka Umunna, who criticised the payment, said Mr Hester was finally responding to public sentiment.

    He told Sky News: "He is responding to public concern and criticism about the level of remuneration in the bank, in particular in relation to his position.

    "For somebody to listen and respond, we of course would not criticise that."

    He added: "Of course, the financial sector should be able to operate properly but it needs to command the confidence of the British people."

    Sky News chief political correspondent Jon Craig said Mr Hester came under pressure from the Government and that Prime Minister David Cameron would be "relieved".

    "He will be relieved because he had been made to look rather foolish and he has been criticised by the Labour Party and by some of the Lib Dems for not doing more to prevent this happening," he said.

    RBS required a £45.5bn rescue package in 2008 after business errors and light financial regulation led to its near-collapse under the leadership of Sir Fred Goodwin .

    RBS is now 82% owned by the Government and thus under extra scrutiny when it comes to banker remuneration.

    Labour leader Ed Miliband said foregoing the bonus was "the right thing" for Mr Hester to do.

    Mr Miliband said: "It is a shame that a feeble, out of touch David Cameron did not realise he should do the right thing and stand up for the interests of the British people.

    "Labour was right to seek a parliamentary vote on this so that the people's voice could be heard. But the debate about fair executive pay and responsible capitalism is only just beginning.

    "We need a Government that will tax bankers' bonuses and bring responsibility to the boardroom."

    Chancellor George Osborne also called the decision "sensible".

    He now hoped Mr Hester could "focus on the very important job he has got to do, namely to get back billions of pounds of taxpayers' money that was put into RBS".

    But Albert Ellis from the City recruitment firm Harvey Nash Group told Sky News that the majority of those in the Square Mile think Mr Hester has done a good job at RBS.

    "So I think he will not be short of offers (if he decided to leave) in a world that is highly competitive, where good banking management actually is still quite scarce," he added. 

    Taxpayers' Alliance spokesman Matthew Sinclair said both Labour and the current Government had let down the British public over successive years with RBS.

    He told Sky News: "The Government needs to ensure the company is being run in the interest of the taxpayer and not its staff."

    Scotland's First Minister Alex Salmond said: "This is a welcome development but it should never have come to this stage as these circumstances cannot be left to individual decisions. They must be a matter of public policy."

     
    • Mike B  •  Poole, England  •  27 days ago
      Why did Labour let Fred Goodwin off the hook yet now they are trying to tell the Government they are doing it all wrong for a minnow compared to Fred
    • whocareswhatyouthink.  •  27 days ago
      Never mind RBS what about the councillors taking great big pay packets.
    • DAVID  •  London, England  •  27 days ago
      How about Labour forcing a judicial review of government ministers and officials over the past 10 or so years?,
    • I  •  London, England  •  27 days ago
      How about labour forcing a vote to get Jacqui Smith to pay back the £150 grand she fiddled by claiming her sisters spare bedroom was her main residence,when she was entitled as home secretary to free grace and favour accomodation.
    • Harry  •  Brighton, England  •  27 days ago
      Labour party, what a joke they are, led by a clown. They agreed the deal, now as usual they want to change the rules. What we need is a new party that is accountable to the people. We could then get rid of these forked tongued Richards.
    • David  •  Birmingham, England  •  27 days ago
      heres a good idea - lets try and set the precedence that a company can change your contract and pay you less even when you have done everything asked of you - nice one Labour so much for looking after the working classes
    • Andy  •  Manchester, England  •  27 days ago
      Why do labour pretend to care about bank bonuses?
      In reality they would do NOTHING if they were in office.
      Conservatives/Labour/Liberals : they all work/would work for the same elite money interests.
      If you REALLY want change you must vote for someone OTHER THAN the mainstream parties.
    • Stephen  •  27 days ago
      I'm no tory supporter! but what a shame Labour couldn't find the nuts the force a vote on a EU referendum
    • N Pee  •  27 days ago
      Labour ought to take a look at its own members ie, Blair, Brown and Miliband the elder, before spouting off. They are all earning more than Hester, and are doing F all for the country.
    • denise  •  Manchester, England  •  27 days ago
      If I were a Labour MP reading this I would die of shame. Your sins are too fresh in the memory of this country for you to be credibly asking for this to happen. You made it possible, you are to blame. The utter hypocrisy of this stance is sickening. We, the people, are not stupid.
    • Ireland's Eye  •  London, England  •  27 days ago
      Labour were the wasters of British working peoples' taxes. They gave Sir Fred Goodwin a knighthood in 2004, then a pension of £670,000 when he destroyed the RBS, the little #$%$
    • Extragalactic Megabeing  •  Ware, England  •  27 days ago
      Can someone remind me which government it was that agreed Stephen Hester's contract - Mr Hester was appointed as the Royal Bank of Scotland's chief executive at the end of 2008 to replace Sir Fred Goodwin, after the bank had to be bailed out by the government, which owns 82% of the bank.
    • A G  •  27 days ago
      what a farce, Labour cosied up to Goodwin etc.. totally messed up the banks ,allowed uncontrolled lending & completely ruined the economy they inherited in 1997...(people forget that the tories sorted out the economy by 1997 but became unpopular because of it)...and now they bleat about Hester...pathetic , but then again Milli-bean is barely old enough to remember 1997....
    • douglas  •  Hull, England  •  27 days ago
      The lynch mobs are going for the wrong targets.

      It was the prenationalization directors that were responsible for the taxpayer having to pick up the tab. Stripping their knighthood is a mere geegaw - they should have forfeited their property and pensions - but they probably had too many political cronies for that to happen.
    • bob b  •  London, England  •  27 days ago
      If the guy had a contract then surely it can't be broken unless he didn't meet the bonus criteria! Employment law applies to us all, top and bottom of the pay scale.
      The wrong thing is that a bonus was written into the contract in the first place (read labour) - about time bonus were got rid of in these high paid jobs. The reward is the salary if you don't meet targets you are fired - Simple!
    • troy  •  Manchester, England  •  27 days ago
      excuse my i might be wrong but wasnt it labour who agreed to this guy,s wages and bonuses
    • ivan h  •  Singapore, Singapore  •  27 days ago
      A labour source said the lack of the present leadership ,well they should know about lack of leadership
    • R. Suppards  •  Manchester, England  •  27 days ago
      Remind me who was the clown who set up the deal, not Gord by any chance was it?
    • Robbie, Manchester  •  27 days ago
      Its apity they didnt think of his bonus at the time he was appointed, who were in charge at the time ? er....Labour.
    • Ayrshire tropical paradis ...  •  Edinburgh, Scotland  •  27 days ago
      Right: that does it. I've resisted the urge for over a decade, but now I'm going to set up a political party to sort this wage / bonuses / perks problem once and for all:

      - Ban all bonuses. If you do a good job, you keep it and get paid. If you don't, you get sacked. Case closed.
      - Nobody in an organisation gets paid more than 10 times the wage of the lowest worker in a financial year.
      - Nobody in the public sector gets paid more than £40k a year. Public sector pay is based on stupid economics anyway: taxes pay for public sector workers, so why are they taxed and paid huge salaries? Pay public sector workers a small wage, but don't tax them.
      - Restore the exponential rate of tax on income. So if someone earns £50k a year (private sector), tax him/her by 40%. If someone earns £1 million a year, tax him/her by 80%.
      - If the super-rich don't like this, they can buzz off abroad. The UK govt requisitions their businesses and sells it to other companies. And the greedy directors will not be allowed to move back to the UK.