Developing

Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Labour Calls For Banks To Cut Bonuses

    Labour has called for all British banks to cut bonuses after public pressure led Royal Bank of Scotland chief executive Stephen Hester to waive his near £1m payout.

    The party says bumper City payments are damaging the economy and wider society.

    It used an opposition day debate to insist bosses of banks shored up by the taxpayer should only get bonuses for "genuinely exceptional performance".

    Labour also wants employee representatives to be on remuneration committees of company boards as an extra safeguard against excessive rewards.

    In reply, Chancellor George Osborne warned the row over bonuses and pay threatens to undermine the jobs and prosperity provided by the free market economy.

    In a speech to business leaders he also suggested Labour was "anti-business" - a claim rejected by shadow business secretary Chuka Umunna.

    Mr Umunna told MPs it was not fair so many people were suffering an "extraordinary squeeze" on their living standards while those who had caused the problem continued to enjoy "very high remuneration".

    Mr Umunna went on: "The public rightly expects the culture of excessive bonuses must stop.

    "That means bank executives' remunerations stated to be 'performance-related' should be just that - related to performance.

    "Very large bonuses should only be paid to reflect genuine exceptional performance if trust in the system is to be maintained." 

    Earlier the City's bonus culture was defended by the chief of oil giant BP which has just announced fourth quarter profits of just under £5bn.

    Bob Dudley told Sky News' Jeff Randall London must offer competitive pay if it is to remain a global business centre.

    He confirmed BP would pay bonuses this year but declined to say how much they will be worth.

    Labour's motion - which was defeated - came as the Lloyds Banking Group confirmed almost 1,000 jobs are to be axed and three offices closed.

    The original aim of the motion was to force a vote on RBS boss Stephen Hester's proposed shares bonus for last year - until he decided to forego it.

    The debate came as Mr Hester broke his silence on the issue. In a letter to the largely state-owned bank's staff, he said press coverage had been "discomforting to say the least".

    But he insisted RBS was "making progress in the face of a difficult inheritance". The best way to deal with criticism was to "prove the critics wrong", he added.

    All of the three main parties are vying to be seen as taking the lead in establishing what has been dubbed "responsible capitalism" in the wake of the credit crunch.

    Labour believes it has captured the public mood amid popular anger at the perceived excesses of the City at a time of economic austerity.

    But the party has also faced criticism that it is stoking anti-business sentiment which risks driving banks and other financial institutions overseas.

    On Tuesday the boss of Network Rail said he will pass up on his annual bonus after a new row erupted over whether the Government could veto the payout.

    Chief executive Sir David Higgins said he would put the money towards improving safety instead.

    Transport Secretary Justine Greening had planned to attend the company's annual general meeting on Friday to vote against reported plans to hand Sir David a £340,000 bonus.

     

    45 comments

    • mick  •  3 months ago
      Number one rule.....keep saying whatever is popular with the public, so that you build a history in their minds of speaking out and being seen doing the right thing. Next , once the election is over, forget all about whatever you promised. Its called British Politics.
    • Steve  •  Sunderland, England  •  3 months ago
      Can I please have a bonus equal to my salary just for having the endurance to stick my job for another year? Sorry,what? That's only reserved for those on the gravy train? OK then.
    • Neil McGowan  •  Moscow, Russia  •  3 months ago
      But it was Labour who gave Fred the Shred his peerage, wasn't it?
      • Bigman 3 months ago
        Knighthood but the point is well made.
      • AJF 3 months ago
        and what about the crooks the Tories have given peerages to??
      • DILLIGAF 3 months ago
        gave,or sold?
    • john  •  Manchester, England  •  3 months ago
      one more point -if they pssied off to china and this happened again there.....what would happen to them? of course their not going to go there! and america does not need them and germany looks set to not tolerate this any longer. CALL THEIR BLUFF
    • Keith  •  3 months ago
      anything for votes eh? Labour pricks!!!!!!
      • union and proud 3 months ago
        Could be something to do with we are all in this together , Tory pricks !!!
    • Freddie Jenkins  •  London, England  •  3 months ago
      Blair = multi Millionaire
      Brown = Millionaire
      Kinnock = riding the Euro gravy train with several family members invited on board to share the easy money.
      Mandelson = words fail me...

      Labour = hypocrites.

      At least the tories make no secret of it
      • CU812 3 months ago
        So the Tories have NO millionaires is that what you are saying..... All MPs have lots of money i don't care what party they belong to. Is David Cameron a millionaire the answer is yes.... Tories Hypocrites they take as mush or more than any party....And no i don't care for any of the Big Three parties.
      • Shrooms 3 months ago
        Freddie Jenkins = Snivelling brown nosing Tory snotnose.
      • DAVID 3 months ago
        how do you know about it if labour are keeping it a secret, and if it's not secret then it's ok
    • Tim  •  Manchester, England  •  3 months ago
      This was all going on under Blair/Browns nose but they did nothing about it.Blair earned £12m last year and paid £300,000 tax!
    • Pete  •  Madrid, Spain  •  3 months ago
      What is competitive pay and which other countries apart from the US and Britain have such an undemocratic bonus culture unrelated to performance? Excessive earnings and umerited bonuses are beginning to come down in both Europe and the US as Governments face a backlash from the majority facing austerity measures. It is astonishing that bosses like Bob Dudley of BP which makes money solely because of petrol price hikes and is facing massive law suits for the damage it has caused, can claim to be responsible for the company's increase in profits. Governments should impose a windfall tax on the mining, energy and utility companies.
    • charles  •  Edinburgh, Scotland  •  3 months ago
      Not one of these millionaire FTSE directors really earns their money. They are nothing less than thieves, stealing a bigger share of the pie, at the expense of shareholders and employees and in so doing they usually reduce customer service to a joke. They are truly immoral and despicable - financial buccaneers and pirates. The culture of corporate theft is yet another disease which has spread from USA.
    • Gheng  •  3 months ago
      First they need admit they caused the bonus culture
      • Kevin 3 months ago
        NO they did NOT! Remember the "Yuppie" at all? This bonus culture has been going on since the Thatcher period!
      • mick 3 months ago
        Rule number 2 .....deny everything. Admit nothing.
      • Alan 3 months ago
        @Kevin Yes you are right.

        But then the top pay was NOT 60+ times what the lowest paid were getting and the bonus was NOT 200 or 300% of their pay.

        This vast increase occurred between 1997 and 2009 when Liebore were in power and they did NOTHING to stop it.
    • Robert C  •  Galashiels, Scotland  •  3 months ago
      When folk get paid so much, nothing else matters to them.
      The more they get, the less they care about anything else.
    • Sarah Simpson  •  London, England  •  3 months ago
      We need a new way of doing politics.

      Anyone here seen the 'Changing Britain Vision Part 1' on youtube?
    • K ELLIOT  •  Milton Keynes, England  •  3 months ago
      A million pound bonus for Hester is nothing. I do not here labour screaming and shouting about Fabios "24 MILLION POUND WAGE PACKET FOR FOUR YEARS PART TIME WORK" looking after the England team. He only meets them when they get togetther for a match. ' He does not train them, their own clubs do that
    • realist  •  Manchester, England  •  3 months ago
      its a pity the labour party didn't say this when they signed up the new board of rbs, and signed the contracts that included the bonuses...as for hester he wasn't even working for rbs at the time of the collapse labour brought him in to get in back in profit.
    • Richard  •  Chesham, England  •  3 months ago
      There are over 400 foreign banks operating in the City/Canary Wharf. That is great for our country in or out of Europe. Critics are telling us that the bonuses of these overseas companies should be controlled. What total tosh. Oh, if we cannot do that, then we should just restrict British banks eg Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation. An even better move! Get real everyone.
    • PETER  •  London, England  •  3 months ago
      All of this nonsense about paying to attract the best people.These "best people" have bankrupted the country and the world..id hate to see the worst people.
    • M  •  3 months ago
      Not surprising given that, like the financial institutions, the oil industry always manages to post massive profits each year regardless of how the country is doing as a whole. Money comes so easy in these sectors.
    • rob p  •  Epsom, England  •  3 months ago
      Well, let's see if the politicians and political parties, who have in the past, supporting the bankers, city officials, etc with their massive unreasonable, payouts/bonuses, will succeed in bringing some rational to such bonuses, re it's percentage to clear net profits earned by the institution. Nevertheless, though profit earned, the bonus percentage should be of reasonable percentage, not as exorbitant as we've seen in the recent past. An institution in debt, failing to produce can't be paying bonuses to it's officials on the basis tht it is written in the employment contract. Wht sort of employment/ labour laws do we have tht allows such flaws. Why would someone work hard to, if he/she knows tht whtever the results , I would end up getting a payout. If they succeed in getting one payout, it could well amount a payment for life for him/her n family. The rest will be just peanuts to spend on luxuries and arrogance. We r millions working hard in this country n why should the private sector have a law for themselves. Not only bonuses, wht abt their perks? Socalled business Lunch/dinner/ 5* hotels on their travel trips, 1st class travel fares, Sometimes even mistresses enjoy these perks, chauffeur driven limousines tec. Wht abt politicians with their travel, lodging expenses, lavish dinner/ lunch parties, on course in the name of hard working/negotiations. G7 meeting in Cannes etc, n in return, these fat cats politicians are demanding their population to squeeze, squeeze their backsides for more tax payouts??
    • Peacok  •  3 months ago
      The idea that companies or " talented " big bosses will all flee if they are attacked or taxed is really puzzling and the idea that no one else could possibly do their job is utter nonsense.
      There must be 100's of thousands or more of trained economists in the world that would give their right arm to earn a fraction of what the current lot earn so surely there is really an over saturated market of very talented and bright economists that could very easily fill these positions and do a better job into the bargain.

      That being the case, then in the real world of a market based economy that capitalism claims to be, an over saturated market of talented economists would surely lower salaries because of the competition and not raise them ?
      And wasn't it the current lot of " talented " central banking bosses who were saying almost laughable things like " there will be no more boom and bust ?"
      Alan Greenspan, the most powerful central banker in the world at the time of the Basel meetings before the crash basically told the other world bankers to carry on as they were doing and that regulation wasn't needed and the housing bubble was nothing to worry about and so on and so on.

      These people have just become professional liars over the decades since the financial institutions and oil companies were de-nationalised as they are now accountable to no one.

      What I find as a good rule of thumb is to treat everything they say as the complete opposite of the truth.
    • DILLIGAF  •  London, England  •  3 months ago
      surely everyone working for a shareholder owner business is an employee of those shareholders.
      namely ......us!

      Kleptocracy at work!