Developing

Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    In original Internet shows, hints of coming change

    NEW YORK (AP) — After years of experimenting, the top video destinations on the Web are suddenly flush with original programming: documentaries, reality shows and scripted series.

    Over the next few months, YouTube, Netflix and Hulu will roll out their most ambitious original programming yet — a digital push into a traditional television business that has money, a bevy of stars and a bold attitude of reinvention.

    The long-predicted collision between Internet video and broadcast television is finally under way.

    No one is suggesting that the quality on the Internet is close to that of broadcast TV, but it's becoming easy to imagine a day when it will be.

    And even though critics question whether new media can rival a business that's been around for about 70 years, the video sites have sought partnerships with seasoned professionals. And they benefit from the different economics of global Web-based entertainment.

    Either way, what's happening now is just the first wave.

    "This convergence is now," says documentary filmmaker Morgan Spurlock, who created "The Failure Club," a series about people trying to do the things they've always feared, for Yahoo, and "A Day in the Life," a series documenting 24 hours of someone's life, for Hulu.

    He says the quality still varies, but viewers will soon see talent and production values begin to change.

    On Feb. 6, Netflix will premiere its first scripted show, "Lilyhammer," in which Steve Van Zandt ("The Sopranos") plays a New York mobster in witness protection in Norway. Later this year, it will release "House of Cards," a highly anticipated adaptation of the British miniseries produced by David Fincher and starring Kevin Spacey. Next year, it will debut new episodes of the cultish comedy "Arrested Development," which originally aired on Fox.

    Hulu plans a Feb. 14 premiere for "Battleground," a mock political documentary. The site will later release "Up to Speed," a six-part documentary by Richard Linklater about "monumentally ignored monuments of American cities."

    Hulu, which has some 30 million monthly users and 1.5 million for its monthly subscription service Hulu Plus, is co-owned by the parent companies of NBC, Fox and ABC.

    Yahoo has sought to capitalize on its enormous search audience of nearly 180 million unique monthly visitors by drawing viewers to its original programming, including a slate of women-focused shows launched last fall and comedy programming planned for February. Its first scripted entry will be "Electric City," a futuristic animated series produced by Tom Hanks, who will also voice a character.

    YouTube recently launched an entire catalog of original programming, spending $100 million on the gradual rollout of more than 100 niche-oriented channels.

    The channels don't have the pressures of a 24-hour schedule and instead focus on short-form, on-demand programming. Partners vary from the Wall Street Journal to World Wrestling Entertainment to Madonna.

    At the recent consumer electronics trade show CES, YouTube's global head of content predicted that by 2020 about 75 percent of channels will be transmitted by the Internet. And video will soon be 90 percent of all traffic.

    "Over time, you will see more and more television properties, television channels distributed over the Internet," Robert Kyncl said. "Everything in its due time."

    Internet delivery allows programming that is "much harder to fulfill through traditional distribution means...because we have a global scale," Kyncl added.

    And online systems can serve niche audiences that would be difficult to sustain any other way, and do so at lower cost.

    YouTube plans to expand to hundreds of Internet channels, just as television went from a few networks to dozens of cable channels. In the next few years, "most of your interests will have channels on YouTube," Kyncl predicts.

    Netflix, which streamed 2 billion hours of video in the fourth quarter of 2011, is already operating under the assumption that video networks — whether streaming or televised — are converging. Just as Web video is undertaking original programming, TV networks are experimenting with systems such as TV Everywhere, which allows viewers to watch channels on the Web and on mobile devices.

    "You can think of us as a cable-TV network, but we like to think we are at the center," says Reed Hastings, CEO of Netflix. "We are an Internet TV network, and then they are going to become like us. But it's the same thing, really."

    Hastings offers a comparison between Netflix and HBO: "We are becoming more like them in doing some originals, starting that journey, and they are becoming more like us in creating an on-demand interface like HBO Go," which allows viewers to watch channels on the Web and on mobile and tabulate devices.

    HBO declined to comment.

    Production schedules will vary widely at the sites, but Netflix plans one notable difference: All its episodes will be released at once.

    James McQuivey, an analyst at Forrester Research, says the fact that Hanks is making a series for the Internet shows how the traditional TV system is "ready to unravel.

    McQuivey says the disruption in video will "unfold in front of us like a slow-mo replay of an accident."

    "The new content won't be as good as what you watch Thursday nights from 9 to 10 p.m., but it's going to get closer to that quality," he adds. "And it's certainly as good as what you watch on Thursday from 3 to 4 in the afternoon or Saturday morning from 10 to 11."

    Hulu and Netflix both want to use original content to entice viewers to their much larger libraries of older content. For Netflix, that's movies and old TV; for Hulu, that's last night's TV and older series. Hulu executives say any new original series has to be match up to traditional content.

    "If you're ever going to do anything original, it's got to stand up to that," says Andy Forssell, senior vice president of content at Hulu. "That can't be 'Web video,' it's got to be TV quality."

    Original content remains a small percentage of the budget for Hulu, which plans to spend $500 million on content in 2012.

    Erin McPherson, head of original programming at Yahoo, likes to call Yahoo "the fifth network." Its Yahoo Studios production house in Los Angeles produces as many as 30 originals a month, often partnering with production companies such as Reveille (NBC's "The Office"). Its original programming attracted more than 26 million unique visitors in November, according to comScore.

    "The time is right," says McPherson. "We're finally here."

    ___

    AP Technology Writer Michael Liedtke in San Francisco contributed to this report

     

    26 comments

    • Kent  •  Elkhart, United States  •  4 months ago
      It kind of serves TV right. They've been presenting some pretty lazy programming for years because it's cheap. How many "reality" shows do we need? Meanwhile shows that are well written, acted and produced are rarely given the chance to build an audience before some network executive pulls the plug. I'm intrigued about the comment about new media not being able to overtake TV because it's so entrenched. Isn't that exactly what TV did to radio? There is already some very apealing content being produced for the web. Check out Mercury Men sometime. It's not going to be long before a few college kids with a green screen and a free copy of Blender produce a program that will give some network execs a heart attack and do it for a few hundred dollars. There's going to be some garbage along the way, but I'm excited to see what will happen.
      • Tom 4 months ago
        Obviouly you haven't seen the garbage passed off as original internet programming.

        Also, you are also obviously ignorant of the past. You see...internet broadcast NEEDS cable TV to exist.. TV didn't need radio to exist.

        Imagine if Burger King couldn't survive unless McDonalds agreed to sell Whoppers at their stores and give Burger King all the money from the sales. You'd say they have no chance, wouldn't you?

        Well..since the cable TV providers are also the internet providers, that is exactly what is happening with TV.

        Not to mention...thigns aren't somehow cheaper just because they are online. If internet programming wanted to have ANY kind of quality, they would have to start pouring more money into the budgets of these shows. And to do that, you would see 8-9 minutes of commercials for every 22 minutes of programming.
      • Paul 4 months ago
        Who are YOU kidding, Tom ? Cable programming is not only as bad as the networks, but the commercials are even MORE ubiquitous. Be afraid, cable operators, be VERY afraid !
      • Kent 3 months ago
        Tom, I'm very familiar with the history. I've worked in the broadcasting industry for 25 years. I think your analogy is flawed. You are confusing cable networks with cable providers. Comcast doesn't really care who produces the content as long as the content provides a compelling reason for customers to pay for cable. I think that the traditional model of a network providing 24/7 content will probably be displaced by individual content creators placing their products on central hubs like YouTube and Netflix. Does Disney need ABC to delivery Once Upon A Time to it's audience? The model will change. The smart companies will adapt.

        My point, and I stand by it, is that networks (cable & over the air) deserve a little scare. They've become lazy and complacent

        I have seen garbage that is presented as original Internet programming. I have also seen garbage being pumped out of my cable box. I have also seen very well acted and well written internet programs and what's more some of the Internet "garbage" makes one think "this has potential with a little polish". In some cases we're seeing the early sketch books the next generation of great artists...people who are willing to experiment and take a few chances. I think that's exciting.

        As far as cost goes, of course things can be done cheaper with a model that is based on Internet distribution. Internet distribution allows for small independent producers and hobbiests to get into the game. Small independent producers can take consumer cameras, local talent, unknown writers and off the shelf software and produce some pretty interesting programs. Yes, the overall quality of production might be a little less glossy, but a well acted, well written product can overcome a lack of glitz.

        Also, we're already seeing the sort of ratio of programming to commercial. I've seen more than one show that comes in at less than 45 minutes on demand with no commercials for a one hour program.

        The model is changing. Competition will be good. It will be fun to see new ideas and new players waking up what has become a stagnant industry.
    • italoman9  •  Lynn, United States  •  4 months ago
      Someday, nobody will have plain "traditional" TV sets anymore. Instead, we'll have giant combination Internet-television media screens replicating our laptop computer screens of today.
      • jeremy 4 months ago
        think we already have that my tv has internet capabilities plus i can hook my computer up to it.
    • Albert  •  Los Angeles, United States  •  4 months ago
      I want them to pick up Firefly, Arrested Development, and Terminator: Sarah Connor Chronicles. I hate reality TV. The Kardashians can go burn in hell.
    • Rickie  •  4 months ago
      Great - forty billion channels, and nothing worth watching....
    • A Yahoo! User  •  4 months ago
      It's kind of sad. I remember not 20 years sitting and watching television and seeing stuff I thought was really good and they can't do that anymore for some reason. television has become really lazy in a lot of ways. I don't think the internet will neccesarily replace it, but television will slowly fade away and people will be occupied with other things in their life.

      I'll probably just watch some old stuff on my television on DVD BLU-whatever.
      • Zahrastory 4 months ago
        I know what you mean about it being sad. And, why a big-name actor like Tom Hanks would want to contribute to the decline of the TV medium by making a web series, when he could do a TV show instead, is beyond me.
    • Mimi  •  Meriden, United States  •  4 months ago
      are you listening Prospect Park - SOMEONE get AMC and OLTL up and running before it is too late!! abc sucks
      • susanf 4 months ago
        i agree. i miss those shows. maybe some company with common sense will try
    • C Minus  •  4 months ago
      Morgan Spurlock should be in the failure club after how badly his last movie did
    • All the Same  •  4 months ago
      "And even though critics question whether new media can rival a business that's been around for about 70 years,..."

      That's what they said about radio shows back in the day.
    • Paul  •  Wichita, United States  •  4 months ago
      The cable operators, much like Netflix and movie renters before them will ignore any shot at being reasonable and listening to their customers complaints about service, commercial proliferation, lack of quality channels, etc until it is WAY too late. The ones that survive WILL have to offer ala carte channels and much less having to pay for unwatched channels. The rest will NOT be missed !
    • Lobster_del_Amor  •  4 months ago
      Bring back Italian Spiderman
    • robert  •  4 months ago
      I want all the old shows on the internet, shows from the 1950,s 1960,s etc. I get a lot of them but not all of them.
    • Christopher  •  Tampa, United States  •  4 months ago
      Yawn
    • Jalek  •  4 months ago
      The networks had their choice to go with the new media formats or hire teams of lawyers to try to sue them away. They made their choice.
    • doug flanigan  •  Birmingham, United States  •  4 months ago
      maybe we will get the real news then and not what they wont us to here
      • juan 4 months ago
        maybe they'll have online education too.
      • robert 4 months ago
        WONT? HERE? Great Spelling.
    • Tiffany F  •  Denver, United States  •  4 months ago
      and at the forefront of bringing TV and the internet together?? Joss Whedon several years ago, with Dr. Horrible, during the writer's strike. Everyone else is just now getting in the game.
    • Richard  •  4 months ago
      "No one is suggesting that the quality on the Internet is close to that of broadcast TV..."
      ...Riiiiight. Because the Internet doesn't have anything CLOSE to the quality of "Allen Gregory," "Barney & Friends," "The Borgias," "The Chevy Chase Show," "Cop Rock," "The Spike," "Supertrain," "Charlie's Angels 2011," "Viva Laughlin," "Our Little Genius," "You're in the Picture," "My Mother the Car," "Celebrities Uncensored," "Fame," "Galactica 1980," "Baby Talk," "Coupling," "The Hathaways," "The Grubbs," "Me and the Chimp" -- stop me when I hit something that beats typing rants on Yahoo -- "The Ropers," Dennis Miller doing color commentary for the NFL, "Maury," "Osbornes: Reloaded"...........
    • Jon Melton  •  Bloomfield, United States  •  4 months ago
      Jake how about a complete sentence explaining the subject better.
    • GD  •  Beaverton, United States  •  4 months ago
      Kill it! Make it stop!
    • Ed  •  Bremerton, United States  •  4 months ago
      I wonder how many infomercials there will be. YouTube sucks. It is now their tube.
    • Thomas  •  Columbus, United States  •  4 months ago
      Why no mention of the new internet network GBTV??? They are putting out a lot of programming, high quality and entertaining!!!!