Developing

Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Paralysed Man To Ask For Right To Die

    A father who is paralysed from the neck down and unable to speak is to seek permission from a judge for a doctor to lawfully end his life.

    Tony Nicklinson, 57, had a stroke in 2005, which left him with "locked in syndrome".

    He is totally dependent on his family and can only communicate by blinking his eyes.

    But the father-of-two is mentally competent and describes his life as "dull, miserable, demeaning, undignified and intolerable".

    Mr Nicklinson says only his physical incapacity is preventing him from committing suicide.

    His lawyers Bindmans have lodged papers in the Family Division of the High Court arguing that a doctor should have a "common law defence of necessity" against any murder charge.

    The defence has been used in the past to argue that a person must be allowed to respond to an urgent situation by breaking the law.

    If the judge agreed, it wouldn't make doctor-assisted euthanasia legal. But it would protect a doctor from legal action.

    Mr Nicklinson said: "What I have to look forward to is a wretched ending with uncertainty, pain and suffering while my family watch on helplessly.

    "Why must I suffer these indignities? 

    "If I was able-bodied I could put an end to my life when I want to."

    Solicitor Saimo Chahal said: "This will be a test case and raises many difficult legal, moral and ethical questions about euthanasia.

    "Tony's case is a very compelling one."

    But Dr Peter Saunders of the anti-euthanasia group Care Not Killing said: "We are opposed to any weakening of the law. 

    "There is no right to die in Britain."

     

    158 comments

    • MALCOLM  •  5 months ago
      I feel for Mr Nicklinson. It is time we had a proper debate in this country over the issue. I support Dignity in Dying who are campaigning for a change in the law.
      • spudge 5 months ago
        malcom all for that ... and such debates have taken place again and again .. with not too much headway being made .. due to some small minded , often religious and prolife.. extremists winning the argument by default . and all too willing to force someone like mr nicklinson... and others to endure a quaility of life where they have no independance and from their view point .. very little in the way of dignity either . forced in hope of a better future ,a future they wouldn`t have if they won the right to end their own life .
    • Kiwi  •  5 months ago
      How can we show compassion to animals and end their life when they have less problems than this poor gentleman, yet leave him to suffer the seemingly endless days ahead? Give each person the right to choose for themselves NOT some faceless person who doesn't have to live that non- life!
      • Watch_Out! 5 months ago
        There are arguments for and against Euthanasia.
      • A Bear Behind ♀ 5 months ago
        That's very true about animals, pets in particular. We take their lives without their permission because they're old and sick but deny lucid human beings the right to choose when they want to die. It's insanity.
        Nobody chooses when they arrive in this world but we should all have the right to choose when we leave it.
      • c0bblerz 5 months ago
        WIM, stand at Tony Nicklinson's bedside and tell him that - it's HIS life (lack of it) that's the issue. It's well for the healthy and able-bodied ( and those terminally ill who are NOT in pain) to object or "argue" about it - but it's not a right for same to say to someone like Mr Nicklinson that he doesn't get a choice, hasn't got a choice, will just have to ' grin and bear it' because that's more... "civilised".
    • jane  •  5 months ago
      Hang on a sec - people have been using human rights to get their way for years, surely by denying this man gthe right to die we are violating his human rights. It would be great to see them used for good for a change.
      • Snoozy 5 months ago
        Well said!!!!
      • AMANDA 5 months ago
        THIS IS SOMETHING GOOD? ARE U HUMAN ? R U MAD UR SO EVIL HOW IS THIS GOOD HOW IS SOMEONES DEATH GOOD.
      • TartanForever 5 months ago
        Amanda take a step back ... Jane is not saying death is good she IS saying that a human being should have his own right of choice how long his suffering should go on for ! This is not a Man just a bit peeved with a bad day but someone who knows fully well that all the pain & suffering he has endured so far will never end & eventually worsen ... No-One can possibly judge how they would feel when ACTUALLY faced with that situ but the law of humanity should allow each of us decide if capable INCLUDING the other way & insist on being allowed to fight for a miracle if they so wish !!!!
    • rosella  •  5 months ago
      This Man has a right to say enough,when theres no Dignity and Quality of life we should have the right, No one would let an Animal suffer this way,thinking of him and his Family xx
    • funion  •  5 months ago
      animals have better rights in these terms. If you kept an animal suffering like this you'd be hauled over the coals!! But tough luck for people!! I hope everyhing works out for Tony and his family and he is allowed his dignity x
      • Jen 5 months ago
        That's right, Funion, the RSPCA would take you to court and win.
    • allyson  •  5 months ago
      Before my hubby died from cancer he made a living will. His wish not to be resusitated, and forced to live in a state he found unacceptable, was very hard to deal with.
      A person should not be made to suffer. When they've had enough, let them go with dignity.
      • K M T 5 months ago
        My dear old Dad did the same...he signed a DNR [do not resuscitate] with my blessing.
      • spotty 5 months ago
        Do you both carry DNR notices with you so that medics can safely pass you by if they are called to a medical emergency involving you? It would save a lot of time at car crashes if you did.
    • Eddie  •  5 months ago
      His life, his choice!
    • LeonE  •  5 months ago
      Let the poor bloke choose his own fate.
    • Queggys88  •  5 months ago
      I back Mr Nicklinson 100% of the way. My Gran has Alzheimer's, is in palliative care, can't walk, talk, eat, sit herself up or any other function- except sleep, smile eakly and occasionally move her mouth. As much as we love our families, the indignities of a life like this should overturn a High Court arguement about human rights. Human rights mean that nobody has to suffer at the hands of another being. If ending their suffering through euthanasia means that these people will no longer be in any mental, physical or psychological pain, then our hospitals should be given the go ahead. Abortion is legal, if it is legal to end a life at the start, why should it be illegal to end it at the end?
    • Paul  •  5 months ago
      if this man wants to have his miserable existance ended then nobody should be able to stand in his way, you would not let a dog suffer the humiliation this poor man has to put up with so grant him his wish and be done with it
    • Kayleigh  •  5 months ago
      I absolutely agree with the comments posted so far. LIfe is hard enough as it is without people dictating whether or not you can live or die. If he were able bodied with a terminal illness he would have at least the choice of taking himself to a clinic in Switzerland. You wouldn't let a dog suffer so why let a human suffer such indignities?
    • karl  •  5 months ago
      let the man go in peace.he is obviously tortured by his condition.he must feel so guilty and helpless at the same time. we should let people go if they wish.his family will at least know that this is what he wanted.
    • Janey  •  5 months ago
      There's no question in my mind if a close relative of mine was in this terrible situation I'd help them to die. I wouldn't hesitate if asked and be prepared to take the consequences.
    • Wendy  •  5 months ago
      Well said Funion - Drugs eventually do not work and there is just so much his family can do for him. "Care in the Community" is a joke. May you find peace Tony.
    • TartanForever  •  5 months ago
      WE are all individuals & as such what one is prepared to suffer is not that of others possible choices . This is not a case of a comatosed person , with others doing their thinking for them , but one of a Man obviously with full mental intelligence of his long term prognosis & clearly making his own choices . Given he has made it clear under his own devices he would end his miserable existence I feel deeply for him that unlike the comatosed he is fully aware that others are prolonging his agony through nothing but thoughts of their own position in the matter !!! I wish him either a miracle recovery or a merciful release !
    • P  •  5 months ago
      God bless this man and I hope he wins his case its his life and he should be alowed to die if thts his wish
    • steven  •  5 months ago
      We all have a right to die if we want to.
    • TONE  •  5 months ago
      It's strange how "human rights" don't cover real humane issues like this but it covers criminals and immigrants.
    • Liza  •  5 months ago
      We ALL have a right to die. When was this law made that we all have to go on living long after there is no chance of any quality of life? Death is as natural as birth and the only person who can decide if a life is worth living is the person living it.
    • Necropink  •  5 months ago
      Of course this man should be allowed to end his own life with dignity as he is mentally competent and therefore fully understands what this would mean for his loved ones.