what about the other bird in the back? Is she just a bloody ghost?

woman in the back is counter-terrorism director Audrey Tomason. the paper produces a men-only version that publicly removes images of women because they claim they can be sexually suggestive !!!??? that's the story and that's the wacky US for ya :o)

Sexually suggestive? There isn't enough whiskey and viagra to make me think of Hillary in a sexually suggestive way.

What can you believe in the future from this paper?

"Respecting women for who they are and what they do, and not what they look like??"
Absurd! The woman is secretary of state and incredibly accomplished. It's not like she's sitting in her underwear, she's doing an incredibly important job with the surrounding men most of whom she 'out ranks'. A simple case of sexism wrapped up in religious excuses. Disgusting.

Maybe the woman at the back wandered in by mistake: `Excuse me, is this Human Resources.....?`

Guess Osama Bin Laden is not the only religious fanatic about.

Isn't there a little contradiction with the value of honesty in choosing to publish a dishonest photo?

Once again the Jewish lobby lets this pass over (excuse the pun) without any serious condemnation by the establishment. As one other commenter hinted; let it be the other way around and once more the `anti-semitism` cry would ring out. What a pity the money is not in the hands of the majority of the `other ranks`.

We can believe nothing that the news has to offer. Everything is a lie.

Supposing Hillary and the other lady were Jews the uproar from this same newspaper will tear down Wallstreet. It shows how 'truthful' these papers are.

How can they be sorry for something delibrately done?
Why say sorry now when you've done what you wanted to do?
Even though I'm not for or against Clinton but it is very clear that this was intentionally and well edited.
It leads me to question the validity of most stuff we read and see on the newspapers!
For me the papers should explain how hard it was to copy the picture in its original form and paste on their conniving newspaper.

sexist
what about the women in the background that missing too

Looks like it was the same person who faked the "Bin Laden" pics.

Surrounded by religious fruitcakes - frightening

Hers was the only human reaction amongst the red-necks.First time I have seen that side of her.We don`t know what was on screen at that precise moment....maybe a fellow woman being savagely wounded?One of the men has a wry side-of-mouth enjoyment smile.Any killing is wrong,that`s why the yanks get into trouble in the first place.They love using that old Machiavellian excuse to wreak havoc around the world.
To find out about the real threat to our freedom for starters check out Adrian Hilton`s Principality and Power of Europe,even the front cover shouts out.America`s a done deal,6 supreme court judges are now RC and the other 3 Jewish(now an annex of Rome,just as Cof E is).Europe is due for the biggest shakedown in it`s history.Bye-bye democracy as we have known it in the UK.

Just a lot of Eve deniers! They are probably still sore at losing that rib.

For those of you asking "what about the other woman/women"

How about you read the article? It clearly states the newspaper removed ALL the women from the room INCLUDING Secretary of State blah blah blah!

This is another evidence showing everything they do is scandal... and they want to take their word for whatever they say

Never ever forget, "We, the Jewish people CONTROL America, and the Americans know it".