Developing

Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Syria: UN Assembly Passes New Resolution

    The United Nations General Assembly has passed a resolution condemning the violence in Syria by a margin of 137 to 12.

    The non-binding resolution also condemns "continued and widespread violations of human rights" in the country.

    The text offers full support for the Arab League's plan for peaceful political transition in Syria, a plan that calls for President Assad to hand over power to his deputy.

    Western diplomats hoped the high number of "yes" votes would send a strong signal to President Assad's regime about the strength of opinion in the international community.

    Foreign Secretary William Hague said: "The message is unambiguous. The violence must stop immediately."

    He added: "I look forward to discussing how we can support the Arab League further at the Friends of Syria meeting next week."

    Syria's ambassador to the UN said the resolution would contribute further chaos and crisis in his country, and accused the UN of meddling in its internal affairs.

    He maintained the government was taking steps to address the legitimate concerns of the Syrian people, and did not need any intervention from outside.

    As well as Syria, 11 countries including Russia, China, and Iran, voted against the resolution. North Korea, Belarus, Zimbabwe and Cuba also opposed it. There were 17 abstentions. 

    Russia had attempted to water the resolution down by introducing amendments but they were rejected by Arab sponsors of the original draft.

    After the vote, US ambassador to the UN Susan Rice tweeted: "The UN General Assembly has just sent a clear message to the people of Syria: The world stands with you."

    Top Russian diplomat, Gennady Gatilov, said the draft was too close to the UN Security Council resolution it vetoed along with China two weeks ago, which backed an Arab League call for President Bashar al Assad to quit.

    "We can't vote for that resolution, because it still remains unbalanced," Gatilov said. "It directs all the demands at the government, and says nothing about the opposition."

    France indicated the Arab-led initiative at the Assembly was proposed in order to establish humanitarian channels into the country to ease the suffering of the population, and not - contrary to Russia's argument - to enact regime change.

    Opening the discussions, Syria's envoy to the United Nations Bashar Ja'afari repeated his government's position regarding "terrorist attacks in Syria," calling on other members to "stop adding fuel to the fire of violence and sectarian strife in Syria".

    Ahead of the vote, UN chief Ban Ki-moon renewed his calls for an end to the violence in Syria and urged the international community to find a common response to the unrest.

    "What is important at this time is that first the Syrian authorities must stop killing their own people," he said. 

    "This violence should stop from all sides whether by national security forces or by opposition forces.

    "I urge the international community to speak in one voice: stop the violence. Stop the bloodshed. The longer we debate, the more people will die."

    New video of the onslaught in Homs shows buildings collapsing and large parts of the city in ruins.

    Activists say residents in the country's most rebellious city are going without food and electricity, and are struggling to cope after nearly two weeks of intense bombardment and shelling.

    International rights watchdogs have said over 400 people have been killed in Homs since February 4. Tanks continue to roll down streets lined with wrecked homes and businesses.

    Another video has emerged of an explosion in the Syrio-Lebanese border town of Zabadani which has also come under fierce assault by government forces fearful of Free Syrian Army personnel operating so close to the capital Damascus. 

    One activist in Deraa - the town in which protests against the president began almost a year ago - described the attacks as "very methodical," saying regime forces were attacking the province "village by village".

    "The (rebel) Free Syrian Army is trying to push them back but it is not equipped and is forced to retreat. Regime troops are taking revenge on residents," he said.

    As the country-wide crackdown goes on, prominent blogger and symbol of the revolution Razan Ghazzawi and other top activists have been arrested. 

    Ghazzawi, as well as prominent human rights activist Mazen Darwish, his wife and 11 others were taken by security forces during a raid on the Syrian Centre for Media and Freedom of Expression, which is located in central Damascus and is headed by Darwish.

    Known as @RedRazan on Twitter, her knowledge of the rebel network, access to its organisers and contact with the West makes her an important voice for many in the opposition. 

    It is the second time the American-born activist has been detained. In December her arrest on the Jordanian border sparked a massive outcry from Syria's international activist network. 

    "We at the Syrian Centre for Legal Studies condemn these arrests and call on Syrian authorities to immediately release them," human rights lawyer Anwar Bunni said.

    Amid the violence, Russia has sought to water down the UN's non-binding resolution and welcomed the regime's pledge to hold a referendum on a new constitution.

    According to diplomats, Moscow has requested that a paragraph referring to the Arab League plan, which would have seen Syria's vice president replace Mr Assad, be changed.

    Another amendment would link the return of Syrian troops to their barracks to an "end of attacks by armed groups against state institutions".

    Russia also wants the opposition "to dissociate themselves from armed groups engaged in acts of violence", and not mention Syrian government abuses against civilians.

    The Arab countries responsible for bringing the resolution to the General Assembly reportedly rejected the Russian requests, but Moscow could still seek to have them inserted when the issue is debated.

    Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov has ruled out any UN resolution "that could legitimise regime change".

    He also said Mr Assad's offer to hold a referendum in two weeks on the constitution, which would lead to elections in 90 days, was "a step forward".

    "It is coming late, unfortunately, but better late than never," Mr Lavrov commented.

    But others poured scorn on the proposed constitution and elections, which would establish a multi-party system and limit the president to two terms of seven years.

    Melhem al Droubi, a member of the opposition Syrian National Council and the Muslim
    Brotherhood, said: "The truth is that Bashar al Assad has increased the killing and slaughter in Syria.

    "He has lost his legitimacy and we aren't interested in his rotten constitutions, old or new."

    The Local Coordinators Union (LCC) also issued a statement, saying: "The draft constitution is no more than a political tool or a policy paper written by the barbaric regime... We see no alternative but to topple the regime."

    The United States called the move "laughable". White House spokesman Jay Carney said: "Promises of reforms have been usually followed by increase in brutality and have never been delivered upon by this regime since the beginning of peaceful demonstrations in Syria."

    The Syrian military continued its offensive against the centres of opposition even as the government announced the referendum.

    A fresh attack was launched on Hama with anti-aircraft guns mounted on the back of armoured vehicles firing into residential neighbourhoods of the city, opposition activists said.

     

    86 comments

    • C. Nicholl  •  3 months ago
      Mr Assad has protected the rights of Christians and other religions to worship without fear or persecution. If the Sunni muslim dominated rebels oust Assad, will the Western world be prepared defend the rights and maybe lives of those people from Muslim fanatics? I think not.
      Mr Hague should look at the possible consequences of his support of this group and not just at the appeasement of the Arab league or his desire to create further issues with Iran.
      • Merlynson 3 months ago
        I get confused between Sunni and #$%$ Islam. It seems one argument is good in one counry and not in another. I believe it is about different interpretations from two brothers, or kin of some sort. I don't believe that either can be called evil but is one more prone to fundamentalism than the other?
      • William 3 months ago
        you will not get Hague to defend anything Christian. If the Muslims get into power, those who follow their messiah, then up goes the Middle East. An Islamic state, in its purity, following the Koran, is an impoverished, warring state, where heads roll, particularly women's.
      • Egidijus 3 months ago
        Will be real mess in Syria,President Assad-Alavit Muslims,opposition Sunni-Muslims,Iran-Shiia who hate both previous.My friend from Syria told that is some true in Syria's envoy words. Let's they sorted out by self.
    • John  •  Stratford Upon Avon, England  •  3 months ago
      in a way he is right no one wants innocent people to die, but what about the other side ? we got gadaffi out for the other side (oil had nothing to do with it ) and look what there doing now
      • Simon S 3 months ago
        They are now the masters enslaving their own people!
    • ZIONIST  •  3 months ago
      I agree with, Sam. A UN that helps terrorists is useless. This non-binding resolution is useless. With a budget in excess of $5 Billion it's time to scrap the whole thing.
    • paul  •  Norwich, England  •  3 months ago
      Well the US of A constantly vetos any resolutions on isreal.....poetic justice or what ...love seeing clinton getting her knickers in a twist........
      • James 3 months ago
        Did you see her diliberately push in front of the chinese deligate in the US this week. No respect. Her husband said he wouldn't drop bombs in Iraq for risk of colateral damage she has no such morale.
      • Vulcan 3 months ago
        Clinton personifies a person who cares about what she perceives as unjust. What she really cares about is her egotistical bloated perception that she has the right no matter what to influence world matters. She disgusts me.
      • Crazy 3 months ago
        All pushy the yanks, think they are bully boys, NOT........FACT
    • Mahmoud Gabiraari  •  Riyadh, Saudi Arabia  •  3 months ago
      The international community should not take sides in this issue but should work to bring the two sides to a peaceful settlement.
      • callum 3 months ago
        That's like saying we should "work to bring God and the Devil to a peaceful settlement". Both sides are utterly opposed to the other - there is no way a peaceful settlement could possibly take place without one side being defeated. As one side has a powerful army, and one side is a guerilla group (you only need to look at what happened in the aftermath of the Iraq war to show how effective they can be) - this conflict could go on for decades without international support (which doesn't have to include military intervention - merely deciding to stop handing over tonnes of new weapons to Assad will be a decent starting point).
      • Simon S 3 months ago
        Callum what biasness! Why add fuel to fire by supporting the rebels! Why is the West so intent on supporting the rebels! Can some sense prevail for one to see the obvious that the West is doing more harm than any good; it’s actually fomenting trouble than doing any good at all to the Syrian people!

        You in the West, would you accept an armed insurrection on your streets in the name of 'freedom' and democratisation or would you prefer a peaceful transition and negotiation? Why can’t you treat others, respect others the way you treat your own and respect your own?

        Let’s be more logical in our thought process and suggestions!
      • callum 3 months ago
        Oh the irony at you calling for logic and peace....

        1. Nothing I said is pro-rebels.
        2. I said that foreign countries should stop supplying the conflict with additional arms. How on earth does handing over more and more weapons result in peace? Yes I specified Assad, but that is because there is no official supply of weapons to the Rebels. Should France for example start shipping them weapons, then I'd say the same about them.
    • MARTIN  •  London, England  •  3 months ago
      Why is it acceptable that other countries can have a say in a cival war. If the west had a civil war and then China got involved I would be pretty pissed. People we really need to start thinking
      • Dark Avenger 3 months ago
        I wonder how cameron's Government would have reacted during the summer riots if the rioters had picked armes agains the Government. If the Chinese or the Russians had started to supply arms to the rioter.???
      • Raieth 3 months ago
        Its already happened in the past.
    • God  •  Dundee, Scotland  •  3 months ago
      Mankind must put an end to war , or war " will " put an end to mankind .
    • NICKKY  •  Centro, Mexico  •  3 months ago
      This make me feel so sad :(
    • bikko  •  3 months ago
      Zimbabwe? allowed to vote? is this a joke?
    • River  •  3 months ago
      Maybe our government should spend more time worrying Britain then the state of everyone else. We can't even deport Bin Laden's right hand man and we want to protect these 'rebels'. The same rebels that want to kill the Christians? Really Mr Hague?
    • Home  •  Lagos, Nigeria  •  3 months ago
      China and Russia,keep it up.What happened in Libya should not repeat itself.Obama has continue to show sign that he love Muslim even more than the Muslim,fundamentalist them selves.He has tried so much in breeding potential enemies for the United States and I am sure that he will not be in power when the problem / fight will start and I am very sure that then,they are going to use the same military weapons of the USA to fight the USA making it impossible for USA to win.Please stop creating problems for your successors.Leave Assad alone as he is with the majority of the people behind him unless you are saying that Democracy is no longer by highest number.
    • Leonel  •  Manchester, England  •  3 months ago
      Amnesty international published a report today condemning torture and the abuse caused by the rebels in Libya by and the complete lack of security which will drive the country into a bloody civil war. Sky is turning a blind eye on what's currently occuring in Libya and instead continues to spread lies about the situation in Syria backing 100% the so called activists stories. Don't believe what the corporate bias media like Sky News is broadcasting , they are NATO tools to justify and declare war against other countries.
    • jules  •  3 months ago
      Thank you Russia, not another Libya. Veto on SYRIA LIKE usa VETO ON ISRAEL..
    • River  •  3 months ago
      Up yours Muslim Brotherhood terrorists. This is the most evil Islamist group.
    • Taniesha  •  3 months ago
      Russia must stand firm - and not to give in to black mail. The real civilised world must NOT allow a repeat of the Libya scenario, and Iraq before that. China and Russia are two voices of sanity in the world today. Hope they continue to block US/NATO aggression.
    • weapons of mass-humanitar ...  •  London, England  •  3 months ago
      The "opposition" did not want the local government elections that were held; the "opposition" did not want direct talks with the government unless the leader of the country first stepped down, in spite the clear fact that he continues to have majority support in the country; the "opposition" refuses to join the hundreds of thousands of ordinary Syrians who reject and denounce acts of violence by the illegal "Free Syrian Army"; the "opposition refuses talks mediated by a UN SC veto-holder; the "opposition" rejects voting on a new constitution. It is easy to see why these might be referred to as "opposition". Does anyone, anywhere know what they are in favour of? And more importantly, are they entitled to this demand by force of democratic number?
    • Ms hiroshi  •  3 months ago
      The evil satanic organisation called BBC, consisting mainly of Zionists and very senior members of the Freemasons have spread their evil tentacles over most of the UK and launched this country on a programme of continuous conflicts and war.

      The NWO controls world finances, world politics, the UN, WHO, the ICJ, the judicial system, education, police and the military via its arm - NATO.

      The heartland of the NWO are the Rothschild’s, members of the EU Royal Families, the Pilgrim Society, the very senior members of the Freemason´s (including many MP´s and members of the House of Lords), the Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham House London), Friends of Israel and The Bank of England etc. Good to see Russia and China standing firm
    • sam  •  3 months ago
      this rubbish garbage of a report is not fit for reading - thank you Yahoo News..
    • R  •  3 months ago
      i do not always agree with russian views, but this time she does have have it right.
      both sides should put down weapons and stop fighting.now both sides are doing the same thing to each other.
      look at libya a shambles and it will as sure as night follows day, blow apart again.
      the different areas/tribes will never agree.
    • Terry  •  Manchester, England  •  3 months ago
      The "protests" did not emanate from internal political cleavages as described by the mainstream media. From the very outset, they were the result of a covert US-NATO intelligence operation geared towards triggering social chaos, with a view to eventually discrediting the Syrian government of Bashar Al Assad and destabilizing Syria as a Nation State.
      Since the middle of March 2011, Islamist armed groups --covertly supported by Western and Israeli intelligence-- have conducted terrorist attacks directed against government buildings including acts of arson. Amply documented, trained gunmen and snipers including mercenaries have targeted the police, armed forces as well as innocent civilians. There is ample evidence, as outlined in the Arab League Observer Mission report, that these armed groups of mercenaries are responsible for killing civilians.