Developing

Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Amazement As Particles 'Beat Light Speed'

    Scientists from all over the world are examining the results of an experiment that seems to disprove one of the cornerstones of modern physics.

    Experts at the European Organisation for Nuclear Research (Cern) in Switzerland believe they have clocked particles called neutrinos travelling faster than the speed of light.

    But they cannot quite believe it themselves, they say, because according to Einstein's famous 1905 equation, E=mc2, it is simply impossible.

    "The feeling that most people have is this can't be right, this can't be real," said James Gillies, a spokesman for Cern.

    According to Einstein, the speed of light, 186,282 miles per second (299,792km per second) is a "cosmic constant" and nothing in the universe can travel faster, because physical objects have a mass, whereas light does not.

    Cern says a neutrino beam fired from a particle accelerator near Geneva to a lab 454 miles (730km) away in Italy arrived 60 nanoseconds faster than the speed of light.

    The claim has been met with a range of responses from scientists, with some expressing amazement while others dismissed it as a mistake.

    "The feeling that most people have is this can't be right, this can't be real," said James Gillies, a spokesman for Cern.

    He said the readings have so astounded researchers that they are asking others to independently verify the measurements before claiming an actual discovery.

    "They are inviting the broader physics community to look at what they have done and really scrutinise it in great detail," he said.

    Dr David Whitehouse, a space scientist and author, said that if the experiment is proved to be true then it would be a revelation on a par with Einstein's own theories.

    "It is an earthquake, a revolution in physics," he said.

    "As soon as you are arrogant enough to think you understand the universe, the universe comes along and shows you are not right."

    Dr Whitehouse said the findings technically meant that time travel might be possible.

    "Everything is now open - because time, speed and the speed of light are all linked."

    However, one physicist based in Melbourne, Australia, concluded that the startling claim was simply the result of an error.

    Dr John P Costella said the group at Cern had made an "embarrassing gaffe" by miscalculating the experiment's statistical uncertainty.

    "One must conclude that (the team) has simply made a mistake, albeit a highly embarrassing one which has gathered international media coverage," he said.

    University of Maryland physics department chairman Drew Baden called it "a flying carpet", something that was too fantastic to be believable.

    Scientists at the competing Fermilab in Chicago have promised to try to replicate the results.

    "It is a shock," said Fermilab head theoretician Stephen Parke, who was not part of the research in Geneva.

    "It is going to cause us problems, no doubt about that - if it is true."

    The Chicago team had similar faster-than-light results in 2007, but those came with a giant margin of error that undercut its scientific significance.

     

    734 comments

    • WILLIAM D  •  8 months ago
      History may record that this may just be the moment in time that mankind relinquished the past and grasped the future .
      It is , if proved correct , monumental.
      • Kzinti Occupation Force 8 months ago
        True. Hell of a big *if*, though.
      • Mike 8 months ago
        Or it may record this day as the one when CERN found out that their clock was off
      • Kenneth 8 months ago
        Or Ryanair had said it had arrived in Italy when in fact it was still in Southern France!
    • John  •  8 months ago
      Well this bound to be objects in the universe that move faster than the speed of light, because at the beginning of the universe space expanded faster than the speed of light according to some and then you got that particle called Tachyon which havent been discovered which cant go below the speed of light, so there is bound to be something out there thats faster after all it is a big universe out there and scientists can be wrong sometimes like with they mesured the expansion rate of the cosmos, they thought it was slowing down and as we now know its speeding up

      But if these ghost particles are faster, it will be fantastic
      • Joe 8 months ago
        No there aren't "bound" to objects that move faster than the speed of light, there is nothing in physics to say the expansion of space time has a speed limit, but space has no mass by definition, but when something with mass travels as fast or faster than the speed of light, it is truly baffling because according to Einstein for something with mass to go as fast or even faster than the speed of light it would require an infinite amount of energy, although neutrinos have next to no mass they still have a tiny portion. I wonder what discovery's will come of this. It is a very exiting time to be a physicist.
    • salloo  •  8 months ago
      chalo g what would be next then? it's an extra ordinary news
    • Larry  •  8 months ago
      Scientists in general can only claim to be right at the time of the latest discovery. Remember Dr. Roger Bannister and thousands of other discoveries
    • kittylitter  •  7 months ago
      Well if it improves royal mail letter delivery times I'm satisfied.
    • kittylitter  •  7 months ago
      Does this mean we can now expect even faster emails? Like say I receive all tomorrows emails today?
    • Dum Dum  •  8 months ago
      What is Light?
      • tony g 8 months ago
        Its electromagnetic radiation in the visible part of that spectrum, it is emitted as photons
      • Bad Kitty 8 months ago
        Light is the opposite to hard as it is possible to sleep with a light on. :-)
      • namron 8 months ago
        Light is something that appears when one switches on...
    • Woody  •  8 months ago
      Albert Einstein like everyone else before him used the past and current details to come to his conclusions, and so he therefore relied on a fact being a fact. He found that the mathematics of the time were inadequate and came up with his own mathematics which very few of the elite understood. A remarkable feat for a guy who worked in a patent office. Nobody can't take anything away from Einstein if some of his theories turn out to be wrong or not quite right. Without Einstein the world would be a very different place. Einstein made the worlds cleverest people look stupid. They laughed at his ideas at first but they soon stopped laughing. He was brilliant and deserves his place in history.
      • Ozzy 8 months ago
        He also laughed at other brilliant scientists and rebuked them publicly..
      • incognito55 8 months ago
        I wouldnt know a neutrino if it hit me in the head,but what I do know is any new theory from science invariably confirms the Bible .And that includes Einsteins theory of relativity.
      • Harry 8 months ago
        And how do you come to that conclusion Incognito?
    • Neil  •  8 months ago
      I need to get myself some neutrino broadband.
      • Kenneth 8 months ago
        Probably get about 4 meg on Virgin
    • bernie78  •  8 months ago
      einstein will probably still be right about anything as large as an atom or more-it seems logical that for a given energy input a fractional part of an atom could travel marginally faster having less mass but as with most complicated theories the reality will turn out to be simple and uncomplicated as did the sonic barrier
    • Dave  •  8 months ago
      This doesn't mean Albert Einstein was wrong, any more than his theory of Special Relativity meant Isac Newton was wrong. We still use Newton's Equations of Motion, and they still work for 90% of cases. We use Einstein's equations in situations where Newton's don't work (where high acceleration is involved, for example). E = mc2 is still perfectly valid (Nuclear Fission and Fusion still works doesn't it?). This evidence may indicate an area of physics where Einstein's theories don't apply, but it does not invalidate any of his work. This is appallingly bad science writing.
    • Robert  •  8 months ago
      another reason to live forever; gotta know the ANSWER!
    • paul  •  8 months ago
      This is old info, they have known Neutrinos are faster than light, for years. My great Uncle told me when i was about 8. Whats all the fuss about!
    • REALIST  •  8 months ago
      Oh dear , I want my Uni fees back they LIED to me, My whole education is based on a lie hahahaha
    • Robert  •  8 months ago
      The was young man called Bright
      Who travelled faster than Light
      He went out one day
      In a relative way
      And came back the previous Night.
    • Ken  •  8 months ago
      If the neutrino really is a mass-less particle, then it need not be a breach of the Special or General Theories of Relativity which demonstrate that Mass increases with velocity and becomes infinite if the object reaches the speed of light. In other words there is not enough energy in the Universe to accelerate any particle with a finite mass to, c, the speed of light.
      But if the mass of the particle is zero to start with then Einsteins work still holds.
    • JOHN  •  8 months ago
      if you go at light speed in your car , what happens when you put the lights on ? ....
    • stuart X.  •  8 months ago
      The scientists always bang on about facts and now it seems that they have been basing over a hundred years of facts on a flawed set of paramiters...now that has got to hurt the geeks!
    • skypoetone  •  8 months ago
      To say something is "impossible" reflects the inadequacy of ones knowledge. By this I mean in the universe, if truly infinite, things we consider impossible are miniscule.
    • A Yahoo! User  •  8 months ago
      OMG/Faster than light=TIME TRAVEL