YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    UK to tackle listing rules as Bumi debacle escalates

    LONDON, Sept 27 (Reuters) - London's ambitions to attract

    foreign-owned mining companies have suffered a sharp blow with

    the announcement by Bumi Plc of an inquiry into

    alleged irregularities at subsidiaries, just days before a

    clamp-down on listing rules.

    The Financial Services Authority (FSA) will publish

    proposals next Tuesday designed to protect investors and ease

    concerns that London-listed companies such as Bumi, an

    Indonesian coal venture co-founded by financier Nat Rothschild,

    are diluting standards of corporate governance.

    Bumi's launch of an inquiry this week into potential

    irregularities in more than $500 million of funds follows

    unrelated concerns at fellow natural resources firm ENRC

    and oil producer Genel.

    "Bumi is one of a number of recently listed companies that,

    whilst traded on the UK market, is essentially an overseas

    business," said PIRC, a corporate governance consultant that

    advises pension funds and fund managers with combined assets of

    over 1.5 trillion pounds ($2.44 trillion).

    PIRC noted concerns shared by regulators and investors

    about groups with dominant shareholders in which relatively few

    shares are traded on the market. "A number of such companies in

    the extractives industries have a very limited free float,

    meaning that minority shareholders can struggle to have their

    voices heard, and unusual governance practices are difficult to

    challenge," it said.

    The FSA proposals are expected to tighten rules on reverse

    takeovers - often seen as backdoor listings - as well as

    addressing the size of free floats, the power of controlling

    shareholders, corporate governance and the independence of

    company boards.

    They are also likely to prevent cash shell companies, small

    listed companies into which larger private groups are typically

    folded in a reverse takeover, from joining London's top indices.

    Pushing some new listings onto "regulatory light" standard

    listings, rather than premium listings, might not seem too

    onerous for those seeking cash quickly. But preventing them from

    joining the prestigious FTSE indices will protect tracker fund

    investors from unwittingly placing cash in riskier companies.

    Nevertheless, experts concede the FSA's powers to improve

    corporate governance are limited. As it tries to strike a

    balance between tightening rules and ensuring London remains

    attractive for international companies the principle of "caveat

    emptor" - let the buyer beware - rules.

    "If you comply with listing rules, there is often very

    little the FSA can do," said one source familiar with the

    regulator. "It is ultimately up to individual shareholders

    whether they buy into that particular company."

    IRREGULARITIES

    Bumi was born after London-listed cash shell Vallar - led by

    41-year-old Rothschild, the hedge fund veteran and scion of the

    Rothschild banking dynasty, and James Campbell, the former head

    of Anglo American's coal arm - engineered a reverse takeover of

    Indonesian coal assets and re-listed in 2011.

    The aim was to marry the Rothschild name to the Bakrie

    brothers, one of Indonesia's most powerful business families, to

    create the world's biggest thermal coal company and one of the

    largest listed groups on the London bourse.

    But as newly-named Bumi joined London's FTSE index, tensions

    rose quickly. A leaked letter last year from Rothschild to Ari

    Hudaya, then chief executive of both Bumi Plc and an affiliate,

    PT Bumi Resources, urged a "radical cleaning up" of

    Jakarta-listed PT Bumi Resources.

    On Monday the company commissioned London law firm

    Macfarlanes to launch an urgent investigation into potential

    financial irregularities at its subsidiaries, including PT Bumi

    Resources, sending its shares spinning.

    Roger Barker, head of corporate governance at the Institute

    of Directors, told the Reuters Russia Investment Summit in

    Moscow that the affair had called into question the "Rothschild

    model" of creating a shell to invest in emerging markets assets.

    "Given what has happened to the share price of that

    particular vehicle, it hasn't been a good deal for investors,

    and investors are going to be looking quite warily at that type

    of approach going forward," he said.

    The story echoes that of ENRC, which has had two separate

    independent probes following whistleblower allegations, one

    involving Kazakh and one its international businesses. The

    results of the first have been presented verbally to Britain's

    Serious Fraud Office. The second is still underway.

    Lawyers expect Bumi's Macfarlanes report also to find its

    way to the SFO. The fraud squad declined to comment.

    Russian firms and companies in the natural resources sector

    have increasingly dominated the trickle of businesses going

    public in London, raising concerns about investor protection.

    The FTSE Group, an index provider owned by the London Stock

    Exchange, has already tightened entry requirements for

    its UK indices. This responded to investors' worries that

    companies with low free floats and hazy corporate governance

    standards could join the FTSE 100 index of top blue-chips too

    easily.

    "I welcome the bar being high, so companies that get there,

    stay there," said Riccardo Orcel, deputy chief executive of

    Russian bank VTB Group.

    London has long been considered the listings hub for natural

    resources companies. But in an effort to broaden its appeal, it

    plans to lift some restrictions for technology listings, paving

    the way for a battle with dominant tech hub New York.