Developing

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    UN watchdog may lower its estimate of "missing" Iran uranium

    * U.N. inspectors seek to clarify Iran uranium "discrepancy"

    * U.S. concerned of possible diversion of nuclear material

    * Iran dismissed it as "absolutely not an issue"

    VIENNA, Aug 16 (Reuters) - The United Nations' atomic

    watchdog may decide that less uranium is missing at an Iranian

    research site than it had previously thought, diplomats say, and

    that may go some way to easing concerns that it may have been

    diverted for military use.

    U.N. inspectors have asked Iran to explain a "discrepancy"

    after an inventory they made last year of natural uranium metal

    and process waste at the Tehran facility showed there was 19.8

    kg less than the Iranian laboratory's own count.

    The United States is concerned the material may have been

    diverted to suspected weapons-related research activity. Iran,

    which says its nuclear programme is entirely peaceful, dismissed

    the reported discrepancy as "absolutely not an issue".

    One Western diplomat said it had since been partly

    "explained" during talks between Iran and the International

    Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the Vienna-based U.N. watchdog, and

    that discussions on the issue were continuing.

    But the details would only become clear in the IAEA's next

    quarterly report on Iran's disputed nuclear programme, expected

    towards the end of August.

    "I've heard that the agency could be revising the figure

    lower," another diplomat said, referring to the report prepared

    ahead of a Sept. 10-14 meeting of the U.N. agency's 35-nation

    board, when Iran is again likely to dominate the agenda.

    A third envoy said it was also his understanding that the

    IAEA's investigation had resulted in a reduction of the

    discrepancy, but he said the research was not yet complete.

    There was no immediate comment from the IAEA or Iran's

    diplomatic mission in the Austrian capital.

    WESTERN CONCERNS

    Experts say such a small quantity of natural uranium could

    not be used to make a bomb, but that the metal could be relevant

    to weapons-linked tests.

    In November last year, the IAEA presented a stash of

    intelligence indicating that Iran has undertaken research and

    experiments that could be relevant for developing atomic arms,

    prompting Western states to ratchet up sanctions on Tehran.

    The IAEA said in previous reports that the discrepancy at

    Jabr Ibn Hayan Multipurpose Research Laboratory (JHL) concerned

    uranium metal conversion experiments from 1995 to 2002.

    Iran has suggested the discrepancy may have been caused by a

    higher amount of uranium in the waste than had been measured by

    the U.N. inspectors.

    The IAEA said in May that Iran had offered to process the

    waste material and extract the uranium, but that the agency had

    offered an alternative way to address the problem.

    A senior U.S. official said late last year the issue

    required "immediate" resolution, citing information indicating

    that "kilogram quantities" of natural uranium metal had been

    made available to Iran's military programme.

    But a European diplomat told Reuters it now seemed to have

    become less of an issue, unlike the issue of Iran's uranium

    enrichment programme and Western suspicions that Tehran is

    seeking to develop a capability to make nuclear weapons.

    The uranium discrepancy was likely to be "buried more than

    it is at the moment", another diplomat said.

    Iran says it is enriching uranium only as fuel for nuclear

    power plants, not atomic weapons, but its refusal to curb the

    activity has drawn increasingly tough sanctions aimed at its oil

    exports.

    Enriched uranium can be used to generate electricity, which

    is Iran's stated aim, or provide material for weapons if refined

    much further, as Western states suspect is Iran's ultimate aim.

    (Editing by Jon Hemming)