Yahoo!. Now with Friends.

Discover news, videos and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    US Paper 'Sorry' Over Bin Laden Raid Photo

    A US newspaper has apologised for doctoring a photograph of senior White House staff watching the Osama bin Laden mission by editing out the women in the room, including Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

    The original photo, showing Mrs Clinton and President Barack Obama in the Situation Room, has made the front pages of newspapers throughout the world.

    The New York-based Yiddish newspaper Der Tzitung explained in a statement it has a long-standing editorial policy to never publish photographs of women, which it says is in keeping with the "laws of modesty" of its Orthodox Jewish readership.

    "The readership of the Tzitung believe that women should be appreciated for who they are and what they do, not for what they look like, and the Jewish laws of modesty are an expression of respect for women, not the opposite," the statement said.

    The picture, taken by a White House photographer on May 1, shows the US president and his national security team seemingly transfixed as they watch the mission to kill the al Qaeda leader. 

    Mrs Clinton is a focal point, seated, with one hand clasped to her mouth.

    But in Der Tzitung's version, there is no trace of her - she is replaced by the digitally reconstituted left shoulder of deputy national security advisor Denis McDonough, whom she had obscured in the original photo.

    Audrey Tomason, the director for counterterrorism and the only other woman in the picture, was also removed from the image.

    The White House distributed the photograph with the standard proviso that it not be "manipulated in any way."

    Der Tzitung, which means "The Newspaper" in Yiddish, said its photo editor, "in his haste", did not read the proviso.

    "The guy got carried away in the euphoria of the victory and he wanted to show what he could do in Photoshop," the paper's editor Albert Friedman said.

    Mrs Clinton was, however, mentioned prominently in the text of the story.

    "In retrospect, we apologise for any misunderstanding that this might have caused," the paper's statement said.

    "We should not have published the altered picture, and we have conveyed our regrets and apologies to the White House and to the State Department."

    The newspaper added that it respected Mrs Clinton for her "unique capabilities, talents and compassion for all" and that she had served public office with "great distinction."

     

    252 comments

    • David  •  9 months ago
      I wonder what the paper would do if the US elect female president.
    • Scott  •  9 months ago
      I wonder if they have a "Recently Married" section in their newspaper? Just a page of photos of grooms, happily arm-in-arm with fresh air....
    • paul  •  9 months ago
      would they have recognised golda meir or also deleted her ?
    • Samantha  •  9 months ago
      So editing women out of history is "appreciating them for who they are and what they do", is it?
    • Rachel  •  9 months ago
      In doing what they thought would be tactful towards women, they've done the exact opposite. How many more offensive blunders do they need to make before realising that men and women alike should be treated as equals, at all times?
    • Rachel  •  9 months ago
      Charming. 'Women should be appreciated for who they are and what they do, not for what they look like'. Hilary Clinton was sitting amongst men on a serious political occasion - not parading on a catwalk.
      It's not a matter of what the women looks like - it's a matter of appreciating her for who she is. Which I thought was the belief of the Tzitung publication.
      Removing the woman from the situation is definitely not appreciating her for who she is and what she does.
    • jemma  •  9 months ago
      Is there something wrong with Muslim and Jewish men where they can't look at a woman without being able to control themselves? I saw one Muslim man make a comment that he thinks rapes would go up if women don't cover their faces, so I wonder if he was speaking about his own urges.
    • Cydoni Trusste  •  9 months ago
      This is hardly a way to convey female empowerment; saying you don't include them in order to not make them a physical object, you are still being sexist by not treating men and women the same. That is what feminism is, not to be seen as better or worse than men; but exactly the same as they are. What would they have done if she had won the presidential election?
    • Sarah  •  6 months ago
      This is hilarious. And people think that Islam is somehow especially oppressive of women? Sorry, guys, but Judaism (and for that matter Christianity) are just Islam's big brothers in the patriarchal religion stakes, and they're all pretty misogynistic, as practised and often as theorised.
    • Marie-France  •  9 months ago
      Editing women out of pictures? Mmmmm maybe they should have asked them to wear burkas to hide their modesty.Seems ironic that the extremist-wings of two religions that consider themselves so different from each other should have such similar views on women in the 21st Century...
    • Keith  •  9 months ago
      I wonder what their photo coverage of the royal wedding looked like then! Pathetic.
    • R  •  9 months ago
      What is the Yiddish word for 'fools'?
    • V  •  9 months ago
      I am appalled at the insult to women who have achieved all Mr. Clinton has achieved. In fact, so angry do I feel that I am almost lost for words.
    • Robert  •  9 months ago
      It is such antiquated Jewish Laws that antagonise people.Why is that Arabs & Jews alike seem to think that Women are to be seen, abused and not heard..I know my wife is an important part of my life and has contributed much to my success
    • Lee  •  9 months ago
      Absolutely pathetic. The statements from the papers spokesmen are just embarrassing - at least be honest about it. If these women were Orthodox Jews then it would sound like a reasonable thing to do, but to remove two very important and influencial national leaders is very sad indeed.
    • Haughair  •  9 months ago
      I hadn't realised that Jews treat their women the same as Islamist fundamentalists!
    • Adrian D  •  9 months ago
      Here we are in 2011 and certain people believe that you cannot publish a photograph of a woman - next they'll be saying the world is only 5000 years old......
    • ANDREW  •  9 months ago
      "The readership of the Tzitung believe that women should be appreciated for who they are and what they do, not for what they look like, and the Jewish laws of modesty are an expression of respect for women, not the opposite."

      So blanking women out is an act of respect? - NO it's an act of oppression, By blanking her photo the paper implies that she is only so much eye candy. "who they are" in this context means she should be a wife - and "what they do" means she should be at home. This is hypocritical cant of the worst kind. - The kind of @#$% that can only come from the mouth of a deeply prejudiced and misogynistic MAN.
    • James  •  9 months ago
      Well Well Well,,, So its not just the Muslims that have a prejudice against Women,,, How would these people react if a woman cop pulled them over for speeding,,, my guess is they would have a huge Hissy Fit!..... God created women for the function of producing children seems to be their thought on the matter.... They have only apologised because they got caught out!
    • Peter  •  9 months ago
      So...
      Simple "not reading the proviso" rookie error, made in the excitement?
      There're bound to be arguments against that, this could have gotten interesting.