Afghanistan: Tony Blair slams 'imbecilic' military pullout and says crisis risks relegating UK to 'second division of global powers'

  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
·4-min read
In this article:
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.

Tony Blair says the crisis in Afghanistan risks relegating the UK to "the second division of global powers".

In a brutal assessment of the West's response to the crisis, the former prime minister claims Britain being "out of Europe" and "little or no consultation" with the US over the military pullout shows the weakening of the UK's global standing.

Without mentioning Boris Johnson by name, he claims "parts of the right in politics" need to understand that isolation is self-defeating.

And in a defiant swipe at critics who claim he waged an illegal war in Iraq in 2003, he says "parts of the left" need to accept that intervention can sometimes be necessary.

His attacks - especially his reference to Brexit - may delight his supporters but will infuriate critics who will claim his record on Iraq and Afghanistan discredits him.

The hard-hitting assessment of the Taliban takeover by Mr Blair, who sent British troops into Afghanistan in 2001 when he was PM, comes in a lengthy article for the Institute for Global Change.

"The abandonment of Afghanistan and its people is tragic, dangerous, unnecessary, not in their interests and not in ours," the former leader writes.

"As the leader of our country when we took the decision to join America in removing the Taliban from power; [I] saw the high hopes we had of what we could achieve for the people and the world subside under the weight of bitter reality.

"I know better than most how difficult the decisions of leadership [are] and how easy it is to be critical and how hard [it is] to be constructive."

And in a scathing attack on President Joe Biden's abrupt withdrawal of US troops, he claims it is obvious that the decision to withdraw was not driven by a grand strategy but by politics.

"We didn't need to do it," Mr Blair writes. "We chose to do it. We did it in obedience to an imbecilic political slogan about ending 'the forever wars'.

"Russia, China and Iran will see and take advantage. Anyone given commitments by Western leaders will understandably regard them as unstable currency.

"We did it because our politics seemed to demand it. And that's the worry of our allies and the source of rejoicing in those who wish us ill. They think Western politics is broken."

In criticism aimed at Donald Trump as well as President Biden, Mr Blair claims "the deep politicisation of foreign policy and security issues" is weakening American power.

He adds: "And for Britain, out of Europe and suffering the end of the Afghanistan mission by our greatest ally with little or no consultation, we have serious reflection to do.

"We don't see it yet. But we are at risk of relegation to the second division of global powers. Maybe we don't mind. But we should at least take the decision deliberatively."

He adds: "If the West wants to shape the 21st century it will take commitment. Through thick and thin. When it's rough as well as easy. Making sure allies have confidence and opponents have caution.

"It will require parts of the right in politics to understand that isolation in an interconnected world is self-defeating; and parts of the left to accept that intervention can sometimes be necessary to uphold our values."

On what needs to happen now, Mr Blair writes: "We must evacuate and give sanctuary to those to whom we have responsibility - those Afghans who helped us and stood by us and have a right to demand we stand by them.

"There must be no repetition of arbitrary deadlines. We have a moral obligation to keep at it until all those who need to be are evacuated. And we should do so not grudgingly, but out of a deep sense of humanity and responsibility.

"We need then to work out a means of dealing with the Taliban and exerting maximum pressure on them. This is not as empty as it seems. We have given up much of our leverage, but we retain some.

"The Taliban will face very difficult decisions and likely divide deeply over them.

Follow the Daily podcast on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Spotify, Spreaker

"The country, its finances and its public sector workforce are significantly dependent on aid notably from the USA, Japan, the UK and others.

"The average age of the population is 18. A majority of Afghans have known freedom and not known the Taliban regime. They will not all conform quietly."

And turning to what Mr Johnson must do next, he adds: "The UK as the current G7 chair should convene a contact group of the G7 and other key nations and commit to coordinating help to the Afghan people and holding the new regime to account.

"NATO - which has had 8,000 troops still in Afghanistan alongside the USA and Europe - should be brought fully into cooperation under this grouping.

"We need to draw up a list of incentives, sanctions and actions we can take including to protect the civilian population so the Taliban understand their actions will have consequences. This is urgent."

Our goal is to create a safe and engaging place for users to connect over interests and passions. In order to improve our community experience, we are temporarily suspending article commenting