Controversial Swarland bungalows will not be built after new plans approved
Controversial plans for four bungalows in the Northumbrian village of Swarland will not go ahead after new proposals were given the green light.
The new planning application sought permission for two detached dwellings along with associated garages. The previous application for bungalows was approved in 2020 despite local concerns around access and visibility issues.
Speaking at Thursday's meeting of the North Northumberland Local Area Committee, planning agent Simon Beeby of Galbraith spoke in support of the application. He said the applicant was "keen to improve" on the previous application, having 'recognised its shortcomings'.
READ MORE: Plans for new Bedlington children's home approved despite objections from neighbours
READ MORE: Northumberland Line station opening delayed until the New Year
He added that the new scheme represented "high quality architecture" and pointed out there were no objections from statutory consultees including highways or the flood authority. Local ward councillor Trevor Thorne agreed that the application was an improvement.
He said: "Previously we had a development of four dwellings, we have now got two. This application has been worked on very well, reducing density, reducing height and improving the access.
"This development is set back from the road, unlike the bungalows which actually bordered it. Think this is much better than the previous one".
However, the plan had received objections from nine residents, while Newton On The Moor and Swarland Parish Council also submitted an objection. Residents' claimed the village had reached "saturation point" and the development would "affect the quality of life for existing residents".
The parish council raised concerns about the "overbearing" scale of the development as well as the "inadequate" access.
Both residents and the council also objected on the grounds of the impact on heritage assets, namely a wall previously belonging to the now demolished Swarland Hall. This was addressed by Coun Thorne.
He said: "The building was demolished last century, and all that remains is the two lodges and the wall. I think it isn't such an amazing historic asset."
The plans were unanimously approved by the committee.