French court rejects transgender woman’s demand to be recognised as a mother

·3-min read

France's highest court has ruled that a transgender woman cannot be officially recognised as the biological mother of the child she conceived with her wife before transitioning.

The court ruled on Wednesday that a 51-year old transgender woman, referred to in court as ‘Claire’, would have to adopt the six-year-old child in order to become one of its two legal mothers.

“My client is devastated […] this is a lost opportunity,” Clelia Richard, one of the lawyers, told Libération newspaper. “The justice system is rigid, immobile, as is often the case.”

Bastien Lachaud, MP with the hard-left France Unbowed party, described the decision as "unjust and incomprehensible" and called for the law to be completed to allow filiation for trans persons.

The case has now been referred back to a lower court for a new hearing.

A six-year legal battle

Claire was born male and had two children in 2000 and 2004 with his wife. In 2011 Claire was officially registered as female.

Three years later, while she still had male reproductive organs, the couple had a third child, a girl.

Since then, she has fought a legal battle to be recognised as the child’s second mother, not father.

French law has no provision for such cases but in 2018 an appeals court in the city of Montpellier, southern France, granted her the new, hybrid status of “biological parent”.

But on Wednesday the Cour de Cassation rejected that ruling, considering that “two maternal filiations cannot be established with regard to the same child, outside of adoption”.

“In sum, it amounts to telling my client: ‘either you adopt, or you are not her mother”, said Richard, describing the verdict as “scandalous”.

Step backwards

"The ruling is a considerable step backwards towards a concept of parenthood that was believed to be long buried," said lawyer Bertrand Périer representing the APGL association of gay and lesbian parents.

“It’s a way of taking trans people back to their original identity, through a very serious negation of their transition process and recognition of their gender.”

But for lawyer Anne-Marie Le Pourhiet, the Court decision was “reasonable”.

She said that had the courts accorded a male-born transgender person the legal civil status of a mother "it would have twisted the law on filiation”.

“To attribute two mothers to a child when one of them is, biologically speaking, its father, is to transform that child's personal history into fiction, in the name of adult desire," she told La Croix newspaper.

No rewriting the past

Ludivine de la Rochère, head of the La Manif pour Tous movement which opposed same-sex marriage and now campaigns against PMA (medically assisted procreation) and GPA (surrogacy), echoed similar concerns.

If 'Claire' was able to conceive a child with her partner, it's because she was a man, and therefore the father," she told CNews tv. "We cannot rewrite the past."

Fear of legal turmoil

For law professor Philippe Reigné “the court didn’t dare upturn the law on filiation, for fear it would lead to legal turmoil”.

“It sent a message to lawmakers that's it time to settle the question of filiation concerning trans persons following a change in their civil status.”

This grey area in French law will likely be discussed as part of the bioethics law which is due to go into a second reading at the Senate before the end of the year.

The new law could allow for lesbian couples to have double filiation on their childrens’ birth certificates.

Lawyers representing Claire said they were prepared to take the matter to the European Court of Human Rights.