The Guardian’s duty to inspire, amuse and anger
Libby Ruffle asks (Letters, 16 March) “does the Guardian carry a responsibility for mediation and reconciliation?” No, it doesn’t. It is a vehicle for reporting news and facilitating views and comment on that news. I read the Guardian for honest and accurate reportage but also to be stimulated, inspired, amused, angered and challenged by a range of overviews on that news. I am not interested in commentary that has been “mediated” so as not to frighten the horses.
• Correspondence concerning “necessaries”, “netties” etc (Letters, passim) reminds me of a cleric I knew who, when required, would declare that he needed to go “now even unto Bethlehem”; presumably to “see this thing which is come to pass.”
• Top ten breakup songs (G2, 15 March) without Without You by Harry Nilsson? I think not.
• I’m amazed that Jackson Browne’s heartrending Late for the Sky didn’t make it into Alexis Petridis’s breakup songs list.
Prestwich, Greater Manchester
• After Michael Cunningham (Letters, 16 March) and Wolves net two apiece, I bet there was one hell of a party in Wolverhampton on Saturday night.
Gordon Bennett, Llangollen canal
• How can we persuade you to include a codeword in the Saturday Guardian? It would be the cherry on the cake.
Kate and Nigel Gardner
• Join the debate – email firstname.lastname@example.org
• Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters
• Do you have a photo you’d like to share with Guardian readers? Click here to upload it and we’ll publish the best submissions in the letters spread of our print edition