HS2 trains could run slower and less regularly in an effort to cut costs, rail boss admits

The Birmingham and Fazeley viaduct, part of the proposed route for the HS2 high speed rail scheme (Picture: PA)
The Birmingham and Fazeley viaduct, part of the proposed route for the HS2 high speed rail scheme (Picture: PA)

Train services on the controversial new HS2 line could run slower and less regularly in a bid to cut costs, its chief executive has admitted.

Running slower and fewer trains on the line are among the options available to keep the rail project within budget, HS2 Ltd chief executive Mark Thurston said.

Phase 1 of the £56 billion high speed rail link will open between London and Birmingham in December 2026 before the railway is extended to Crewe, Manchester and Leeds.

HS2 trains are designed to operate at up to 225mph and also serve locations on the existing mainline network, such as Liverpool, Newcastle, Edinburgh and Glasgow.

Many areas have protested against HS2 (Picture: PA)
Many areas have protested against HS2 (Picture: PA)

But at a meeting with MPs, Mr Thurston said train speeds and frequency could be changed in an effort to reduce cost.

Details of the meeting of the All-Party Parliamentary Rail Group in November were revealed in a letter from Leader of the Commons Andrea Leadsom to Mr Thurston in which she raised concerns about the “viability” of the project.

MORE: Theresa May warns of ‘unforgivable breach of trust’ if MPs don’t vote for her Brexit deal
MORE: Donald Trump’s behaviour ‘so concerning FBI opened Russia collusion inquiry’

She wrote: “My parliamentary assistant, who attended on my behalf, tells me that you informed the APPG that, ahead of the review of the business case for HS2 next year, a number of changes to the project may have to be considered in order to keep it within budget and on time – something my colleague the secretary of state for transport has made clear is imperative.”

Ms Leadsom said options discussed included possibly lowering train speeds by about 30mph, reducing train numbers from 18 to 14 per hour, and changing from a slab to a ballast track.

The MP for South Northamptonshire, an area through which the proposed HS2 route will run, wrote: “My constituents are naturally concerned that changes to the project could undermine the business case, negatively affect the benefit-cost ratio, and reduce the value for taxpayers’ money.”

She asked for an assurance that the project could be delivered “on time and on budget without impacting the business case or affecting the basis upon which it was agreed by Parliament”.

In a written response to Ms Leadsom published on her website, Mr Thurston, who leads the company responsible for developing and promoting the UK’s new high speed rail network, said it was ensuring the project was “on time and within budget”.

He said Ms Leadsom had “correctly” referred to a number of options he set out when asked at the APPG meeting what could be done to change the scope of HS2 to reduce cost.

The former boss of HS2 said the early cost estimate for the project was “enormously wrong” (Picture: HS2)
The former boss of HS2 said the early cost estimate for the project was “enormously wrong” (Picture: HS2)

He added: “However, I was also clear that HS2 Ltd is working to the scope and budget of the project which the government has set, and for which detailed debate in Parliament has taken place.

“If at some point in the future we are instructed to consider any of these options, then more detailed work on the effect of such changes would of course take place.

“I can assure you that any impact on communities and the findings within the Environmental Statement would be fully investigated and discussed.”

A spokesman for HS2 Ltd declined to comment on Sunday.

Last month, former HS2 boss Doug Thornton said MPs’ early cost estimate for the controversial rail project was “enormously wrong”.

He told BBC’s Panorama programme that the costing underestimated the value of properties along the proposed HS2 route and that thousands more had not been budgeted for.

He said the figure MPs were given was hundreds of millions of pounds too low. Mr Thornton was later sacked from his job. HS2 has rejected claims that MPs were misled.

Our goal is to create a safe and engaging place for users to connect over interests and passions. In order to improve our community experience, we are temporarily suspending article commenting