Jeremy Corbyn refuses four times to describe Iranian General Qassem Soleimani as a 'terrorist'

Jeremy Corbyn has refused to describe assassinated Iranian General Qassem Soleimani as a “terrorist”.

The Labour leader was asked whether he believed that Soleimani had engaged in acts of terrorism before he was killed in a US air strike last week.

Speaking to Sky News, Mr Corbyn was given four opportunities to label Soleimani a terrorist – but refused to do so on each occasion.

When asked why Soleimani was in Iraq, Mr Corbyn said: “He was in Iraq, for reasons of contact, I assume, with the Iraqi government – I've no idea what his actual meetings were.

Britain's opposition Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn leaves his home in north London on  December 17, 2019 for the first full day of the new parliament following the general election. - Corbyn will face Prime Minister Boris Johnson in the House of Commons today after Labour was handed its worst defeat in a general election since World war II, forcing the Labour leader to announce a plan for his departure. He also faces a potentially uncomfortable meeting with his own Labour colleagues later in the day. (Photo by Tolga AKMEN / AFP) (Photo by TOLGA AKMEN/AFP via Getty Images)
Jeremy Corbyn asked by Sky News if he considered General Qassem Soleimani a terrorist. (Getty)
Millions mourners pay homage to assassinated Iranian Major Geneneral Soleimani in US Airstrike. The Pentagon announced that Iran's Quds Force leader Qassem Soleimani and Iraqi militia commander Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis were killed on 03 January 2020 following a US airstrike at Baghdad's international airport. (Photo by Mazyar Asadi/Pacific Press/Sipa USA)
Mourners pay homage to General Soleimani. (PA)

“All I'm saying is that to assassinate an official of a foreign government in a third country, in this case Iraq, is illegal under any law and the US – if it wants the world to stand by international law – must stand by international law itself.”

Asked again if he accepted that Soleimani was a terrorist, Mr Corbyn responded: “I'm not here to defend the special forces of Iran, I'm not here to defend any of those actions that have happened or been planned for the future.”

Mr Corbyn was then asked if he agreed with Boris Johnson’s assessment that Soleimani was a terrorist, and responded by criticising the prime minister for not appearing in Parliament on Tuesday to answer questions about the incident.

Read more from Yahoo News UK:

Boris Johnson warns Donald Trump against 'disproportionate' strikes on Iran

Stampede at funeral procession for Soleimani leaves 56 dead and over 200 injured

What the Iran crisis could mean for UK petrol prices

On the fourth question, which directly asked if Soleimani was a terrorist, Mr Corbyn said: “Soleimani is the head of special forces of Iran. They obviously operate in all kinds of places that you or I would not agree with or want. That is not the point.”

Mr Corbyn has described the US assassination of Soleimani as “illegal” and wrote to Mr Johnson to demand answers.

The outgoing Labour leader has previously been criticised for being paid to appear on Iran’s state television broadcaster Press TV.

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn during the debate on the House of Commons, London, on the Queen's Speech. (Photo by House of Commons/PA Images via Getty Images)
Jeremy Corbyn described the killing of General Soleimani as 'illegal'. (Getty)
In this image made from a video, mourners gather to pay their respects to the slain Gen. Qassem Soleimani who was killed in a U.S. airstrike, in Kerman, Iran Tuesday, Jan. 7, 2020. (Iran Press via AP)
The Labour leader was asked whether he believed General Soleimani had engaged in acts of terrorism. (AP)

He was met with laughter as he told MPs on Tuesday that he had “long spoken out against the Iranian government's human rights record”.

Mr Corbyn said the killing of Soleimani – that has resulted in Iran firing rockets at bases in Iraq housing US troops – was “an extremely dangerous and aggressive act that risks starting yet another deadly war in the Middle East”.

The US has insisted the strike was justified on the grounds of self-defence.