Julian Assange: ‘Suicide risk’ should not block trial, US says as extradition hearing begins

  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
·4-min read
In this article:
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
Stella Moris, the partner of Julian Assange, speaks to the media as she arrives at the High Court (PA)
Stella Moris, the partner of Julian Assange, speaks to the media as she arrives at the High Court (PA)

Supporters of Julian Assange gathered outside the High Court as the US began its bid to overturn a decision not to grant his extradition on spying charges.

Signs saying “no extradition”, “truth” and “free Julian Assange” were accompanied by loud music and chants near the steps leading up to the court in central London on Wednesday as the two-day hearing began.

Assange, 50, is wanted in the US on allegations of a conspiracy to obtain and disclose national defence information following WikiLeaks’ publication of hundreds of thousands of leaked documents relating to the Afghanistan and Iraq wars.

The Australian initially indicated he would not be appearing in court via video-link from Belmarsh Prison, where he has been since 2019, but later appeared partly off-screen wearing a black face covering, white shirt and dark tie as he observed the hearing.

Both the main court and an overflow court at the Royal Courts of Justice were completely full as media and members of the public gathered to watch the first day of proceedings.

In January, District Judge Vanessa Baraitser ruled Assange should not be sent to the US, citing a real risk of suicide. The judge concluded there was a real risk he would be submitted to “special administrative measures” and detained at the ADX Florence Supermax jail - a maximum security prison near Colorado - if extradited.

Bu the US has since provided assurances, including that it would consent to him being transferred to Australia to serve any prison sentence he may be given.

James Lewis QC, representing the US Court of Appeal, on Wednesday argued the district judge “entirely based her decision” on the risk Assange would be submitted to special administrative measures and detained at the ADX Florence Supermax jail, if extradited.

He said the assurances over Assange’s treatment meant District Judge Vanessa Baraitser should have ruled in favour of his extradition.

Supporters of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange demonstrate outside the Royal Courts of Justice in London (Andy Rain/EPA)
Supporters of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange demonstrate outside the Royal Courts of Justice in London (Andy Rain/EPA)

The US authorities have also argued Assange is well enough to be extradited, with Mr Lewis telling the court his mental illness “does not even come close” to being severe enough to prevent being sent to the US.

Mr Lewis told the court Ms Baraitser based her decision on Assange’s “intellectual ability to circumvent suicide preventative measures”, which risked becoming a “trump card” for anyone who wanted to oppose their extradition regardless of any resources the other state might have”.

“The district judge’s approach carries with it the risk of rewarding fugitives for their flight, and of creating an anomaly between the approach of the courts in domestic criminal proceedings and in extradition,” he said.

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange (AFP via Getty Images)
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange (AFP via Getty Images)

“In the domestic context, it would never be said that an individual accused of crimes of the severity of Mr Assange’s could not be put on trial, despite being fit to be tried, because of his determination to commit suicide.”

Edward Fitzgerald QC, for Assange, told the court in written arguments that the US authorities had “sought to minimise the severity of Mr Assange’s mental disorder and suicide risk”.

He continued: “It is perfectly reasonable to find it oppressive to extradite a mentally disordered person because his extradition is likely to result in his death.”

He added the assurance that Assange could be transferred to a prison in Australia if convicted was “meaningless”, adding that Assange “will most likely be dead before it can have any purchase, if it ever could”

Assange has been held in Belmarsh Prison since 2019 after he was carried out of the Ecuadorian embassy in London by police before being arrested for breaching his bail conditions.

He had entered the building in 2012 to avoid extradition to Sweden to face sex offence allegations, which he has always denied and were eventually dropped.

Assange’s partner Stella Moris and father John Shipton were among the supporters who travelled to the court for the hearing on Wednesday.

Ms Moris said she was “very concerned” for Assange’s health, telling reporters: “I saw him on Saturday, he’s very thin.”

She added: “I hope the courts will end this nightmare, that Julian is able to come home soon and that wise heads prevail.”

Supporters were also seen setting up a marquee outside the court.

Among them was Nicholas Rainer, 26, from Barking, east London, who said: “Any time Julian is in court I’m here as well. They keep trying to silence him and that means they’re trying to silence us.

“He should be free - there’s no reason for this to keep happening. Hopefully the court will do the right thing.”

The hearing is expected to end on Thursday with a decision at a later date.

Additional reporting by Press Association

Read More

‘I was taken aback by how thin he was’: Julian Assange ‘sick and very unwell’ as he fights extradition to US

House Intelligence Committee seeks information on alleged Trump-era plot to kidnap Julian Assange

Trump denies report he considered assassinating Julian Assange

The CIA plot to kidnap or kill Julian Assange in London is a story that is being mistakenly ignored

Our goal is to create a safe and engaging place for users to connect over interests and passions. In order to improve our community experience, we are temporarily suspending article commenting