Lough Neagh recovery plan will involve “hurt and pain”, MLA warns
The recovery of Lough Neagh will inevitably involve “hurt and pain” for sectors which have contributed to the environmental crisis impacting its water, an MLA has warned.
Alliance Party MLA John Blair said while there were no quick fixes to issues at the lough, the fastest route to recovery was to stop pollutants and toxins flowing into the water.
Senior civil servants briefed Stormont ’s Committee for Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs on the Lough Neagh action plan, which was recently agreed by the Executive. The action plan was developed in an attempt to deal with the various environmental issues at the lough and contains 37 proposals.
Read more: PSNI accused of 'disproportionately policing' environmental protesters
Read more: Programme for Government doesn't include an independent EPA
Noxious blooms of blue-green algae covered large parts of the lough during the past two summers and also affected other waterways and beaches in the region.
Lough Neagh, the biggest freshwater lake by surface area in the UK and Ireland, supplies 40% of Northern Ireland’s drinking water and sustains a major eel-fishing industry.
Nitrogen and phosphorus from agricultural fertiliser running off fields and from wastewater treatment is a contributory factor in the blue-green algae blooms.
The spread of the invasive zebra mussel species is also understood to have played a role in the blooms, as they have made the water clearer, allowing more sunlight to penetrate, stimulating more algal photosynthesis. Climate change is another factor cited, with rising water temperatures.
Rory O’Boyle, deputy director of the natural environment policy division at the Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs (Daera), told the committee the action plan was not a wish-list.
He said: “It is a detailed, science-led, proportionate and ambitious set of actions that we feel can make a tangible difference to our waterways. But in this scenario there will be no quick fixes. This will be a long process … it could take 20, 30, 40 years, we don’t really know.”
He added: “The main focus as an action plan is to address the main cause of the blue-green algae blooms which is emanating from phosphorous from agriculture and some wastewater treatment works, effluent getting into our waterways. Our interventions need really to focus on this.”
He said the action plan would also tackle biodiversity issues at the lough.
He said: “It is not the main focus of this report but it is very clear that we need to look at robust conservation measures to try and restore the ecological resilience of the lough itself. That will play an integral part in the health of the lough.”
Mr O’Boyle said the department had this week appointed a new head of the Lough Neagh delivery governance team to take the action plan forward.
Mr Blair said: “When you have a lough with the problems that have been so clearly identified and you know that the levels of phosphorates are seven times what they should be and the levels of nitrates are one-and-a-half times what they should be, and then you have to add to that wastewater treatment issues and the lack of investment and the septic tank problem as well.
“In the context of quick fixes, isn’t the quick fix really the quicker you stop those levels of pollutants and toxins flowing into that lough, then the quicker you fix the problem. Isn’t that really the crux of this?”
Dr Alistair Carson, chief scientific adviser at Daera, said nutrient pollution was the “core issue” at the lough.
He added: “That is why the core of the report is the catchment management. While dealing with lake management options, that is not dealing with the core issue, that is just trying to manage the position. It shouldn’t dilute from the focus of dealing with the core issue itself.
“I don’t think the timescales involved in full recovery should deter us from really moving ahead and the implementation of the actions.
“Dealing with the loss of the nutrients into the water bodies will have shorter-term benefits in the aquatic environment with streams and rivers flowing into the lough. Those benefits will come through more quickly and will start the road to recovery for the lough’s ecology.”
Mr Blair said people would be frustrated at the speed of progress in dealing with issues at the lough.
He added: “Don’t please fool ourselves that there won’t be some hurt and some pain along the way for some people and some sectors, and all of those involved in contributing to the effects in Lough Neagh will have to do something to put that right, however long that takes.”
The Alliance MLA also raised concern that the Executive has still not approved Northern Ireland’s first environment strategy.
The UK’s environmental watchdog, the Office for Environmental Protection, is investigating the department over the failure to implement an environmental improvement plan.
Environment Minister Andrew Muir said this week he is continuing to engage with ministerial colleagues in the hope of getting the strategy agreed.
Mr Blair told the committee: “I think it is probably fair to put the marker down here today that if we don’t see some progress on that soon at the Northern Ireland Executive then we probably need to write as a committee.
“This will be a test of the shoulders that need to go to the wheels on the environment improvement plan, the environment in general and Lough Neagh in particular in the months and years ahead.”
For all the latest news, visit the Belfast Live homepage here and sign up to our daily newsletter here.