The police must not be censors – it’s time to scrap NCHIs for good

Metropolitan Police badge
Metropolitan Police badge

The Test Act of 1672 required individuals to pledge allegiance to the Church of England before enjoying liberties. Those who refused were excluded from public life, barred from universities and relegated to society’s margins. This draconian system is a relic of history, but echoes of its spirit persist in 21st-century Britain.

Today, the modern equivalent is ideological conformity under the guise of tolerance – enforced not by bishops but by police officers and bureaucrats logging non-crime hate incidents (NCHIs).

These records, designed to monitor “hostility” that falls short of a crime, reflect a warped understanding of inclusion. The existence of NCHIs has created a dangerous precedent: that expressing a view, even in good faith, can lead to a police record if someone, somewhere, decides to take offence. Journalists, politicians and children have all been caught.

The parallels between the Test Act and NCHIs are striking. In the 17th century, dissenters who refused to sign articles of faith were punished. Now, those who dare challenge today’s creed of open borders, gender ideology, or pro-Palestine activism face ostracism, reputational damage, and potentially – through NCHIs – state-sanctioned monitoring.

NCHI reports can follow individuals for years, showing up on background checks for jobs. Consider the absurdity of that: a person could lose a career chance over something that isn’t classified as a crime. The tools may differ from the 17th century, but the effect is the same: coerced conformity.

This has a chilling effect on public discourse. When people fear that expressing an opinion might land them on a police database, they become less willing to engage in open debate. That fear, though subtle, gnaws at the fabric of a democracy built on the contest of ideas. The result is a homogenised culture where dissenting views are stifled not by force, but by the quiet terror of surveillance

This was demonstrated in the case of Harry Miller in 2021, a former police officer investigated for tweeting gender-critical views. Though breaking no laws, Miller was subjected to a visit from the police, who wanted to “check his thinking”. His tweets were recorded as a non-crime hate incident because someone perceived them as transphobic.

The Court of Appeal ruled that police intervention was unlawful, stating that the guidance on NCHIs undermined freedom of expression. The judgment underscored what should have been obvious: policing speech that does not meet the criminal threshold erodes our freedoms. Yet the practice persists.

NCHIs originated in the aftermath of the Macpherson Report following the murder of Stephen Lawrence. The aim was to capture incidents of racism and ensure that victims felt heard. Over time, this measure expanded to include all protected characteristics under the Equality Act; the threshold for recording an incident became dangerously low: if someone perceived hostility, it could be logged – no evidence required.

But the reality is that the subjective nature of NCHIs makes them unworkable. By elevating hurt feelings to the status of quasi-law, we risk creating a society ruled by the tyranny of the most easily offended. This asymmetry corrodes trust in policing and creates a perception that the system is rigged.

When I became home secretary, I was determined to tackle this misuse of police powers. Building on the Court of Appeal’s judgment in the Miller case, I introduced new statutory guidance in 2023. This raised the threshold for recording NCHIs, making it clear that free speech is a cornerstone of British society. But these changes did not go as far as I would have liked.

Police forces have largely ignored the guidance, and the culture of policing thought remains entrenched. Stronger action is needed.

The resources diverted to monitoring online spats are preposterous. Since 2014, police forces in England and Wales have recorded more than 250,000 NCHIs – an average of 66 per day. Pretty much all police chiefs I spoke to as home secretary demanded more funding and officers. We delivered. But what is the point of increasing police numbers if they are busy chasing tweets instead of criminals? It cannot be right that the police solve fewer burglaries than ever before while racking up a record number of NCHIs.

This distortion reflects the cultural capture of policing by ideological zeal. Within some police forces, NCHIs are treated as a holy writ of the modern religion of virtue-signalling. Officers are trained to act as moral arbiters, not crime fighters. This has led to the grotesque spectacle of police investigating writers Allison Pearson and Julie Bindel for expressing opinions.

The rationale behind NCHIs is couched in the language of safeguarding and inclusion, but the practice is rooted in coercion. NCHIs have been a costly distraction from the real priorities of law enforcement. This is not justice, it is bureaucracy gone mad, and has no place in the 21st century.

If we are serious about restoring trust in the police and safeguarding liberty, it is time to scrap them.


Rt Hon Suella Braverman MP served as home secretary