Advertisement

Richard Branson uses CCTV footage to accuse Jeremy Corbyn of dishonesty over his 'ram-packed' Virgin train ride

Jeremy Corbyn Virgin train
Jeremy Corbyn Virgin train

Twitter / @richardbranson

Virgin Trains has released an extraordinary response to Jeremy Corbyn's claim that he was forced to sit on the floor of one of its London to Newcastle services because there were no seats left.

A clip, which was first published by the Guardian last week, appeared to show the Labour leader sat on the floor of the train during the three-hour journey.

The video was shared by his campaign team to raise awareness of his policy to renationalise Britain's railways and tackle the problem of over-crowded services for commuters.

However, on Tuesday, the Richard Branson-owned company put out a press release which challenges Corbyn's claim that there was nowhere to sit on the train. The Telegraph, which said it had seen the footage too, also published a story supporting this.

Virgin also published screenshots from the CCTV footage recorded on the day, which appears to show Corbyn walking past empty, unreserved seats prior to sitting on the floor, and then taking a seat on coach H once the filming was done.

 In the statement, Virgin Trains says:

"Film footage released to the media showed Mr Corbyn sitting on the floor of a three-hour Virgin Trains service from London to Newcastle claiming it was 'ram-packed.'

"CCTV footage taken from the train on August 11 shows Mr Corbyn and his team walked past empty, unreserved seats in coach H before walking through the rest of the train to the far end, where his team sat on the floor and started filming.

Corbyn Virgin
Corbyn Virgin

Twitter / @richardbranson

"The same footage then shows Mr Corbyn returning to coach H and taking a seat there, with the help of the onboard crew, around 45 minutes into the journey and over two hours before the train reached Newcastle. Mr Corbyn’s team carried out their filming around 30 minutes into the journey.

"There were also additional empty seats on the train (the 11am departure from King’s Cross) which appear from CCTV to have been reserved but not taken, so they were also available for other passengers to sit on."

Branson himself then weighed into the debate, tweeting a picture of Corbyn walking past empty seats as he boarded the service. 

Tweet Embed:
https://twitter.com/mims/statuses/768070742135152640
Mr Corbyn & team walked past empty unreserved seats then filmed claim train was ‘ram-packed’ https://t.co/R5hawIpQek pic.twitter.com/22t8EkjW5l

Shortly after Virgin released the statement, Corbyn's leadership rival published a tweet which appeared to take a subtle dig at the current Labour leader.

Tweet Embed:
https://twitter.com/mims/statuses/768080688616730624
I'd quite like to see what happens when you get @OwenSmith_MP's ordinary people and @david_cameron's hard working people in the same room.

 In a statement emailed to Business Insider, a spokesperson for Corbyn said:

"When Jeremy boarded the train he was unable to find unreserved seats, so he sat with other passengers in the corridor who were also unable to find a seat. 

"Later in the journey, seats became available after a family were upgraded to first class, and Jeremy and the team he was travelling with were offered the seats by a very helpful member of staff.

"Passengers across Britain will have been in similar situations on overcrowded, expensive trains. That is why our policy to bring the trains back into public ownership, as part of a plan to rebuild and transform Britain, is so popular with passengers and rail workers."

His team then released this new footage of Corbyn walking through a busy carriage.

Tweet Embed:
https://twitter.com/mims/statuses/768120941977096193
Our response to supposed #traingate - watch and read - https://t.co/myPJSo1oeAhttps://t.co/Mk3P0lrjjl

NOW WATCH: Here's what Louise Mensch really thinks of Jeremy Corbyn

See Also:

SEE ALSO: This chart proves that Jeremy Corbyn's awful approval ratings matter — a lot

DON'T MISS: We spoke to the woman whose landmark legal case could block government from triggering Article 50