Advertisement

What UK stands to lose if Airbus pulls out the country

An Airbus A350 XWB.
An Airbus A350 XWB. Airbus has warned it could pull out of Britain if it leaves the European Union without a deal. Photograph: Adrian Dennis/AFP/Getty Images

Aditya Chakrabortty (Who will buy our plane when Airbus is gone, 23 June) underestimates the depth of our national investment in Airbus. The UK government made its first steps in developing the core wing technology in the early 1950s. With Hawker Siddeley Aviation, later part of British Aerospace, we joined the Airbus programme in 1967. In 1970, the Labour government officially left the programme, leaving Hawker Siddeley to negotiate a private contract to build the first sets of wings.

Rejoining in 1978, with newly nationalised British Aerospace defying a governmental consensus in favour of working with the US, the UK began to benefit from a market breakthrough that would eventually repay several billion pounds of public investment in wing development. British Aerospace went on to sell its share in Airbus, leaving the UK without a national role in decision-making. Although French and German public ownership is now much diluted, we have effectively lost any strategic influence over the programme. Looking to the future, the opportunity costs of moving wing production out of Britain were hitherto high: the balance of cost-benefit is now on the verge of a substantial change. We will not feel the effects of disinvestment in the short term, but in the scope of aerospace development and manufacturing measured in decades, we could be watching the loss of over half a century’s massive public-private investment.
Professor Keith Hayward
Fellow of the Royal Aeronautical Society and the French Air and Space Academy, London

• It’s all very well for European businesses such as Airbus and BMW to harangue the government for a decision on Brexit, but it should also urge constructive negotiation from the EU. The government has said what it wants and the EU has said no. The EU should be asked for clarity about what it would offer instead.
David Fisher
Manchester

• Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com

• Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters