Darwin's Lost Fossils Found In Desk Drawer

'A' You said DNA provides no evidence? So here we go again.The earliest human ancestor was a Shrew-sized creature that lived among the dinosaurs was the forerunner to mammals and eventuallly humans.''Juramaia Sinensis'' which means Jurassic mother, The fossil includes a preserved set of teeth and forepaw bones, that scientists believed were closer to the anatomy of Placental mammals than Marsupials, it likely used its claws to scurry up trees and its teeth to eat insects,an existence that would have allowed it to endure and elude larger predators.

The finding corroborates DNA studies,conducted using Molecular evidence,which also suggested that the evolutionary split occured about 160 million years ago.

One day a 6 year old girl was sitting in a classroom. The teacher was going to explain evolution to the children. The teacher asked a little boy: Tommy do you see the tree outside? 
TOMMY: Yes. 
TEACHER: Tommy, do you see the grass outside? 
TOMMY: Yes. 
TEACHER: Go outside and look up and see if you can see the sky. 
TOMMY: Okay. (He returned a few minutes later) Yes, I saw the sky. 
TEACHER: Did you see God up there? 
TOMMY: No. 
TEACHER: That's my point. We can't see God because he isn't there.
Possibly he just doesn't exist.
 


A little girl spoke up and wanted to ask the boy some questions.  The teacher agreed and
the little girl asked the boy: Tommy, do you see the tree outside? 
TOMMY: Yes. 
LITTLE GIRL: Tommy do you see the grass outside? 
TOMMY: Yessssss! 
LITTLE GIRL: Did you see the sky? 
TOMMY: Yessssss! 
LITTLE GIRL: Tommy, do you see the teacher? 
TOMMY: Yes 
LITTLE GIRL: Do you see her brain? 
TOMMY: No 
LITTLE GIRL: Then according to what we were taught today in school, she possibly may not even have one!

(You Go Girl!) 

"FOR WE WALK BY FAITH, NOT BY SIGHT"
II CORINTHIANS 5:7 


What if there were billions of big bangs, each yielding its own separate, expanding universe? Our universe would then be a single expanding bubble inhabiting a grand cosmic bubble bath of Universes, is there a separate God for each universe? 'A'

G00gle: To find out why things happen in the physical world, you have to "follow the heat."

"Every step in the snowflake life-cycle obeys the laws of thermodynamics. Heat is neither created nor destroyed. Heat flows from a hot place to a cold place. Heat becomes less well organized because it is more evenly distributed throughout the universe as cool places warm up, and warm places cool down. Snowflakes don’t violate the laws of thermodynamics. There is nothing miraculous about it.

"Mineral crystals form for the same reason snow crystals form. Heat is released as minerals in solution form solid crystals, equalizing the temperature all around, increasing entropy.

"So, evolutionists who claim that snowflakes and mineral crystals decrease entropy, proving evolution can happen, are wrong on two counts. First, they are wrong because entropy of the crystal and the environment around the crystal actually increases, in accordance with the Second Law. Second, the formation of crystals has absolutely nothing to do with the origin of life, or the information in the DNA molecule. The Second Law of thermodynamics really does explain why life, and DNA molecules, cannot form spontaneously."

Im sure 'A' know's the Superstition? All windows should be opened at the moment of Death so that the soul can leave the body.

Years ago, Carl Sagan emphasized that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. so where's your God 'A' or the Ark?

A n y b o d y -
1 ) D o t h e v a r i a t i o n s i n t h e g e n o m e o f t h e d r o s o p h i l a m e l a n o g a s t e r c o d e f o r b o t h m i c r o e v o l u t i o n a n d m a c r o e v o l u t i o n ?
2 ) D o t h e v a r i a t i o n s i n t h e g e n o m e f o r a n y l i v i n g o r g a n i s m e v e r c o d e f o r m a c r o e v o l u t i o n ?

'A' I guess you gave up on the number 13.024, i dont know how, you can get 5 mass extinctions in that amount of time.

i Think 'A' Wants to be the last man standing, like that bruce willis movie? it will just be 'A' and his bible Hymn's.

According to the math of thermodynamics, the natural origination of Complex Specified Information is impossible. DNA is an example of Complex Specified Information which is mathematically impossible to "evolve."

My favorite comment from URBT.
The good old biblical god who created 200 billion galaxies each with 200 billion stars and an unimaginable number of planets decides to commission a little handbook to tell earth-bound higher primates how to treat their slaves and livestock,puts it all in context?

'A' Out of 200 billion galaxies, do you see how ridiculous that sounds 'A' its ludicrous.

False Attributes to Thermodynamics, Creationists have created a ''Voodoo'' thermodynamics based solely on metaphors in order to convince those not familiar with real thermodynamics that their sectarian religious views have Scientific validity, so its a way for you 'A' to twist well established Scientific principles into meaningless B/S
Get back to Charles Darwin on the Origin of Species,

Dr. Richard Lewontin, the Alexander Agassiz Professor of Zoology at Harvard University, put it like this: "It is not that the methods and institutions of science somehow compel us to accept a material explanation of the phenomenal world, but, on the contrary, that we are forced by our a priori adherence to material causes to create an apparatus of investigation and a set of concepts that produce material explanations, no matter how counterintuitive, no matter how mystifying to the uninitiated. Moreover, that materialism is absolute, for we cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door" (Richard Lewontin, "Billions and Billions of Demons," New York Review of Books, January 9, 1997, p. 28).
-AllAboutPhilosophydotOrg

sorry guys, i've been gone a few days? i had to buy a new modem, i hope no one, has a bone to pick with me? i need to keep my friends,

Over incredible lengths of time, the laws of thermodynamics wobble, and, naturally, anything is possible.

In the beginning there were small numerals: ⁰ ¹ ² ³ ⁴ ⁵ ⁶ ⁷ ⁸ ⁹.

Small numbers evolved into big numerals: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9.

Evolutionists are waiting for numerals to evolve in such a way that the blind clock maker's toy runs in reverse. (Time running backwards is one of the two ways in which entropy can decrease.)

If an evolutionology mathematical wizard such as Simon can ever prove that time ran backwards (during the great imaginary periods of punctuated equilibrium, for example), then I'll award him gold star.

'A' in the Philosophy of religion, Occam's razor is sometimes applied to the existence of God, if the concept of a God does not help to explain the Universe better, Then the idea is that atheism should be preferred.

instead of the 150 -year legacy of Charles Darwin on the Origin of Species by means of natural selection. we will let you 'A' provide your evidence of evolution to the Scientific Community, and see if it holds any water?

Evolutionism is NOT science. Don't expect any laws of nature to give credit to evolutionism.

Microevolution, Macroevolution and Species
With the discovery of DNA in 1953 scientists now had the necessary tools to
formally define three key terms, "microevolution," "macroevolution" and
"species."
"Macroevolution" is true evolution, which is what this book is all about.
"Macroevolution" means that each "species," by definition, has a unique DNA
structure, different than the DNA structure of any other "species" on the planet
earth.
"DNA structure" means all animals in that "species" have the same type and
number of genes, the same "morphing of the embryo" algorithms (to be
discussed later), etc.
In other words, the very definition of a "species" means that the species has
unique DNA, different than the DNA of all other species on the planet earth.
Thus, if evolution is true, then one "species," which has unique DNA, can
"evolve" into a different "species" which, by definition, has its own unique DNA
structure, meaning its DNA structure is different than its "parent" species.
The term "macroevolution" and "species" must both refer to a unique DNA
structure. Evolution claims unique DNA structures can "evolve" from a "parent
species" into a new DNA structure for the "child species."
However, there is zero scientific evidence that macroevolution has ever occurred
on this planet or any other planet.
"Microevolution," on the other hand, is simply variety within species, such as two
horses with different colors or two different breeds of guinea pigs.
Two horses can have exactly the same DNA structure, but have different
nucleotides in the same locations; yielding horses of different colors and/or
different heights, etc. This is microevolution.
The term "evolution" and the term "macroevolution" should mean exactly the
same thing because "microevolution" does not create any new species (i.e. any
new DNA structures).
"Evolution" is all about creating new DNA structures for new species (assuming
the term "species" refers to a unique DNA structure). Thus, "evolution" and
"macroevolution" mean exactly the same thing.
--Mathematics of Evolution