Brain size of mammals 'not linked to intelligence'

The relative size of a mammals brain is not linked to intelligence, but the need to increase their body mass to match their changing climate or habitat, research suggests.

An international team of scientists analysed data from 1,400 living and extinct mammal species to piece together a timeline of how brain and body size evolved over the last 150 million years.

There are "lots of different ways that species end up with big brains", according to the researchers, such as decreasing body size to suit a new habitat, climate or way of moving.

Conversely, the study indicated that the California sea lion's body increased in size at a faster rate than its brain as it diversified to a semi-aquatic niche, leaving it with a smaller relative brain size.

Most changes happened after the mass extinction event 66 million years ago, which led to the demise of the dinosaurs, and after a cooling event 30 million years later, according to the research.

After the mass extinction event there was a dramatic shift in relative brain-body size in lineages such as rodents, bats and a group of mammals known as carnivorans - which includes modern-day foxes, wolves, cougars and leopards.

The cooling climate that came later led to more profound changes, with seals, bears, whales, and primates all undergoing evolutionary shifts in their brain and body size.

The likes of elephants and great apes evolved their extreme proportions after this climate change event.

Professor Anjali Goswami, research leader at London's Natural History Museum, said: "This study exemplifies the dangers of our own biases in interpreting the natural world.

"As big-brained humans, we have long assumed that differences in brain size across species was due to selection for big brains.”

She added that differences in relative brain size across species are often due to “selection on body size” and not “anything to do with brains at all”.

"The complexity of these patterns has forced us to completely shift our thinking on what drives the evolution of brain size and shows that there are lots of different ways that species end up with big brains,” she said.

Co-author Dr Jacob Dunn, associate professor in Evolutionary Biology at Anglia Ruskin University (ARU), added: "For decades, biologists have assumed that relative brain size is a reliable indicator of intelligence among species."

This research suggests experts need to be "more cautious when making assumptions about a species' cognitive ability from its relative brain size," he added.

"The relationship between brain size and body size is complex, and either or both can evolve to be bigger or smaller in response to different environmental challenges," he said.

Researchers from the University of Salford and University College London also contributed to the research, which is published in the journal Science Advances.