No, 38% Of Americans Probably Didn't Stop Drinking Corona Because Of Coronavirus

(Photo: Igor Golovniov/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images)

A buzzy statistic about Americans ditching Corona beer for fear of coronavirus doesn’t quite hold up under sober analysis.

On Friday morning, CNN tweeted that “38% of Americans wouldn’t buy Corona beer ‘under any circumstances’ because of the coronavirus” ― a claim that promptly went, well, viral. The poll, conducted by 5W Public Relations, saw coverage in multiple media outlets. 

Many Twitter users seemed delighted for an excuse to poke fun at the rest of the country for jumping to such a dubious presumption (the beer, of course, is in no way related to the virus). But the poll and the reaction to it present their own lessons in drawing tenuous conclusions.

“Clearly, a lot of Americans already think that their fellow citizens are stupid,” Yascha Mounk wrote at The Atlantic. “The real reason a fake finding could have spread so far so quickly is that it confirmed prejudices about the world that many have held all along.”

It’s certainly true that Corona beer has drawn a wave of negative associations based on the unfortunate coincidence of its name in a way that could plausibly shift consumer behavior. But what we know about the survey driving the story falls far short of backing up the more far-reaching claims.

The press release touting the poll offers little detail on what, exactly, people were asked, and 5W Public Relations has not been immediately forthcoming in answering additional questions. The firm provided a list of the questions it asked to Mounk and to the conservative site The Dispatch but refused to provide exact results for each question. 5WPR did not respond to HuffPost’s requests to provide a list of the survey’s questions, answer choices and results.

Here are the questions that were asked, according to The Dispatch’s Declan Garvey, combined with the results 5WPR chose to include in its press release:

  • Are you a beer drinker?

  • Are you a Corona drinker?

  • Is Corona related to the coronavirus? (16% of beer-drinkers were “confused” about this.)

  • In light of the coronavirus, do you plan to stop drinking Corona? (4% who “usually drink Corona” said they planned to stop.)

  • Would you buy Corona in a store?

  • Would you order a Corona in a restaurant/bar/public venue? (14% who “usually drink Corona” said they would not.)

  • Would you buy Corona under any circumstances now? (38% of “beer-drinking Americans” said they would not.)

There are any number of ways a careful market researcher might attempt to tease out how, if at all, coronavirus has affected perceptions of the beer. This isn’t one of them. Instead, these questions manage to fail simultaneously in two different directions. On one hand, some of the phrasing (“In light of the coronavirus...”) implies a queasy connection between the virus and the beer that people might not have considered until they were polled.

On the other hand, the final three questions ― including the one responsible for that startling 38% statistic ― don’t explicitly mention coronavirus as a motivation at all. In other words, drinkers who said they wouldn’t buy Corona might simply have meant that they prefer to order a different brand of beer.

The much less eye-catching but entirely more plausible statistic is that, even “in light of the coronavirus,” just 4% of Americans who “usually drink Corona” say they “plan to stop” drinking it. Even here, the framing of the question is sloppy: If respondents “plan to stop,” doesn’t that imply they haven’t given it up yet?

Beyond the lack of clarity on the questionnaire, the press release is also somewhat vague about how the poll was conducted. According to 5WPR, it was run “via phone” and surveyed “737 American beer drinkers over the age of 21 on February 25 & 26, 2020.” Nothing about that description raises immediate red flags, and it’s a generally acceptable sample size for a national survey. But it falls short of answering a number of basic methodological questions, including whether the poll used live interviewers or robocalls, how it identified respondents and how it was weighted. Because of that lack of detail, we also don’t know what share of its sample “usually” drinks Corona and whether that subgroup is large enough to examine on its own.            

There is some additional data on Corona beer beyond the 5WPR release. The polling firm YouGov, which tracks consumer sentiment on a variety of brands, shows Corona experiencing a pretty clear uptick in negative “buzz,” meaning that people who’ve heard of the brand are more likely to say they’ve heard something bad about it recently. That’s not surprising, especially considering a previous (and similarly overhyped) wave of stories about a small uptick in the number of people searching for the term “corona beer virus” on Google. Stories based on the latest survey are likely to lend themselves to another wave of negative buzz. 

YouGov BrandIndex Poll On Corona Beer (Photo: YouGov)

YouGov’s polling also finds that “purchase intent,” which they define as the share of people who say Corona is the brand of beer they’re most likely to buy, has fallen to its lowest point in two years. But, as YouGov notes, Corona’s product “is closely associated with beach holidays [and] does see substantial seasonal fluctuation.” Looking at the chart suggests that the brand’s recent drop on this metric is only slightly more dramatic than the previous ups and downs it’s seen in years past. (A spokesperson for brewer Constellation Brands told CNN that Corona sales “remain very strong.”)

YouGov BrandIndex Poll On Corona Beer (Photo: YouGov)

In interpreting all this data, it’s also worth asking a few more questions about what it would actually mean if someone said they’d stopped drinking Corona because of coronavirus. It might mean that a person mistakenly believes that the beer would made them sick. But it could also encompass other rationales ― for instance, “the name reminds me of something unpleasant I’d rather not think about,” or “ordering one at the bar feels like asking to be the setup for a joke.”

If the 38% statistic doesn’t tell us much about Americans’ reaction to a pandemic, it does present a pretty good case study in the way misinformation can spread. And it offers one easy remedy to combat it: News outlets shouldn’t write about polls unless they know exactly what questions were asked, and readers should treat any stories that don’t provide that information with an appropriate grain of salt.

Love HuffPost? Become a founding member of HuffPost Plus today.

This article originally appeared on HuffPost.

  • Carrie Symonds: Boris Johnson's pregnant fiancee says she's suffered 'coronavirus symptoms'
    The Independent

    Carrie Symonds: Boris Johnson's pregnant fiancee says she's suffered 'coronavirus symptoms'

    Boris Johnson's pregnant fiancee Carrie Symonds has said in a Twitter post that she's been suffering from 'coronavirus symptoms'.Ms Symonds, who has been living separately from the prime minister since his Covid-19 diagnosis, said she had not been tested for the virus.

  • The Chase's Beast stuns host Bradley Walsh as he admits he knows contestant
    Digital Spy

    The Chase's Beast stuns host Bradley Walsh as he admits he knows contestant

    'Ben the Bandit' and Mark Labbett faced off this week.

  • 'Mrs Brown's Boys' star Brendan O'Carroll's sister dies after 'hanging on' for him
    Yahoo Celebrity UK

    'Mrs Brown's Boys' star Brendan O'Carroll's sister dies after 'hanging on' for him

    One of his other sisters and co-star Eilish O'Carroll said he had got their sibling 'laughing and singing' before she sadly passed away.

  • Coronavirus: Man jailed for accusing council worker of bringing COVID-19 into the UK
    Yahoo News UK

    Coronavirus: Man jailed for accusing council worker of bringing COVID-19 into the UK

    Marcus Spiteri told a council worker he mistook to be Chinese to "go home".

  • Marianne Faithfull being treated for coronavirus in hospital
    The Telegraph

    Marianne Faithfull being treated for coronavirus in hospital

    Marianne Faithfull is being treated for coronavirus in hospital. Her agent Francois Ravard said the 73-year-old is in a stable condition and is "responding to treatment". The singer-songwriter, who has contracted pneumonia, is being treated in a London hospital. Mr Ravard said: "She is stable and responding to treatment, we all wish her well and a full and speedy recovery." Faithfull became famous amid the swinging scene of the 1960s. Her hits include As Tears Go By, which was written by Mick Jagger and Keith Richards. In addition to her music career, Faithfull has also acted in films including Girl On A Motorcycle, as well as theatre productions. The singer has had a number of health issues, including hepatitis C and breast cancer. She has also talked about her struggles with drug use and anorexia. A number of other celebrities including Idris Elba and Tom Hanks have revealed they had tested positive for Covid-19.

  • Australia’s coronavirus victims: Covid-19 related deaths across the country
    The Guardian

    Australia’s coronavirus victims: Covid-19 related deaths across the country

    Australia’s coronavirus victims: Covid-19 related deaths across the country. As the number of cases rises, so does the number of those who have died. Here is a state-by-state list of virus-related fatalities

  • Have I already had coronavirus? How would I know and what should I do?
    The Guardian

    Have I already had coronavirus? How would I know and what should I do?

    Have I already had coronavirus? How would I know and what should I do?. Covid-19 symptoms, when they occur, vary widely and undertesting means many people have probably been unwittingly infected

  • India's government discusses end of lockdown as millions struggle to find food

    India's government discusses end of lockdown as millions struggle to find food

    With the death toll from Covid-19 in India climbing steadily to over 2300 cases and at least 56 dead, discussions within the government have begun on a way forward following the end of the 21-day lockdown period, as well as an exit strategy once the pandemic subsides. Taking a cue from Italy where citizens have lit candles to beat the social isolation imposed by the country's coronavirus lockdown, India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi has called on Indian's to do the same for nine minutes on 5 April to mark the fight against the disease.A symbolic gesture to fight the virus“On this Sunday, April 5, we will challenge the darkness of coronavirus together. At 9 pm, turn off all the lights in your houses and light a ‘diya’(lamp), candle, torch or flashlight for 9 minutes at your doors, or balcony," Modi said in a video message this Friday.This is the second collective gesture that Modi has called for.The announcement was met with ridicule and anger on social media as many questioned the utility of this gesture especially when ordinary people continue to have a tough time especially when it was bereft of concrete economic measures.“What we expected was a generous livelihood support package for the poor, including for those categories of poor who were totally ignored,” said former finance minister P Chidambaram.Since the lockdown was imposed on 24 March, millions of Indians, especially migrant workers have been struggling to access food, as jobs have evaporated.In the effort to flatten the pandemic’s spike, the lockdown has left tens of millions of migrant workers unemployed. Many come from rural areas but live most of the year in India's megacities, serving as day laborers, construction workers or domestic workers.“My family has been struggling to get a meal every day. We cannot go back to our villages as there is a curfew. It will be a miracle if we survive this period,” Pratap Kumar, a construction worker told RFI.“If the virus does not kill us, hunger certainly will. What the government has promised us in terms of remuneration has not reached us,” said Sanjay Deep, an agricultural worker.According to the government’s economic survey, internal migrants make up about 20% of the workforce and contribute an estimated 10% of India's economic output.Under pressure from the emergency, the government finally announced a $23 billion welfare scheme for the poor that included doubling the amount of free food rations under an existing national program, $10 to tide over senior citizens, and raising wages by $0.27 per day for those working under the government's rural employment scheme.Ramping up medical infrastructure Questions have also been raised about the preparedness of India’s health system to face the rising number of cases. A shortage of personal protective equipment (PPE) that health care workers need when dealing with something as infectious as the Covid-19, is a major concern.“We need more ventilators, exclusive infection zones, PPEs and more nursing staff if the pandemic surges. The government is helping out but it has to be done on a war footing,” said Pratap Kumar, a leading surgeon in Delhi.Efforts are also being deployed to track down coronavirus clusters across the country. One aims to identify, test and quarantine anyone who attended a gathering of almost 4,000 people belonging to a Muslim missionary group in the capital late last month. States have traced more than 300 positive cases back to the week-long event.With a lockdown in place, IT firms, corporates and white-collar workers are grappling with a new normal - of working from home for a sustained period of time.“We have a robust telecom infrastructure in place to support people in cities and towns working out of homes. The challenges faced due to the virus outbreak are being addressed,” Rajan Mathews, director general of the Cellular Operators Association of India told RFI.Modi’s government is now thinking of ways on how to lift the lockdown and a strategy to move forward. What forms these measures would assume depends on a variety of factors, the key being the nature of the spread of the virus.One opinion currently within the government seems to be that while it may not be possible to reach a zero-new-case situation by 14 April, the best option would be to focus on specific “pockets” to contain the contagion.

  • Coronavirus UK: how many confirmed cases are in your area?
    The Guardian

    Coronavirus UK: how many confirmed cases are in your area?

    Coronavirus UK: how many confirmed cases are in your area?Latest figures from public health authorities on the spread of Covid-19 in the United Kingdom. Find out how many cases have been reported near you * Coronavirus - live news updates * Find all our coronavirus coverage here * How to protect yourself from infection