Coronavirus lockdown could cause more than 70,000 excess deaths in long-term, government warns

  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
·Freelance news writer, Yahoo UK
·2-min read
In this article:
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
NORTHALLERTON, ENGLAND - JULY 30: Prime Minster, Boris Johnson visits The North Yorkshire police and is introduced to recently graduated Police Officers on July 30, 2020 in Northallerton, North Yorkshire, England. (Photo by Charlotte Graham - WPA Pool/Getty)
A government report has warned of long-term excess deaths caused by Boris Johnson's coronavirus lockdown – though it added not going into lockdown could have cost 1.5m lives. (Charlotte Graham via Getty)

The long-term impact of the coronavirus lockdown could cause more than 70,000 excess deaths, a government report has warned.

The document, published on Friday, said, for instance, that a recession caused by the lockdown could ultimately lead to 33,000 excess deaths in the long-term.

Thousands more excess deaths could happen as a result of reduced basic healthcare services during the lockdown, the report added.

However, it also laid out the disastrous consequences of the nation not going into lockdown in March, saying this would have caused up to 1.5m direct COVID-19 deaths. The UK’s death toll as of Friday was 46,511.

On the other hand, the report also warned: “Much of the health impact, particularly in terms of morbidity, will be felt long after the pandemic is assumed to last.”

It presented scenarios including:

  • 10,000 excess deaths “if emergency care in hospitals continues to be low” in the next 12 months. Emergency attendance and admissions have decreased since the start of the pandemic, the report said

  • 16,000 excess deaths of care home residents if the presence of COVID-19 continues. These could occur, for example, due to the pandemic’s continued impact on adult social care provision

  • 12,500 excess deaths in the next five years due to the delay of non-urgent treatments when the NHS was dealing with the outbreak

  • 1,400 excess deaths as a result of primary and community healthcare services stopping during the lockdown. This could have caused missed cancer diagnoses, for example

  • 18,000 excess deaths within the next five years as a result of a lockdown-induced recession

  • 15,000 excess deaths beyond 2025 as a result of a lockdown-induced recession

Of the overall impact of the outbreak, the government warned: “The estimates for the health impacts from a lockdown and lockdown-induced recession are greater in terms of QALYs [quality adjusted life years] than the direct COVID-19 deaths.”

The government’s focus on an economic recovery has underpinned its coronavirus lockdown strategy during the summer.

Even in areas which have seen fresh restrictions imposed after spikes in infections – such as Greater Manchester, Lancashire and west Yorkshire – businesses have been allowed to remain open, with workers able to go to their workplace.

This is demonstrated by the fact people in those areas are banned from visiting a friend or family member’s garden, where the risk of coronavirus transmission is slim, but are still allowed to drink inside a pub, where the risk of the infection spreading is higher.

Coronavirus: what happened today

Click here to sign up to the latest news and information with our daily Catch-up newsletter

Our goal is to create a safe and engaging place for users to connect over interests and passions. In order to improve our community experience, we are temporarily suspending article commenting