Ex-Post Office boss Paula Vennells agreed with PR who advised her to ditch review into 'past cases' to avoid 'front page news'

Sky News
Updated ·4-min read

Ex-Post Office boss Paula Vennells agreed with a PR adviser who called on her in 2013 to drop reviews into "past cases" involving sub-postmasters because it would "fuel" media interest, the Horizon IT inquiry has heard.

The inquiry was shown a July 2013 email exchange with then director of communications Mark Davies about a review into a number of convictions the Post Office had been told about at that point which might be wrongful because of its IT system.

He had told her that looking at "recent" past cases or those "going further back" would be "in media terms... very high profile" and "fuel the story".

"If we say publicly that we'll look at past cases, whether from recent history or going further back, we will open this up very significantly into front page news," he wrote.

He said there was a "real danger in going too far in commitments about past cases".

In her response to Mr Davies' email, Ms Vennells replied: "You are right to call this out. I will take your steer."

In the inquiry, she said she did not remember whether she took Mr Davies' advice, but her comments drew a loud groan from the public gallery, made up of mainly sub-postmasters, prompting an intervention from the chair Sir Wyn Williams.

Ms Vennells did concede that the view of Mr Davies was a "grossly improper perspective".

She also admitted that had the Post Office decided to review all prosecutions of theft and false accounting at that time, it "may well have" avoided a "lost decade" until miscarriages of justice over its flawed accounting system were discovered.

Post Office inquiry: Day 2 of evidence from former CEO - As it happened

The organisation's former chief executive officer was giving evidence to the inquiry for a second day, having apologised repeatedly for her part in the scandal on Wednesday.

The official transcript showed she said the word "sorry" 23 times on her first day of evidence.

On Thursday - a day on which she frequently answered that she couldn't "recall", "remember" or "wasn't involved in" what was put to her - she admitted it was "possibly" her hope that a mediation scheme with sub-postmasters would "minimise compensation".

'Avoid or minimise compensation'

The 65-year-old ordained vicar accepted that an email she sent in August 2013 which said "the hope of mediation was to avoid or minimise compensation" sounded like sub-postmasters would only be welcome on the scheme if they agreed they would get a "pat on the head and a token payment".

She told the inquiry she did not believe the mediation scheme, set up for people who believed they had been wrongly prosecuted by the Post Office, was for paying out "substantial figures".

In an email from August 2013 to Post Office lawyer Susan Crichton, Ms Vennells wrote: "When we discussed this, the hope of mediation was to avoid or minimise compensation."

After a lengthy discussion about the email, counsel to the inquiry Jason Beer KC said: "Why did you write an email that says 'when we discussed this the hope of mediation was to avoid or minimise compensation'?"

Ms Vennells replied: "Because that was what we discussed."

Mr Beer continued: "Right, good - that was easy then, wasn't it?"

The former Post Office boss said: "But not as the purpose of doing it."

Mr Beer then said: "A hope?"

Ms Vennells said: "Possibly, yes."

'You were seeking to manipulate language'

She admitted attempting to "manipulate language" when she sought to make Horizon bugs sound "non-emotive" - admitting she had been "wrong and stupid".

She told Mr Davies in a July 2013 email: "My engineer/computer literate husband sent the following reply to the question: 'What is a non-emotive word for computer bugs, glitches, defects that happen as a matter of course?

"Answer: Exception or anomaly."

Read more:
Key questions ex-Post Office boss must answer
Post Office inquiry latest: Chair forced to intervene as room scoffs at ex-CEO Paula Vennells' remarks over 'grossly improper' email

Mr Davies replied: "I like exception v much."

Under questioning from Mr Beer on why she sought alternative words to 'bug', Ms Vennells replied: "Because, as I've tried to explain, wrongly and stupidly... we were trying to keep the proportionality around two issues that had arisen that were not anything to do with the systemic impact on the system or the Second Sight interim report."

Mr Beer then asked: "You were seeking to manipulate language here, weren't you?"

Ms Vennells said: "Yes, we were seeking to use language that I thought described better the situation and avoided confusion and conflation with something that I viewed as completely separate."

It comes on the day MPs passed amendments made in the House of Lords to the Post Office (Horizon System) Offences Bill, which will quash convictions of those affected by the Post Office Horizon scandal and which now only requires royal assent to become law.

  • Up next
  • Up next
  • Up next
  • Up next

Latest stories

  • 14 Poor Souls Who Were Excited To Start Their New Job, Only To Realize They Needed To Quit Immediately

    "I spent my entire day inside a Starbucks applying for other jobs, went home, and got paid, but I never returned."

  • Aldi risks fines of up to £600m in Australian crackdown on supermarkets

    Aldi faces the threat of fines of up to £600m in Australia as the country’s Left-wing government mounts a clampdown on supermarkets.

  • Ex-Fujitsu engineer admits changing court testimony at request of Post Office

    Gareth Jenkins, co-architect of flawed Horizon IT system, was expert witness in wrongful prosecutions of operators

  • Disney Tried To Get Gina Carano's 'Mandalorian' Lawsuit Quickly Dismissed, But The Judge Said Not So Fast

    Whenever a high-profile (and high dollar value) lawsuit is filed, the first thing the side being sued does is try and get the case dismissed. That’s exactly what Disney did after Gina Carano sued the studio following her firing from "The Mandalorian." Disney hoped to get the lawsuit tossed on a First Amendment basis, but the judge has dismissed that claim, and the suit will move forward, at least for now. Disney argued in front of U.S. District Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett that the studio had the right to sever its relationship with Carano because she did not espouse viewpoints that the company agreed with. According to THR, the judge stated that the First Amendment could not be used as a shield to potentially violate discrimination laws. Carano is arguing that in firing her she was discriminated against and that the studio violated California labor laws in terminating her.

  • Airbus Slashes Its Guidance. What It Means for Boeing, GE.

    The jet manufacturer expects to earn about $5.9 billion in 2024 operating profit. Wall Street was looking for more.

  • Why even ‘woke’ companies are turning their backs on HR ‘snake-oil’ sellers

    Behind office doors, HR departments at some of Britain’s biggest businesses have recently been feeling defensive and on the backfoot.

  • Working-from-home culture is fuelling depression

    Back from holiday to the blue skies of London, I am not surprised at all by how empty the roads and trains feel during rush hour. Who wouldn’t choose to work from a sunny garden over a drab office, after a start to the summer so dreary that this month has been nicknamed Juneuary.

  • A co-founder of the embattled venture capital firm Fearless Fund has stepped down as operating chief

    One of the co-founders of an Atlanta-based venture capital firm that supports women of color has stepped down as chief operating officer as the company battles a lawsuit that has become emblematic of a conservative backlash against corporate diversity programs. Ayana Parsons confirmed in a statement that she has stepped down as general partner and chief operating officer of the Fearless Fund, which she co-founded in 2019 with Arian Simone to address the wide racial disparity in funding for businesses owned by women of color. Parsons said her decision was unrelated to a conservative group's lawsuit targeting a grant program for Black women entrepreneurs run by the Fearless Fund's foundation arm.

  • Prosecutors seek criminal charge for Boeing: sources

    STORY: Boeing may yet face criminal charges. Reuters sources say prosecutors are recommending the move, after finding the plane maker violated a settlement related to two fatal crashes. Boeing had been shielded from criminal charges over the loss of two 737 MAX jets in 2018 and 2019. Under the terms of a deal agreed in 2021, the company avoided prosecution for conspiracy to commit fraud over design flaws with the planes. That was in return for overhauling its compliance procedures and submitting regular reports. It also agreed to pay $2.5 billion to settle an investigation into the crashes. However, the sources say prosecutors have now concluded that Boeing did not honor the terms of the deal. That follows the midair blowout on another MAX jet earlier this year, which revived concerns over the firm’s quality controls. There was no comment on the report from the Justice Department or Boeing, which has previously insisted it met all terms set by the 2021 deal. Appearing before Congress last week, Chief Executive Dave Calhoun insisted the firm was striving to address its problems: "Much has been said about Boeing's culture. We've heard those concerns loud and clear. Our culture is far from perfect, but we are taking action and we are making progress.”Now it’s not clear exactly what charges might be brought, with possible penalties including a big fine. It’s thought the company would be reluctant to negotiate a settlement if it meant pleading guilty, as that could see it hit with extra business restrictions. Relatives of victims in the two fatal crashes have long criticized Boeing’s exemption from prosecution. They protested inside and outside Congress during Calhoun’s appearance, demanding that the company face criminal charges.

  • Post Office scandal: Legal regulator launched over 20 investigations into lawyers and law firms

    The legal regulators have opened more than 20 investigations into law firms and lawyers who were working on behalf of the Post Office

  • Nvidia share price plunge has one major explanation

    Just one week ago, Nvidia became the world's most valuable company.

  • Federal judge rejects $30 billion settlement between Visa, Mastercard and retailers

    A federal judge overseeing a $30 billion preliminary swipe-fees settlement between Mastercard, Visa and retailers formally rejected the deal Tuesday. The ruling likely means the credit card processors will have to make more concessions to resolve their long-standing dispute with merchants.

  • Oracle Warns That a TikTok Ban Would Dent Revenue and Profit

    (Bloomberg) -- Oracle Corp. warned investors that a new law potentially banning TikTok in the US threatens to hurt its financial results.Most Read from BloombergYouTuber Dr Disrespect Was Allegedly Kicked Off Twitch for Messaging MinorNvidia Rout Takes Breather as Traders Scour Charts for SupportTrump Could Actually Lose Florida. Here’s Why.Rivian Gets $5 Billion Lifeline in Joint Venture With VolkswagenJulian Assange Pleads Guilty to US Charges, Ending 14-Year DramaThe law signed by President J

  • How I used AI to ace my job interview with HMRC

    Robyn*, 25, had already been using ChatGPT to assist with day-to-day tasks when she spotted a listing for a role as a counter fraud investigation officer with HMRC amid her job-hunting last summer.

  • How Rolls-Royce became the ‘hottest stock’ in the FTSE 100 – and what could happen next

    Rolls-Royce has been dubbed the "hottest stock" in the FTSE 100 after being transformed from a "burning platform" to being worth £40bn.

  • My partner and I were worried about starting a business together, but it's only made us stronger

    My partner and I started a non-alcoholic drink brand together, and our business made our relationship even stronger. Communication is key.

  • Sainsbury’s manager excluded from International Men’s Day while off sick with anxiety wins tribunal

    A long-serving Sainsbury’s manager who was left out of International Men’s Day while off sick with anxiety has won an employment tribunal.

  • 3 Indian Exchange Stocks Estimated To Be Undervalued By 27.6% To 36.1%

    The Indian market has shown robust performance, climbing 46% over the past year with earnings expected to grow by 16% annually. In such a thriving environment, identifying stocks that appear undervalued could present potential opportunities for investors looking for growth at a reasonable price.

  • Who can countersign a passport application (plus the rules explained)

    Having your passport countersigned is an important step if you are looking to replace one that is damaged or lost

  • EU sues Apple over App Store payment practices

    Apple (AAPL) faces a new legal battle as the European Union accuses the tech giant of violating recently implemented digital competition legislation. The allegations center around Apple's App Store practices, which regulators claim prevent app developers from offering alternative purchasing methods. Yahoo Finance's legal reporter Alexis Keenan breaks down the details of the lawsuit, providing insights into how it could impact Apple's operations moving forward. For more expert insight and the latest market action, click here to watch this full episode of Catalysts. This post was written by Angel Smith