Greater Manchester school leaves pupils 'wholly underprepared for life in modern Britain'

A private girls school where images of people not wearing orthodox Jewish clothing are censored has been criticised for leaving pupils 'wholly underprepared for life in modern Britain'. Ofsted said children at Beis Ruchel Girls School in Salford gain a 'narrow understanding of the world' and were 'prevented from learning important information about how to stay safe in their lives beyond school'.

The education watchdog said the Jewish faith school, which charges £3,380 a year, 'does not actively promote mutual respect and tolerance of those with different faiths and beliefs'. Images of people wearing clothes that do not fit the 'orthodox Jewish principle of modesty' are censored by the school, Ofsted said.

Pupils, the majority of whom are from the ultra-conservative Satmar community, have only a 'cursory understanding of fundamental British values, such as individual liberty' and do not learn about different religions and values or about the 'rich cultural diversity of the city where they live'.

READ MORE: The latest average cost to buy a home in every Greater Manchester postcode area

Inspectors wrote: "Parents and carers choose this school because its ethos adheres firmly to the tenets of the Jewish faith. Pupils' moral and spiritual understanding develops well.

"They are proud of, and knowledgeable about, their religious heritage. However, a lack of opportunity to build their understanding and tolerance of different people and cultures leaves pupils wholly underprepared for life in modern Britain."

Inspectors also said the school, which has 236 pupils aged three to 11, is 'failing to uphold several of its legal duties', including its obligations around relationship education.

Safeguarding arrangements were also described as 'not effective' with the school's 'limited view of potential dangers' putting children 'at risk'. Pupils are not taught about online safety leaving them 'ill-equipped to protect themselves in modern society'.

Ofsted said inspectors were prevented from speaking to children without an adult present and were requested not to ask questions about 'some aspects of personal development'. "As a result, inspectors were not able to establish whether pupils were expressing their views freely," the report states.

But the Higher Broughton school, which was said to be held in 'high regard' by parents, was also praised for its standards of teaching and for the quality of education it provides. Children 'typically achieve well', the report said, while teachers 'present ideas and concepts clearly'.

Behaviour is good with pupils described 'polite and courteous'. Inspectors wrote: "They follow routines well, showing respect for each other and for staff.

"In all year groups, pupils demonstrate resilience and a determination to succeed. Disruptive behaviour is rare. If it should happen, staff deal with it quickly and effectively."

The school was described as good for its quality of education, behaviours and attitudes and early provision, but was given an overall rating of 'inadequate' by Ofsted, following a three day inspection in March.

The school has been contacted for a comment.