Following her and Brooklyn Beckham’s lavish wedding in April, there had been mounting speculation of a rift between the Transformers actress and her mother-in-law.
It was believed that their relationship soured when the Bates Motel star didn’t wear a Victoria Beckham wedding dress during their nuptials, which led to claims of a rift between the newlyweds and the Beckham family.
However, Peltz has shut down rift rumours and revealed that there was a valid reason for her selecting a Valentino couture wedding gown instead.
She told the Sunday Times: “It’s not a feud! I keep seeing everywhere that word, ‘feud, feud, feud!’ I don’t know why they say ‘feud’? I mean, maybe they picked up on something? And now they’re labelling it ‘feud’?
“No family is perfect. No family.”
She added: "I think it all started, and I’ve said this before, because I didn’t end up wearing Victoria’s wedding dress. But the real truth is I really, really wanted to wear it and I thought it was so beautiful that Brooklyn’s mom got to make that for me.
“And I was really excited to wear it. And I didn’t end up wearing it."
Her latest comments come three months after she initially addressed rumours that there was a ‘feud’ with Beckham, 48.
During their conversation with the publication, Beckham maintained that the whole family gets on.
“I was going to and I really wanted to, and then a few months down the line, she realised that her atelier couldn’t do it, so then I had to pick another dress,” Peltz explained, about her choice of wedding dress.
Dismissing claims of a feud, Peltz added: “She didn’t say you can’t wear it; I didn’t say I didn’t want to wear it. That’s where it started.”
Peltz’s husband also chimed in: “I’ve learned they’re always going to try to write stuff like that. They’re always going to try and put people down. But everyone gets along, which is good.”