Raab confirms Magnitsky sanctions will be introduced to tackle dirty money

Sophie Morris and Caitlin Doherty, PA Political Staff
·4-min read

The Government will introduce Magnitsky sanctions to tackle dirty money following the Russia report, Dominic Raab has confirmed.

As ministers were pressed on why half of all the money laundered out of Russia travels through the United Kingdom, Mr Raab announced he will “shortly be introducing an extension to the Magnitsky sanctions” to crack down on the scandal.

The Foreign Secretary’s comments came as MPs raised concerns about rising tensions at Ukraine’s border due to the recent Russian military build-up of forces there.

Speaking during Foreign Office departmental questions in the Commons, Labour former minister Chris Bryant asked why it has taken “so many years” to emerge that two men whose passports match the names of the Russian nationals suspected of the Novichok poisonings in Salisbury are being hunted by police in the Czech Republic.

He said: “Why is it that there has been such a delay in this information coming to the public and what are we going to do to make sure that murderers on Putin’s payroll are not strolling the seats of every capital in Europe?”

Salisbury poisoning suspects Alexander Petrov and Ruslan Boshirov
Salisbury poisoning suspects Alexander Petrov and Ruslan Boshirov are being linked to a 2014 fatal blast in the Czech Republic (Met Police/PA)

Mr Raab replied: “He’ll know that the Czech explosion that led to the attribution was many years ago.”

He added that the UK has the ability to use Magnitsky sanctions as a “means of targeting human rights abuses”, adding: “And to the extent that they also impinge on dirty money […] I’ve already made clear that we will shortly be introducing an extension to the Magnitsky sanctions to cover that.”

The Foreign Secretary also told MPs that the Government has “significant concerns about the recent Russian military build-up of forces on Ukraine’s border” and that the UK is working with its allies “to de-escalate the situation”.

Mr Raab’s comments came as shadow foreign secretary Lisa Nandy demanded the Government provide a date at which point all the Russia report’s recommendations would be implemented in full.

Ms Nandy said it was “pathetic” that Mr Raab is not standing up for British interests on the matter.

She told the Commons: “He has had 18 months from a publication that his own Prime Minister tried to block. We’ve had no action on golden visas, no powers to sanction corrupt officials.

“Up to half of all the money that is laundered out of Russia comes through the United Kingdom and in three years since the Salisbury attacks it is still not illegal to be a foreign agent in this country.

“Meanwhile, we have seen the oligarchs and kleptocrats that have profited from the Putin regime funnelling money to the Conservative party. He shakes his head, £5 million since David Cameron became leader.

“His own minister, the Minister for Asia, has had multiple donations from a former Russian arms dealer who described himself as untouchable because of his links to the Kremlin.”

A Ukrainian soldier on the line of separation from pro-Russian rebels near Luhansk, Ukraine
A Ukrainian soldier on the line of separation from pro-Russian rebels near Luhansk, Ukraine (Efrem Lukatsky/AP)

But Mr Raab said the Government will “continue standing up” for British interests amid the build-up of Russian troops at the Ukraine’s border and accused Ms Nandy of making “political points”.

Meanwhile, Conservative chairman of the Foreign Affairs Select Committee Tom Tugendhat raised concerns that cuts to the country’s Army could undermine the perceived strength of Nato.

Mr Tugendhat told the Commons: “Has (Mr Raab) done an assessment within his own department about the way Russia is reading the troop reductions in the British Army and the withdrawal from Afghanistan – both of which will be seen from Moscow as a sign that perhaps Nato isn’t quite as serious as we’re making out.

“And what is he able to do diplomatically to make sure that while we do still carry a big stick, some of the elements of it seem to be looking a little weaker – and perhaps he can reinforce it by encouraging his partner in Cabinet to put more resources into the Army.”

Mr Raab replied: “I am afraid I think he is wrong. I think it is absolutely vital that as well as increasing the defence and security budget in the ground-breaking way that the Prime Minister and the Defence Secretary have, we make sure it is agile and fit to face the challenges of the future including not just conventional armed forces but cyber and the other hostile state activity.”