'I'm aghast': Anger as government insists shielding not necessary for COVID vulnerable

Andy Wells
·Freelance Writer
·4-min read
Britain's Prime Minister Boris Johnson speaks during a virtual press conference inside 10 Downing Street in central London on October 20, 2020. - British Prime Minister Boris Johnson said on Tuesday he will impose tougher coronavirus restrictions on the English city of Manchester, defying local leaders who oppose the move without greater financial help. Johnson said the city region of around 2.8 million residents would enter the highest risk category this weekend but, for the first time under a new system of localised curbs, would do so without the support its mayor and other leaders. (Photo by Leon Neal / POOL / AFP) (Photo by LEON NEAL/POOL/AFP via Getty Images)
Boris Johnson speaks during a virtual press conference on coronavirus inside 10 Downing Street. (Getty)

Scientists have hit out at the government’s refusal to enforce shielding rules for the most vulnerable as COVID cases continue to rise.

Advice published last week stated that the more than two million people who shielded during the peak of the pandemic do not yet need to shield again – despite what tier their area is in.

But the move triggered a backlash among experts and some charities, which said vulnerable people may feel forced to go to work.

Dr Stephen Griffin, associate professor in the school of medicine, University of Leeds, described recent numbers, which showed the highest daily figure for cases, as a “worrying trend”.

He said: “Critically, I am aghast that shielding remains paused. Whilst it saddens me to see that this is once again our only recourse to protect those most vulnerable to COVID, they must be enabled both socially and financially to protect themselves once more.

Screen grab of Deputy Chief Medical officer Jonathan Van-Tam during a media briefing in Downing Street, London, on coronavirus (COVID-19). (Photo by PA Video/PA Images via Getty Images)
Deputy chief medical officer Jonathan Van-Tam this week expressed concern for the rate of change in infections among the over-60s. (Getty)

“Whatever transpires as a result of policy, it must be accompanied by a return to the commitments made earlier this year. Most importantly, testing must be overhauled.”

His comments come after deputy chief medical officer Jonathan Van-Tam expressed concern for the rate of change in infections among the over-60s across the nation.

He said at a press conference on Tuesday: “I really want to emphasise that it is the over-60s that really worries us most because these are the people who become severely ill with COVID-19, they are more likely to be admitted to hospital, if they are admitted to hospital they stay in hospital for longer and sadly they are more difficult to save.”

Watch: Hundreds of thousands ‘could be told to shield’

Dr Griffin hit out at the government’s testing programme, and said there was “no evidence” that the tier system for local lockdowns worked in bringing down numbers.

Arguing for tougher restrictions, Dr Griffin said: “It is difficult to understand why urgent action is not being taken on a national level, as advised by Sage, independent Sage and many other observers.

“This is a UK wide problem. If we wait for other areas to reach prevalence as we are seeing in the north of England then the situation will be grim indeed.”

He added: “The pain of the previous lockdown has been squandered, the summer has been wasted. The commitment to suppressing cases and organising effective testing was not met.”

Oxford University scientists this week shared a model that identifies the most at-risk people from the disease.

Mark Woolhouse, professor of infectious disease epidemiology at Edinburgh University, said the research showed that shielding just 5% of those people could reduce deaths by as much as 75%.

The government have said that rather than force vulnerable people to stay at home – risking feelings of isolation and fearful of leaving the home at all – they would instead be sent a letter setting out the precautions they should take.

All those who shielded previously are already helped by wider protection measures not previously in place when shielding was originally introduced, such as the rule of six and face coverings, the government said.

LONDON, Oct. 21, 2020 -- People wearing face masks walk at Canning Town tube and DLR station, in London, Britain, on Oct. 21, 2020. Another 26,688 people in Britain have tested positive for COVID-19, the highest daily increase ever since the pandemic began in the country, according to official figures released Wednesday. (Photo by Tim Ireland/Xinhua via Getty) (Xinhua/Han Yan/Tim Ireland via Getty Images)
People wearing face masks walk at Canning Town tube and DLR station in London. (Getty)

Deputy chief medical officer for England Dr Jenny Harries said: “The new system will provide clarity on how best those in this group can keep themselves as safe as possible depending on the rates of transmission in their local area.”

But Dr David Strain, senior clinical lecturer at the University of Exeter, said the suggestion no extra measures are needed “flies in the face of… announcements by both the chief and deputy chief medical officers”.

He added: “The most significant conclusion that can be drawn from the announcement is that there is a reluctance to support the physical and mental health of the clinically vulnerable.”

A woman wearing a face mask or covering due to the COVID-19 pandemic, sits on a bench close to a display showing health advice in the shopping district in central Sheffield, south Yorkshire on October 21, 2020, prior to further lockdown measures as the number of novel coronavirus COVID-19 cases rises. - More than a million people in northern England will be banned from mixing with other households under tougher new coronavirus rules announced by government minister Robert Jenrick on Wednesday.  The county of South Yorkshire, which includes the city of Sheffield, will enter into "very high alert" restrictions from 12.01am on Saturday (2301 Friday GMT). (Photo by Oli SCARFF / AFP) (Photo by OLI SCARFF/AFP via Getty Images)
A woman wearing a face mask sits on a bench close to a display showing health advice in the shopping district in central Sheffield. (Getty)

Shielding, which was paused at the end of July, aimed to protect those at greatest risk of severe illness and death from COVID-19.

Clinically extremely vulnerable people include those who have had an organ transplant, people with cancer who are undergoing active chemotherapy and those with lung cancer undergoing radical radiotherapy.

People with cancers of the blood or bone marrow such as leukaemia, lymphoma or myeloma are also included, as are those with cancer who are having immunotherapy or other targeted treatments.

Other conditions included are severe respiratory illnesses including all cystic fibrosis, severe asthma and severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Watch: Can you catch coronavirus twice?

Coronavirus: what happened today

Click here to sign up to the latest news and information with our daily Catch-up newsletter