Family of James Bulger launch High Court bid to reveal identity of killer Jon Venables

A case is being brought to the High Court challenging the ban on revealing the identity of Jon Venables (Picture: Getty)
A case is being brought to the High Court challenging the ban on revealing the identity of Jon Venables (Picture: Getty)

A legal challenge brought by the father and uncle of James Bulger over the lifelong anonymity granted to killer Jon Venables is set to be heard at the High Court.

Ralph and Jimmy Bulger are challenging a worldwide ban, made in 2001, on revealing the identity of Venables.

He has been living anonymously since his release from a life sentence for the kidnap, torture and murder of two-year-old James in February 1993.

The toddler was killed by Venables and Robert Thompson, both aged 10, after they snatched him from a shopping centre in Bootle, Merseyside.

James Bulger was murdered in 1993 (Picture: PA)
James Bulger was murdered in 1993 (Picture: PA)

They were both later granted lifelong anonymity and, following release, have lived under new identities.

James’s mother, Denise Fergus, is not involved in the proceedings and no challenge is being brought against the anonymity granted to Thompson.

MORE: Cabinet trio warn they will help delay Brexit rather than leave Europe with no deal
MORE: Traveller duo who led 30 caravans on £300,000 brewery wrecking spree are jailed

The court order was amended in relation to Venables after he was convicted of further offences in 2010 and February last year.

Solicitor-advocate Robin Makin, for the Bulgers, has said that the injunction was granted on the basis that Venables was rehabilitated and would not re-offend but he had since been convicted and sent back to jail over indecent images of children.

James Bulger’s uncle, Jimmy, left, and father, Ralph, are taking their case to the High Court (Picture: PA)
James Bulger’s uncle, Jimmy, left, and father, Ralph, are taking their case to the High Court (Picture: PA)

In written submissions previously before the court, Mr Makin said: “The applicants consider that over 17 years on and with serious offending the experiment of ‘anonymising’ Jon Venables has not worked and that there is danger in seeking to continue with such a course.”

The case is being heard in London on Tuesday and Wednesday by the president of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane.

In a ruling on preliminary issues in May last year, then president of the Family Division Sir James Munby said the murder of James Bulger had “shocked and horrified the country”.

Only a handful of lifelong anonymity orders have been made to date, including those granted to Venables and Thompson, as well as child killer Mary Bell.

In 2013, security guard James Baines, from Liverpool, was given a 14-month suspended prison sentence for tweeting images purporting to be of Venables.

Earlier that year, Neil Harkins, of East Yorkshire, and Dean Liddle, from Sunderland, received nine-month suspended prison sentences for being in contempt of court.

They published photos said to be of Venables and Thompson on Twitter and Facebook.

Last month, Shameless and Brookside actress Tina Malone was served a court summons for allegedly sharing an image on Twitter of a person described as Venables.

—Watch the latest videos from Yahoo UK—